Search

There is a paucity of data on the burden of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the United States as well as on its presentation and appropriate treatment strategies.This study aims to provide an analysis of the temporal trends, clinical presentation, treatment strategies, and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ISR in the United States.This study is a retrospective analysis of data collected in the Diagnostic Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CathPCI) registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) between 2009 and 2017. Of the total patients undergoing PCI, we identified those undergoing PCI for ISR lesions. For comparison of in-hospital outcomes, propensity-score matching was employed.Among the 5,100,394 patients undergoing PCI, 10.6% of patients underwent PCI for ISR lesions. Patients with bare-metal stent ISR declined from 2.6% in 2009 Q3 to 0.9% in 2017 Q2 (p 0.001), and drug-eluting stent ISR rose from 5.4% in 2009 Q3 to 6.3% in 2017 Q2 (p 0.001). Patients with ISR PCI were less likely to present with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) (18.7% vs. 22.5%; p 0.001) or ST-segment elevation MI (8.5% vs. 15.7%; p 0.001). In the propensity-matched population of patients, there were no significant differences between patients with ISR and non-ISR PCI for in-hospital complications and hospital length of stay.ISR represents approximately 10% of all PCI and is treated most commonly with another stent. Approximately 25% of patients present with acute MI. In-hospital outcomes of patients with ISR PCI are comparable with those undergoing non-ISR PCI.

Background: The Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) provides early drug delivery and mechanical support similar to those of metallic drug-eluting stents, followed by complete resorption in ≈3 years with recovery of vascular structure and function. The ABSORB III trial demonstrated noninferior rates of target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year with BVS compared with cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stents. Between 1 and 3 years and cumulative to 3 years, adverse event rates (particularly target vessel myocardial infarction and scaffold thrombosis) were increased after BVS. We sought to assess clinical outcomes after BVS through 5 years, including beyond the 3-year time point of complete scaffold resorption. Methods: Clinical outcomes from ABSORB III were analyzed by randomized device (intention to treat) cumulative to 5 years and between 3 and 5 years. Results: Rates of target lesion failure, target vessel myocardial infarction, and scaffold thrombosis were increased through the 5-year follow-up with BVS compared with everolimus-eluting stents. However, between 3 and 5 years, reductions in the relative hazards of the BVS compared with everolimus-eluting stents were observed, particularly for target lesion failure (hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.55–1.24] versus 1.35 [95% CI, 1.02–1.78]; P int =0.052) and scaffold thrombosis (hazard ratio, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.02–2.87] versus 3.23 [95% CI, 1.25–8.30]; P int =0.056) compared with the 0- to 3-year time period. Conclusions: In the ABSORB III trial, cumulative 5-year adverse event rates were increased after BVS compared with everolimus-eluting stents. However, the period of excess risk for BVS ended at 3 years, coincident with complete scaffold resorption. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01751906.

Objectives The authors sought to evaluate the final 5-year safety and effectiveness of the platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES) in the randomized trial, as well as in 2 single-arm substudies that evaluated PtCr-EES in small vessels (diameter Background In the multicenter, randomized PLATINUM (PLATINUM Clinical Trial to Assess the PROMUS Element Stent System for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions), the PtCr-EES was noninferior to the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) at 1 year in 1,530 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods Patients with 1 or 2 de novo coronary artery lesions (reference vessel diameter 2.50 to 4.25 mm, length ≤24 mm) were randomized 1:1 to PtCr-EES versus CoCr-EES. All patients in the substudies received PtCr-EES. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of target vessel-related cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Results In the randomized trial, the 5-year TLF rate was 9.1% for PtCr-EES and 9.3% for CoCr-EES (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97; p = 0.87). Landmark analysis demonstrated similar TLF rates from discharge to 1 year (HR: 1.12; p = 0.70) and from 1 to 5 years (HR: 0.90; p = 0.63). There were no significant differences in the rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion or vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis. PtCr-EES had 5-year TLF rates of 7.0% in small vessels and 13.6% in long lesions. Conclusions PtCr-EES demonstrated comparable safety and effectiveness to CoCr-EES through 5 years of follow-up, with low rates of stent thrombosis and other adverse events. The 5-year event rates were also acceptable in patients with small vessels and long lesions treated with PtCr-EES. (The PLATINUM Clinical Trial to Assess the PROMUS Element Stent System for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions [PLATINUM]; NCT00823212; The PLATINUM Clinical Trial to Assess the PROMUS Element Stent System for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions in Small Vessels [PLATINUM SV]; NCT01498692; The PLATINUM Clinical Trial to Assess the PROMUS Element Stent System for Treatment of Long De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions [PLATINUM LL]; NCT01500434)

