Search

Endoaortic balloon occlusion (EABO) and transthoracic cross-clamping have been shown to have comparable safety profiles for aortic occlusion in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS). However, few studies have focused exclusively on the totally endoscopic robotic approach. We sought to compare outcomes for patients undergoing totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery with aortic occlusion via EABO and transthoracic clamping after a period where EABO was unavailable required us to use the transthoracic clamp. Retrospective review identified 113 patients who underwent robotic mitral valve surgery at our facility between 2019 and 2021 with EABO (n = 71) or transthoracic clamping (n = 42). Relevant data were extracted and compared. Preoperative characteristics were similar other than a higher rate of coronary artery disease [EABO: 69.0% (49/71) vs clamp: 45.2% (19/42), p = .02] and chronic lung disease [EABO: 38.0% (27/71) vs clamp: 9.5% (4/42), p < .01] in the EABO group. Median percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass time, operative time, and cross-clamp time were comparable. Similar rates of postoperative bleeding complications were observed, and no aortic complications were observed. One patient in each group underwent conversion to an open approach. 30-day mortality and readmission rates were comparable. EABO and transthoracic clamp were associated with similar bleeding and aortic outcomes, and mortality and readmission rates were comparable at thirty days postoperatively. Our findings support the comparable safety of the two techniques, which is well documented in studies encompassing all MIMVS techniques, within the specific context of the totally endoscopic robotic approach., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: The robotic platform reduces the invasiveness of cardiac surgical procedures, thus facilitating earlier discharge in select patients. We sought to evaluate the characteristics, perioperative management, and early outcomes of patients who underwent postoperative day 1 or 2 (POD1-2) discharge after robotic cardiac surgery at our institution., Methods: Retrospective review of 169 patients who underwent robotic cardiac surgery at our facility between 2019 and 2021 identified 57 patients discharged early on POD1 (n = 19) or POD2 (n = 38) and 112 patients who underwent standard discharge (POD3 or later). Relevant data were extracted and compared., Results: In the early discharge group, median patient age was 62 [IQR: 55, 66] (IQR = interquartile range) years, and 70.2% (40/57) were male. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive risk of mortality score was 0.36 [IQR: 0.25, 0.56] %. The most common procedures performed were mitral valve repair [66.6%, (38/57)], atrial mass resection [10.5% (6/57)], and coronary artery bypass grafting [10.5% (6/57)]. The only significant differences between the POD1 and POD2 groups were shorter operative time, higher rate of in-operating room extubation, and shorter ICU length of stay in the POD1 group. Lower in-hospital morbidity and comparable 30-day mortality and readmission rates were observed between the early and standard discharge groups., Conclusions: POD1-2 discharge after various robotic cardiac operations afforded lower morbidity and similar 30-day readmission and mortality rates compared to discharge on POD3 or later. Our findings support the feasibility of POD1-2 discharge after robotic cardiac surgery for patients with low preoperative risk, an uncomplicated postoperative course, and appropriate postoperative management protocols., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Barbed nonabsorbable sutures have been widely adopted for tissue closure in noncardiac robotic surgery to improve intraoperative efficiency. Here, we examine the profile in robotic mitral valve repair (rMVR), which utilized barbed nonabsorbable sutures. To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe clinical outcomes for rMVR with barbed nonabsorbable sutures., Methods: A retrospective review identified 90 patients who underwent rMVR using barbed nonabsorbable sutures at our center between 2019 and 2021. The primary outcome measure was dehiscence, while other relevant outcomes included 30-day readmission and 30-day mortality., Results: In addition to fixation of the mitral annuloplasty band, barbed nonabsorbable sutures were employed commonly in concomitant pericardiectomy closure (100.0%, 90 of 90), atriotomy closure (100.0%, 90 of 90), and left atrial appendage closure (if eligible; 98.8%, 83 of 84). One patient who underwent mitral valve annuloplasty using only barbed nonabsorbable suture required reoperation for annuloplasty ring dehiscence. Immediate postoperative ring dehiscence was not observed in any patients after the routine reinforcement of barbed nonabsorbable sutures with everting pledgeted polyester sutures, and no additional patients required reoperation for suture-related complications. Clinical signs of dehiscence were not observed after pericardiectomy, atriotomy, or left atrial appendage closure with barbed nonabsorbable sutures. The 30-day readmission rate was 3.3% (3 of 90), and 30-day mortality was 0% (0 of 90)., Conclusions: These data suggest the initial feasibility of barbed nonabsorbable sutures in robotic cardiac surgery, specifically within rMVR. Further research is necessary to explore the long-term safety and efficacy profile of such approach.

A 61-year-old male presented via referral for mitral regurgitation and was deemed an appropriate robotic surgery candidate for complex mitral valve repair with the maze procedure and patent foramen ovale and left atrial appendage closures, using all percutaneous cannulation. We report upon the first case in the literature that describes the use of only 4 robotic ports, with no working port used.

Previous studies have shown that the endoaortic balloon occlusion (EABO) can provide satisfactory aortic cross-clamping with comparable surgical outcomes to thoracic aortic clamping in the setting of minimally invasive and robotic cardiac surgery. We described our approach to EABO use in totally endoscopic and percutaneous robotic mitral valve surgery. Preoperative computed tomography angiography is required to evaluate the quality and size of the ascending aorta, identify access sites for peripheral cannulation and endoaortic balloon insertion, and screen for other vascular anomalies. Continuous bilateral upper extremity arterial pressure and cranial near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring are essential to detect obstruction of the innominate artery due to distal balloon migration. Transesophageal echocardiography is needed for continuous monitoring of balloon positioning and antegrade cardioplegia delivery. Direct fluorescent visualization of the endoaortic balloon on the robotic camera allows for verification of balloon and efficient repositioning if needed. The surgeon should assess hemodynamic and imaging information simultaneously during the balloon inflation and delivery of antegrade cardioplegia. Aortic root pressure, systemic blood pressure, and balloon catheter tension affect the position of the inflated endoaortic balloon in the ascending aorta. The surgeon should eliminate all slack in the balloon catheter and lock it into position to prevent proximal balloon migration after the completion of antegrade cardioplegia. Using scrupulous preoperative imaging assessment and continuous intraoperative monitoring, the EABO can achieve adequate cardiac arrest in totally endoscopic robotic cardiac surgery, even in patients with previous sternotomy without compromise of surgical outcomes.

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has evolved in its practice over the past several years. Percutaneous cannulation is a technique that can be used during MICS to facilitate cardiopulmonary bypass. This manuscript describes the stepwise approach to percutaneous cannulation and decannulation in robotic mitral valve surgery.