Search

INAMA, G., et al.: Far-Field R Wave Oversensing in Dual Chamber Pacemakers Designed for Atrial Arrhythmia Management: Effect of Pacing Site and Lead Tip to Ring Distance. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence and practical implications of far-field R wave oversensing (FFRWO) and its association with pacing site and lead tip to ring spacing (TTRS) in implantable devices designed to diagnose and treat atrial tachyarrhythmias and programmed with a fixed and short postventricular blanking period. The study included 395 patients who were implanted with a DDDRP pacemaker and prospectively followed. At implant and follow-up visits FFRWO was assessed by analyzing lead electrical measures and atrial tachyarrhythmic episodes collected in the device diagnostics. During a median follow-up of 12 months 11 (2.8%) of 395 patients showed a clinically significant FFRWO that induced inappropriate detection or pacemaker malfunctioning. The atrial pacing site of these 11 patients was right atrium appendage (RAA) for 3 patients, representing 1.1% of 254 RAA patients, coronary sinus ostium (CSO) for 7 patients, representing 7.4% of 94 CSO patients (P0.005 vs RAA), and lateral wall (LW) for 1 (2.9%) of 34 LW patients. The minimal value of the FFRWO to P wave ratio, measured at implant, associated with a clinically significant FFRWO was 0.6; therefore, a value of 0.5 was used as a cutoff to identify patients at risk of undesirable device behavior induced by FFRWO: there were 11 (9.6%) of 114 of RAA patients with short (or = 10 mm) TTRS, 22 (18.8%) of 117 of RAA patients with long (or = 17 mm) TTRS (P0.05 vs short TTRS), 21 (30.6%) of 64 of CSO patients short TTRS (P0.001 vs RAA patients with short TTRS) and 3 (30%) of 10 of CSO patients with long TTRS. The analysis showed that, despite the short postventricular blanking time, FFRWO inducing undesired functioning in AT500 pacemakers is infrequent (2.8% of patients). Compared to RAA, the CSO lead position was more frequently associated with FFRWO.TTRS10 mm was associated with lower risk of clinically significant FFRWO in RAA. (PACE 2004; 27:1221-1230).

New-generation pacemakers allow continuous atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) monitoring that provides accurate information about AT type, frequency, burden, and temporary evolution.We performed a prospective multicenter study to describe AT temporal patterns in patients with sinus bradycardia and AT. Two hundred forty patients (123 men; age 71 +/- 8 years) were implanted with a DDDRP pacemaker (model AT500, Medtronic Inc.). All patients were followed for 13 months. The first-month stabilization period of all patients was discarded from analysis. Seventy percent of patients had AT recurrences. Mean time to first AT recurrence (48.2 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 37.0-59.5 days) was significantly longer than the time between first and second AT episode (10.3 days, 95% CI 6.7-13.9 days, P0.01). A minority of patients had a uniform time distribution of AT recurrences:25% of patients had AT episodes in more than 6 of the 12 months considered in the study. The probability density function of consecutive sinus rhythm days between AT episodes was calculated for each of 40 patients who experienced25 AT episodes and fitted by power law and exponential functions. The best fit was obtained by power law function in 60% of patients, by exponential function in 10%, and the two models gave comparable results in 30% of patients.In our population of patients with a history of sinus bradycardia and AT who were implanted with a new device equipped with atrial pacing therapies, 30% did not experience AT recurrences in the 12-month study period. Analysis of interevent time showed that in 60% of patients AT recurrences do not follow a uniform or random distribution. These findings bring into question the use of cross-over design and time to first AT recurrence as a clinical outcome in trials for AT therapy in this patient population.