Background The Absorb everolimus-eluting poly-L-lactic acid–based bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) provides early drug delivery and mechanical support functions similar to metallic drug-eluting stents (DES), followed by complete bioresorption in approximately 3 years with recovery of vascular structure and function. The ABSORB III trial demonstrated noninferior rates of target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction [TVMI], or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year in 2,008 patients with coronary artery disease randomized to BVS versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Objectives This study sought to assess clinical outcomes through 3 years following BVS implantation. Methods Clinical outcomes from the ABSORB III trial were analyzed by randomized treatment assignment cumulative through 3 years, and between 1 and 3 years. Results The primary composite endpoint of target lesion failure through 3 years occurred in 13.4% of BVS patients and 10.4% of EES patients (p = 0.06), and between 1 and 3 years in 7.0% versus 6.0% of patients, respectively (p = 0.39). TVMI through 3 years was increased with BVS (8.6% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.03), as was device thrombosis (2.3% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.01). In BVS-assigned patients, treatment of very small vessels (those with quantitatively determined reference vessel diameter Conclusions In the ABSORB III trial, 3-year adverse event rates were higher with BVS than EES, particularly TVMI and device thrombosis. Longer-term clinical follow-up is required to determine whether bioresorption of the polymeric scaffold will influence patient prognosis. (ABSORB III Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB-III]; NCT01751906)

Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an established tool in interventional cardiology for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. Over 3 decades of clinical experience and research, techniques have matured and outcomes have improved. Heterogeneity exists, however, in RA utilization and technique. We assembled a group of experienced RA operators and device experts to summarize and critique key elements of contemporary RA technique, to identify areas of consensus and controversy, and to offer recommendations for optimal performance for the practicing interventional cardiologist. Evolution in RA strategy toward a focus on lesion modification to facilitate balloon angioplasty and stenting has underpinned major advances in procedural safety, including opportunity to use smaller caliber equipment and radial access. Optimal technique and improved safety have permitted exploratory use of RA for different lesion types and reevaluation of procedural requirements, including flush solution composition and transvenous pacing. Preparedness to manage complications remains paramount and recommendations for operators and institutions are outlined.

Objective To examine the influence of smoking on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background Certain studies suggest smokers may have enhanced clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition compared to non-smokers after PCI. Whether this is affected by clopidogrel dose is unknown. Methods In this study, we conducted an analysis of 5,429 patients in the Gauging Responsiveness With A VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial. Platelet reactivity was assessed 12–24 hr after PCI (baseline). Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (OTR) (P2Y12 reaction units [PRU] ≥ 230) were randomized to clopidogrel 75 mg or 150 mg daily. Reactivity was subsequently assessed at 30-days, and 6-months. Patients were stratified by smoking status. Results Smoking was independently associated with lower PRU (P = 0.001), and smokers were less likely to have high OTR (odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.68–0.94; P = 0.006) at baseline. Among patients assigned to clopidogrel 75 mg, smokers had lower PRU and were less likely to still have high OTR at 30-days (P

Background Long-term clinical outcomes after exposure to non-ionic iso-osmolar contrast medium (IOCM) or ionic low-osmolar CM (LOCM) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing coronary angiography are unclear. Methods The ICON trial was a prospective, double-blinded, multicentre study that randomly assigned 146 patients with CKD undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to the non-ionic IOCM Iodixanol or the ionic LOCM Ioxaglate. We report the 1-year clinical outcomes. Results After randomization, baseline and procedural characteristics were well-matched between the two groups. At 1 year, three deaths (4.1%) occurred in the ioxaglate and nine deaths in the iodixanol group (13.6%, P = 0.07). The cardiac death rate at 1 year was 2.7% in the ioxaglate group and 9.1% in the iodixanol group (P = 0.07). There were no significant differences in the rates of myocardial infarction (1.4% vs. 1.5%; P = 1.00) and repeated revascularization (6.8% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.75). Conclusions The use of ionic LOCM ioxaglate was associated with a numerically lower mortality at 1 year as compared to iodixanol in patients who underwent cardiac catheterization. Future studies evaluating long-term safety following exposure to different types of CM are warranted. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Risk assessment models for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients and TAVR versus palliation in inoperable patients are based on surgical data and have limited discrimination and calibration in the setting of TAVR. Several novel risk models specifically designed for TAVR have improved discrimination over existing models but require further validation. Several clinical and echocardiographic variables, such as chronic lung disease, mitral regurgitation, and stroke volume index, influence outcomes. This article reviews current and novel risk models and important predictors of TAVR outcomes and proposes a framework to integrate them into clinical decision-making for patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Objectives This study sought to determine whether outcomes for transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) differ between the randomized controlled trial (RCT) and the subsequent NRCA (Nonrandomized Continued Access) registry of the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves) trial. Background The PARTNER RCT demonstrated that TAVR with the Edwards Sapien valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) is noninferior to surgery in high-risk patients and superior to standard therapy for inoperable patients. Methods The inclusion and exclusion criteria, data collection, monitoring, and core laboratories were the same for the RCT and NRCA registry. Baseline characteristics, procedural results, and 1-year outcomes were compared between patients undergoing TF-TAVR as part of the RCT and as part of the NRCA registry. Results In the RCT, 415 patients underwent TF-TAVR, whereas in the NRCA, 1,023 patients did. At 30 days, death, cardiac death, stroke, and transient ischemic attacks were not different in the NRCA registry than in the RCT. Major vascular complications (8.0% vs. 15.7%, p Conclusions The large NRCA registry demonstrates further improvement in procedural and longer-term outcomes after TF-TAVR when compared with the favorable results from the PARTNER RCT. (THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial; NCT00530894 ).

