Search

Among the causes of in-hospital acute renal failure, contrast-induced nephropathy ranks third in prevalence. Although it represents a condition of renal impairment with spontaneous recovery, contrast nephropathy should always be considered, because it prolongs hospitalization and it may become a severe complication requiring dialysis. The purposes of this study are: (i) to determine if the application of the most effective contrast-induced nephropathy prevention strategies in the Cardiology Intensive Care Unit can prove to be successful in reducing nephropathy risk; and (ii) to identify which of the involved risk factors persist after the preventive treatment. We examined the patients who had a coronarography at the Bentivoglio hospital from April 2007 to April 2008 who required at least 3 days of permanence in hospital due to the presence of potential risk factors; 136 out of 784 patients were included. Among the selected patients, 21 (15.44%) developed a renal impairment compatible with contrast-induced nephropathy. The risk factors that seemed to display the best correlation with risk of contrast nephropathy were advanced age and an ventricular failure (ejection fraction <40%); however, the critical condition did not appear to be due to a single risk factor, but it resulted from the association of more contextual risk factors. Particularly, the concomitant presence of ventricular failure, anemia, diabetes, previous myocardial infarction and advanced age (>70 years) determined a threefold increased risk of contrast nephropathy. Our data suggest that the development of contrast nephropathy following coronarography is associated with worse renal function during hospitalization and at discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony assessed by ultrasound is emerging as superior to QRS duration in predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the role of conventional echocardiographic parameters of dyssynchrony is still debated. Forty-eight patients with heart failure in New York Heart Association classes III to IV, LV ejection fraction ≤35%, and QRS duration ≥120 ms were studied. LV dyssynchrony was evaluated by M-mode as septal-to-posterior wall motion delay and left lateral wall postsystolic displacement (LWPSD). Interventricular dyssynchrony was defined as the difference between the LV and right ventricular preejection periods measured by standard Doppler. Reverse remodeling was defined as an LV end-systolic volume decrease ≥15% after 6 months of CRT. Thirty-one patients (65%) were considered responders to CRT. At baseline responders differed from nonresponders by having less severe New York Heart Association class (p = 0.006), lower percentage of ischemic cause (p = 0.006), longer PR interval (p = 0.013), shorter LV diastolic filling time corrected for heart rate (p = 0.005), and presence of LWPSD (p = 0.003). At multivariate analysis, predictors of CRT response were LWPSD (odds ratio [OR] 1.045, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001 to 1.091; p = 0.043), LV diastolic filling time corrected for heart rate (OR 0.855, 95% CI 0.744 to 0.981, p = 0.026), and nonischemic cause (OR 0.109, 95% CI 0.018 to 0.657, p = 0.016). In conclusion, preimplantation assessment of cardiac dyssynchrony based on M-mode LWPSD may predict LV reverse remodeling after CRT, especially in patients with nonischemic cause and shorter diastolic filling time. This suggests the potential role of baseline postsystolic mechanical phenomena in determining response to CRT independently of QRS duration. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]