Background The PLATINUM randomized trial enrolled 1530 patients treated with either the platinum chromium PROMUS Element everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) or the predicate cobalt chromium PROMUS/XIENCE V EES (CoCr-EES; manufactured as XIENCE V by Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA also distributed as PROMUS by Boston Scientific), including 124 patients from Japanese sites. This substudy examines 2-year outcomes in the Japanese and non-Japanese cohorts. Methods Patients with 1 or 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions (baseline vessel diameter ≥2.50 mm to ≤4.25 mm and length ≤24 mm) were randomized 1:1 to PtCr-EES ( N = 63 patients in Japan) versus CoCr-EES ( N = 61 patients in Japan). Results Several significant differences were noted in baseline demographics, lesion characteristics, and procedural technique between Japanese and non-Japanese patients, including longer fluoroscopy time, less use of contrast, and greater post-dilatation usage and maximum pressure in Japan. Dual antiplatelet usage at 2 years was also higher in Japan. Despite these differences, the 2-year rates of target lesion failure were comparable in patients treated with PtCr-EES and CoCr-EES both in Japan (3.2% vs 5.0% respectively, p = 0.68) and outside Japan (4.7% vs 5.9% respectively, p = 0.33; p for interaction = 0.82). Conclusions This PLATINUM study subanalysis suggests that the PtCr-EES and CoCr-EES provide comparable safety and efficacy in both Japanese and non-Japanese patients.

Objectives To report 1- and 2-year clinical outcomes of patients receiving platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stents (PtCr-EES) in the prospective, single-arm PLATINUM small vessel (SV) and long lesion (LL) studies. Background Small vessel diameter and long lesion length are independently associated with increased risk of adverse cardiac events after drug-eluting stent implantation. Methods The PLATINUM SV study enrolled 94 patients with coronary artery lesions in vessels ≥2.25 mm to 24 to ≤34 mm long in vessels ≥2.50 to ≤4.25 mm in diameter. The primary endpoint for both studies was target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year compared to a prespecified performance goal based on outcomes with the TAXUS Express paclitaxel-eluting stent in small vessels and long lesions. Results One-year TLF rates with the PtCr-EES were significantly (P

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have substantially reduced in-stent restenosis (ISR) compared to bare metal stents (BMS). However, limited data are available with regard to the burden of ISR in the United States, as well as its clinical presentation and treatment strategies. Using the CathPCI National

REPRISE III is the first large randomized comparison of 2 TAVR platforms: the mechanically-expanded Lotus valve (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) and self-expanding CoreValve (CV) (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland). In aortic stenosis patients with high/extreme surgical risk, Lotus was

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients at low surgical risk has been shown to be superior compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with regard to a composite of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year and noninferior with regard to a composite of death or

Background Transapical (TA) aortic valve replacement was an integral part of the Placement of Transcatheter Aortic Valves (PARTNER) trial. Enrollment during the randomized trial included 104 transapical (premarket approval TA [PMA-TA]) and 92 surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVR) within the TA cohort. On completion of the trial, enrollment continued in a nonrandomized continued access (NRCA) program. We compared the outcomes of NRCA-TA procedures with those of PMA-TA and SAVR. Methods In 22 centers, 975 patients underwent TA aortic valve replacement as part of the NRCA registry. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were unchanged from the previously reported PARTNER trial. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Results Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality was 8.8% for the NRCA-TA cohort, compared with 10.6% and 12.0% for the PMA-TA and SAVR patients, respectively ( p = 0.54). One-year mortality in the NRCA-TA cohort was 22.1%, not significantly lower than the mortality in PMA-TA and SAVR patients at 29.0% and 25.3%, respectively ( p = 0.27). Thirty-day or in-hospital stroke was 2.2% among NRCA-TA patients in contrast to the 6.7% stroke rate observed in the PMA-TA group and 5.4% in SAVR patients ( p = 0.008). Lower rates of neurologic adverse events in the NRCA-TA group persisted at 1 year compared with the PMA-TA and SAVR patients. Conclusions Among the 975 patients in the NRCA-TA cohort, rates of major outcomes including death and stroke compared favorably with outcomes of PMA-TA and SAVR patients enrolled in the PARTNER trial. This trend toward improved outcomes may be attributed to improved patient selection, individual centers surmounting the procedural learning curve, and refinements in surgical technique.

Objectives This study investigated the determinants and outcomes of acute insertion of a second transcatheter prosthetic valve (TV) within the first (TV-in-TV) or transcatheter valve embolization (TVE) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background TAVR failure can occur with both TV-in-TV and TVE as a consequence of TAVR malpositioning. Only case reports and limited series pertaining to these complications have been reported to date. Methods Patients undergoing TAVR in the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve) randomized trial (cohorts A and B) and accompanying registries were studied. Data were dichotomized for those with and without TV-in-TV or TVE, respectively. Results From a total of 2,554 consecutive patients, 63 (2.47%) underwent TV-in-TV and 26 (1.01%) TVE. The indication for TV-in-TV was significant aortic regurgitation in most patients, often due not only to malpositioning but also to leaflet dysfunction. Despite similar aortic valve function on follow-up echoes, TV-in-TV was an independent predictor of 1-year cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 3.38, p = 0.041), with a nonsignificant trend toward greater all-cause mortality (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.88 to 2.33, p = 0.15). Technical and anatomical reasons accounted for most cases of TVE. A multivariable analysis found TVE to be an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.34 to 5.36, p = 0.0055) but not cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.48 to 3.52, p = 0.60). Conclusions Acute TV-in-TV and TVE are serious sequelae of TAVR, often resulting in multiple valve implants. They carry an excess of mortality and are caused by anatomic and technical factors, which may be avoidable with judicious procedural planning. (THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial; NCT00530894 )

Objectives This study sought to evaluate the influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the pharmacodynamic effect of high- or standard-dose clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background There is a lack of prospective, multicenter data regarding the effect of different genetic variants on clopidogrel pharmacodynamics over time in patients undergoing PCI. Methods The GRAVITAS (Gauging Responsiveness with A VerifyNow assay–Impact on Thrombosis And Safety) trial screened patients with platelet function testing after PCI and randomly assigned those with high on-treatment reactivity (OTR) to either high- or standard-dose clopidogrel; a cohort of patients without high OTR were also followed. DNA samples obtained from 1,028 patients were genotyped for 41 SNPs in 17 genes related to platelet reactivity. After adjusting for clinical characteristics, the associations between the SNPs and OTR using linear regression were evaluated. Results CYP2C19*2 was significantly associated with OTR at 12 to 24 h (R2 = 0.07, p = 2.2 × 10−15), 30 days (R2 = 0.10, p = 1.3 × 10−7), and 6 months after PCI (R2 = 0.07, p = 1.9 × 10−11), whereas PON1, ABCB1 3435 C→T, and other candidate SNPs were not. Carriers of 1 and 2 reduced-function CYP2C19 alleles were significantly more likely to display persistently high OTR at 30 days and 6 months, irrespective of treatment assignment. The portion of the risk of persistently high OTR at 30 days attributable to reduced-function CYP2C19 allele carriage was 5.2% in the patients randomly assigned to high-dose clopidogrel. Conclusions CYP2C19, but not PON1 or ABCB1, is a significant determinant of the pharmacodynamic effects of clopidogrel, both early and late after PCI. In patients with high OTR identified by platelet function testing, the CYP2C19 genotype provides limited incremental information regarding the risk of persistently high reactivity with clopidogrel 150-mg maintenance dosing. (Genotype Information and Functional Testing Study [GIFT]; NCT00992420)

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical safety and efficacy outcomes of patients treated for in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents (BMSs). Background The SISR trial is a prospective, randomized trial that compared the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) vs vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for the treatment of BMS in-stent restenosis. Methods A total of 384 patients with BMS in-stent restenosis were randomized to treatment with SES (n = 259) or VBT (n = 125) and were followed for 5 years. Results At 5 years, the rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) had narrowed and were nonsignificant between the SES and VBT groups, with TLR rates of 24.7% and 31.2% (95% CI −16.3% to 2.8%, P = .179) respectively. Target vessel failure was 33.6% vs 36.8% (95% CI −13.5% to 6.7% P = .568) for SES compared with VBT. The rate of major adverse cardiac event at 5 years was 34.0% vs 36.8% (95% CI −13.1% to7.1%, P = .648) for the SES compared with VBT. There were no differences between SES and VBT in terms of survival free from TLR (72.9% vs 66.4%, log-rank P = .08) or from target vessel failure (64.4% vs 61.3%, log-rank P = .349). There were no significant differences in the rates of definite/probable stent thrombosis (5.9% vs 2.5%, 95% CI −7.9% to 1.3%, P = .182) between the 2 groups. Conclusions At a 5-year follow-up, no differences in safety or efficacy outcomes were observed for treatment of BMS restenosis with SES vs VBT. There were no significant differences in survival free from TLR, target vessel revascularization, or major adverse cardiac events between the 2 groups at 5 years. Sirolimus-eluting stent is a viable treatment option compared with VBT for BMS restenosis.

Appropriate utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy is deservedly a national healthcare policy priority for the United States. Because PCI is both common and costly, appraisal of appropriateness is warranted. The initial appropriate use criteria (AUC) have been developed for coronary revascularization procedures and investigators recently reported the appropriateness for the approximately 500,000 PCI procedures performed at centers participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. The AUC have broad implications for both healthcare providers and our patients and will be used as the basis for indications, referral patterns, treatment options, physician education, shared decision-making, and reimbursement for years to come. While we acknowledge the importance of thoughtfully assessing appropriateness for all medical procedures including PCI, there are a number of concerns with the current AUC and methods used to report appropriateness that warrant expanded commentary.

Data have emerged demonstrating the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main (ULM) artery. The 2009 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions focused guidelines for PCI no longer state that ULM PCI is contraindicated in patients with anatomic conditions that are associated with a low risk of procedural complications and clinical conditions that predict an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes. ULM PCI should be performed by operators with experience in the management of the anatomic complexities of left main and multivessel disease, specifically in issues relating to bifurcation disease, calcification, and hemodynamic support. Patients with ostial or shaft disease have lower risk of restenosis compared with distal bifurcation disease. Drug-eluting stents (DES) should be used whenever possible as they reduce clinical restenosis. Intravascular ultrasound is an integral component of the procedure as it provides accurate assessment of lesion severity and can confirm optimal stent expansion and apposition. Compliance with dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 12 months is essential if DES are used. A collaborative, multidisciplinary approach with a "Heart Team" represented by a cardiac surgeon, interventional cardiologist, and non-invasive cardiologist may optimize patient education and objective decision making when obtaining informed consent. Application of clinical and angiographic variables into risk models facilitates appropriate patient selection. Randomized clinical trials will address unanswered issues and help build consensus between cardiology and surgical societies to inform clinical decision making and optimize the outcomes for patients with ULM coronary artery disease.

AIMS: Assess clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound results in lesions treated with the PROMUS Element platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stent (EES). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (N=100) with one de novo target lesion ≤ 34 mm long and reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 2.25-≤ 4.25 mm were enrolled at 14 sites. The primary endpoint was the 30-day composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularisation (TLR), or definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). The efficacy endpoint of 9 month in-stent late loss in workhorse lesions (defined as RVD ≥ 2.5-≤ 4.25 mm, lesion ≤ 24 mm) was compared to a performance goal based on historical results with TAXUS Express paclitaxel-eluting stents. Post-procedure incomplete stent apposition (ISA) was compared to a performance goal based on results with the PROMUS/XIENCE V EES in SPIRIT III. Mean age was 61.8 ± 9.9 years; 77.0% were male; 19% had medically treated diabetes. Baseline RVD was 2.72 ± 0.53 mm; lesion length was 15.4 ± 7.0 mm. The primary endpoint occurred in one patient (periprocedural ST with TLR) with no additional major clinical events through one year. Nine-month in-stent late loss in workhorse lesions (0.17 ± 0.25 mm, N=73) and post-procedure ISA (5.7%, 5/88) were below performance goals (p

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes with a novel platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES) compared with a predicate cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-E...

ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel 150 mg/day in patients with high on-treatment reactivity (OTR) and to further assess this effect according to CYP2C19 genotype.BackgroundHigh OTR is associated with ischemic events in clopidogrel-treated patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Alternative dosing regimens might enhance platelet inhibition.MethodsPatients with high OTR receiving a standard clopidogrel regimen were identified with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and administered clopidogrel 150 mg daily for 7 days, after which OTR was reassessed. Comprehensive CYP2C19 genotyping was performed with the BeadXpress platform (Illumina, San Diego, California) for the *2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8, and *17 variants.ResultsA total of 41 subjects were enrolled, 20 of whom were carriers of a CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) allele. High-dose clopidogrel significantly reduced OTR from 285 ± 47 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) to 220 ± 91 PRU (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in antiplatelet effect according to CYP2C19 status, although the reduction in reactivity was minimal in the small number of patients homozygous for LoF alleles (n = 3, 28 ± 31 PRU, p = NS). Increasing body mass index was independently and negatively associated with the reduction in OTR (p = 0.009).ConclusionsIn patients with high OTR, clopidogrel 150 mg/day results in a significant reduction in platelet reactivity. Carriage of an LoF CYP2C19 polymorphism does not seem to have a major influence on dose effect. The observed lack of effect in patients with 2 copies of a CYP2C19 LoF allele must be confirmed by larger studies.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES) may achieve midterm outcomes comparable to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left main coronary artery disease, but few real-world, long-term studies have been reported. In this study, 376 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease who underwent DES implantation (n = 131) or CABG (n = 245) were evaluated, and outcomes were compared using propensity analyses to adjust for baseline differences. Overall, 367 patients (98%) had complete clinical follow-up for a median of 4.0 years (interquartile range 3.2 to 4.7). Although the overall sample size was limited, there was a trend toward lower mortality with DES versus CABG in unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20 to 1.22, p = 0.13), multivariate-adjusted (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.09, p = 0.07), and propensity score-adjusted (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.03, p = 0.06) analyses. Treatment with DES was associated with a higher rate of target-vessel revascularization (TVR; 18% vs 9%, p = 0.02). However, ischemic TVR was not significantly different between the 2 groups (25% vs 39%, p = 0.15) in patients who received angiographic follow-up. No differences were detected in the occurrence of composite major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between DES and CABG (27% vs 22%, p = 0.42). In conclusion, during 4-year follow-up, overall composite major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were similar after DES and CABG treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease, with a trend toward lower mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention with DES. DES were associated with a higher rate of TVR compared to CABG, but ischemic TVR was not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Hafiz and Poulin [(1)][1] provide a thoughtful description of the hybrid, attending-fellow-in-training model for combined percutaneous coronary intervention and structural training. At Scripps Clinic, this 2-year, hybrid model has been in effect since 2000, and more than 50 fellows have completed

Uncertainty regarding the appropriate duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a thienopyridine challenges every clinician involved in the care of patients considered for or treated with drug-eluting stents (DES). Despite guideline recommendations for extended (or =12 months) DAPT following percutaneous coronary revascularization with DES, few data are available to guide clinical decision-making beyond consensus opinion. Yet considering the clinical implications of stent thrombosis (ST) and its unpredictability in late occurring events, comprehensive assessment of the relationship between DAPT duration and ST over the long-term is a focus for DES-related clinical trials and an essential public health measure. Despite the potential for prolonged DAPT to reduce late-term cardiovascular events related to the progression of atherosclerosis, few studies have formally examined the safety and efficacy of extended DAPT and its impact on late ST events. The purpose of this paper is to appraise the existing evidence regarding the relationship between long-term DAPT and late cardiovascular events; address outstanding (and unstudied) dilemmas related to DAPT in DES-treated patients; and propose considerations for both trial design and clinical practice.

Determining the most appropriate revascularization strategy for patients presenting with unprotected left main coronary (UPLM) disease has been a topic of great recent interest. During this current decade, there have been multiple clinical trials and registries addressing this subject. Previously, UPLM disease has almost exclusively resulted in utilizing a surgical revascularization treatment strategy. However, recent improvements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques in parallel with the benefits of drug-eluting stents (DES) to reduce clinical restenosis have enabled further investigation in catheterization-based treatment strategies as possible alternative therapeutic options. These advances as well as an increased understanding of both the procedural and anatomical challenges involved with complex coronary interventions have allowed further advancements in the field. Better adjunctive antithrombotic pharmacological therapy in the PCI setting has favored such progress. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions guidelines do not currently endorse the performance of PCI as an appropriate alternative to surgical revascularization for patients with UPLM disease. This paper is a review of the current evidence on UPLM PCI and proposes future directions in this evolving field.

Objectives The aim of this study was to determine 5-year clinical status for patients treated with percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion with the PLAATO (Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion) system. Background Anticoagulation reduces thromboembolism among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, warfarin is a challenging medication due to risks of inadequate anticoagulation and bleeding. Thus, PLAATO was evaluated as a treatment strategy for nonwarfarin candidate patients with AF at high risk for stroke. Methods Sixty-four patients with permanent or paroxysmal AF participated in this observational, multicenter prospective study. Primary end points were: new major or minor stroke, cardiac or neurological death, myocardial infarction, or requirement for cardiovascular surgery related to the procedure within 1 month of the index procedure. Patients were followed for up to 5 years. Results Thirty-day freedom from major adverse events rate was 98.4% (95% confidence interval: 90.89% to >99.99%). One patient, who did not receive a PLAATO implant, experienced 2 events within 30 days (cardiovascular surgery, death). Treatment success was 100% 1 month after device implantation. At 5-year follow-up, there were 7 deaths, 5 major strokes, 3 minor strokes, 1 cardiac tamponade requiring surgery, 1 probable cerebral hemorrhage/death, and 1 myocardial infarction. Only 1 event (cardiac tamponade) was adjudicated as related to the implant procedure. After up to 5 years of follow-up, the annualized stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) rate was 3.8%. The anticipated stroke/TIA rate (with the CHADS2 scoring method) was 6.6%/year. Conclusions The PLAATO system is safe and effective. At 5-year follow-up the annualized stroke/TIA rate in our patients was 3.8%/year, less than predicted by the CHADS2 scoring system.

Small studies have indicated that drug-drug interactions and such clinical characteristics as diabetes mellitus may increase residual platelet reactivity in patients on clopidogrel therapy. The independent contribution of these variables to high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is not well studied. Residual platelet reactivity was assessed using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics Inc., San Diego, California) in 377 patients with stable coronary artery disease on maintenance clopidogrel therapy. HRPR was defined using a threshold previously shown to predict adverse clinical outcomes. Residual platelet reactivity was significantly higher in women (220 +/- 82 vs 200 +/- 77 P2Y12 reaction units [PRU]; p = 0.041), non-Caucasians (229 +/- 79 vs 202 +/- 78 PRU; p = 0.047), patients with diabetes mellitus (220 +/- 73 vs 196 +/- 80 PRU; p = 0.005), and those treated with nitrates (233 +/- 70 vs 200 +/- 80 PRU; p = 0.018) or proton-pump inhibitors (218 +/- 79 vs 198 +/- 78 PRU; p = 0.02), whereas residual platelet reactivity was significantly lower in active smokers (168 +/- 82 vs 208 +/- 77 PRU; p = 0.006). Independent predictors of HRPR were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 3.19, p = 0.014), non-Caucasian ethnicity (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.49 to 6.28, p = 0.002), use of proton-pump inhibitors (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.59, p = 0.035), and active smoking (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.94, p = 0.037). HRPR was associated with increased 6-month mortality rates (3.0% vs 0%; p = 0.016). In conclusion, our findings support the hypothesis that clopidogrel nonresponsiveness is primarily the result of genetic mechanisms and factors that may influence activity of the cytochrome P-450 system.

Objectives This randomized, prospective, double-blind, multicenter study compared nephrotoxicity of the nonionic iso-osmolar contrast media (CM) iodixanol versus the ionic low-osmolar CM ioxaglate in patients with chronic renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography. Background The properties of iodinated CM might contribute to the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Methods Patients with renal impairment undergoing coronary angiography were randomly assigned to iodixanol (n = 72) or ioxaglate (n = 74). Results Baseline characteristics were well-matched between the 2 groups. The predicted risk score for CIN was similar in the iodixanol and in the ioxaglate groups (11.9 ± 4.1 vs. 11.8 ± 4.1), as was the use of N-acetylcysteine (70% vs. 73%). The primary end point of the study, median peak increase of serum creatinine from day 0 through day 3 after angiography, did not differ between the iodixanol (0.09 mg/dl; interquartile range 0.00 to 0.30 mg/dl) and the ioxaglate (0.15 mg/dl; interquartile range 0.00 to 0.40 mg/dl; p = 0.07) groups. The percentages of patients with a peak increase of serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dl (15.9% in iodixanol vs. 18.2% in ioxaglate), ≥1.0 mg/dl (1.4% vs. 4.5%), and ≥25% or ≥0.5 mg/dl (15.9% vs. 24.2%, respectively) also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Conclusions In high-risk patients undergoing coronary angiographic procedures, use of the nonionic iso-osmolar CM iodixanol does not reduce renal deterioration in patients with renal impairment, compared with the ionic low-osmolar CM ioxaglate. Given that the study was underpowered to compare nephrotoxicity of the 2 groups under the active medical protection of CIN, a larger randomized study is warranted that will enroll patients with higher risks of CIN under a strict control of hydration regimens and adjunctive medications.

Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the 5-year clinical safety and efficacy outcomes in patients enrolled in the SIRIUS (Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in De-Novo Native Coronary Lesions) trial. Background The SIRIUS trial was a double-blinded randomized study that demonstrated that sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) significantly improved angiographic results (at 8 months) and clinical outcomes (at 9 and 12 months) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS). Methods Patients (n = 1,058) with de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomized to either SES (n = 533) or control BMS (n = 525) and were followed for 5 years. Results Between 1 and 5 years, additional clinical events were similarly distributed among the sirolimus and control groups. At 5 years, in sirolimus versus control patients, target lesion revascularization was 9.4% versus 24.2% (p Conclusions In patients with noncomplex coronary artery disease, clinical outcomes 5 years after implantation of SES continue to demonstrate significant reduction in the need for repeat revascularization, with similar safety (death and myocardial infarction) compared with BMS, without evidence for either disproportionate late restenosis or late stent thrombosis.

In the early 1970s, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was found to improve late survival in comparison to medical therapy in patients with significant left main stenosis.1–3 Once CABG became the standard of care for left main disease, a distinction between “protected”—by at least 1 patent bypass graft to the left coronary artery—and “unprotected left main (UPLM)”— no patent bypass graft to the left coronary artery—was made. In the 1980s, early attempts at balloon angioplasty of UPLM stenoses were associated with poor early outcomes because of coronary dissection, abrupt closure, and restenosis. Mortality rates as high as 30% at 1 year were reported.4–6 In the 1990s, bare metal stents were introduced and soon used to treat UPLM disease. Several small registries found a low rate of procedural complications, but repeat revascularization rates of 20% to 30% because of restenosis were considered unacceptable.7–12 Early bare metal stent registries for UPLM also found high mortality rates, particularly in high-risk patients, such as patients with acute coronary syndromes and poor left ventricular function. Importantly, high-risk subgroups often presented with late sudden death after stenting.11,13 In the early 2000s, the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES), with the promise of vastly reduced rates of restenosis,14–17 raised the possibility of improved late outcomes in this challenging patient group. Response by Smith p 1033 Clinical outcomes after treatment of UPLM disease with either the sirolimus-eluting stent or the paclitaxel-eluting stent from >20 small registries have been published. Results reported in these registries vary widely.18–40 As depicted in Table 1, cardiac mortality between 6 and 12 months after the procedure ranges from 0% to 11%. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates range from 2% to 38%. This wide variation in clinical outcome appears largely because of variation …

Objectives We sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the Impella 2.5 system (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts) in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background The Impella 2.5 is a miniaturized percutaneous cardiac assist device, which provides up to 2.5 l/min forward flow from the left ventricle into the systemic circulation. Methods In a prospective, multicenter study, 20 patients underwent high-risk PCI with minimally invasive circulatory support employing the Impella 2.5 system. All patients had poor left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≤35%) and underwent PCI on an unprotected left main coronary artery or last patent coronary conduit. Patients with recent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or cardiogenic shock were excluded. The primary safety end point was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from hemodynamic compromise during PCI (defined as a decrease in mean arterial pressure below 60 mm Hg for >10 min). Results The Impella 2.5 device was implanted successfully in all patients. The mean duration of circulatory support was 1.7 ± 0.6 h (range: 0.4 to 2.5 h). Mean pump flow during PCI was 2.2 ± 0.3 l/min. At 30 days, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 20% (2 patients had a periprocedural myocardial infarction; 2 patients died at days 12 and 14). There was no evidence of aortic valve injury, cardiac perforation, or limb ischemia. Two patients (10%) developed mild, transient hemolysis without clinical sequelae. None of the patients developed hemodynamic compromise during PCI. Conclusions The Impella 2.5 system is safe, easy to implant, and provides excellent hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI. (The PROTECT I Trial; NCT00534859 )

Proteinuria was associated with cardiovascular events and mortality in community-based cohorts. The association of proteinuria with mortality and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was unknown. The association of urinary dipstick proteinuria with mortality and cardiovascular events (composite of death, myocardial infarction, or nonhemorrhagic stroke) in 5,835 subjects of the EXCITE trial was evaluated. Dipstick urinalysis was performed before PCI, and proteinuria was defined as trace or greater. Subjects were followed up for 210 days/7 months after enrollment for the occurrence of events. Multivariate Cox regression analysis evaluated the independent association of proteinuria with each outcome. Mean age was 59 years, 21% were women, 18% had diabetes mellitus, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Proteinuria was present in 750 patients (13%). During follow-up, 22 subjects (2.9%) with proteinuria and 54 subjects (1.1%) without proteinuria died (adjusted hazard ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65 to 4.84, p

The Food and Drug Administration convened a special public meeting of the Circulatory System Devices Advisory Panel in late 2006 in response to data suggesting a small but potentially significant increased risk of stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents (DES). This panel concluded that "off-label" DES use was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with "on-label" use. In this commentary, we will discuss the role of product labeling in clinical decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention, elucidate the issues that may arise from the conflation of the responsibilities of regulatory bodies and physicians, and offer a potential framework for their resolution.

A clopidogrel loading dose before percutaneous coronary intervention may reduce ischemic events but can increase bleeding risk and result in delayed treatment in patients who subsequently require surgical revascularization. The goal of this study was to examine the dynamics of platelet functional recovery after the common clinical scenario of a single 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel. Fourteen volunteers were administered clopidogrel 600 mg. Platelet reactivity was measured before exposure, 4 hours after exposure, and then daily for 8 days using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Percentage inhibition (PI) was calculated as the relative change in P2Y12 reaction units from baseline. One day after clopidogrel, the median PI was 39.9% (range 8.5% to 97.7%). Before day 5, the number of days after exposure was significantly but weakly correlated with PI (Pearson's coefficient = 0.45, R2 = 0.20, p = 0.001), while most of the variance in PI on each day of recovery was explained by the PI that was observed the previous day (Pearson's coefficient = 0.95, R2 = 0.92, p0.001). The decay in PI over time was exponential, with a common ratio of 17% relative reduction per day (95% confidence interval 10% to 23%). Similar findings were observed when the effect of clopidogrel was defined by residual platelet reactivity or by the adenosine diphosphate-prostaglandin E1/iso-thrombin receptor-activating peptide ratio. In conclusion, platelet inhibition on each day after a loading dose varies considerably among subjects. The level of inhibition depends less on the number of days after exposure than on the magnitude of initial inhibition after loading. A strategy of individual platelet function monitoring should be examined in patients requiring cardiac surgery after clopidogrel loading.

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome of patients treated for in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents (BMS). Background Treatment of restenosis of BMS is characterized by high recurrence rates. Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) improved outcome although late catch-up events were documented. Drug-eluting stents tested against VBT in this setting were found superior for at least the first year; superiority at longer follow-up is uncertain. Methods We evaluated 3-year outcome of the multicenter SISR (Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis) trial, which randomized patients with restenosis of BMS to either a sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or VBT. Results Target vessel failure (cardiac death, infarction, or target vessel revascularization [TVR]) at 9 months as previously reported was significantly improved with SES. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3 years documented that survival free from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and TVR continues to be significantly improved with SES: freedom from TLR 81.0% versus 71.6% (log-rank p = 0.018), and TVR 78.2% versus 68.8% (log-rank p = 0.022), SES versus VBT. At 3 years, target vessel failure and major adverse cardiac events (death, infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, or repeat TLR) remained improved with SES, but did not reach statistical significance. There was no statistically significant difference in definite or probable stent thrombosis (3.5% for SES, 2.4% for VBT; p = 0.758). Conclusions At 3 years of follow-up, after treatment of in-stent restenosis of BMS, patients treated with SES have improved survival free of TLR and TVR compared with patients treated with VBT. Stent thrombosis rates are not different between the 2 groups but are higher than reported in trials of treatment of de novo lesions.

Aims The aim of this study was to determine whether platelet reactivity on clopidogrel therapy, as measured by a point-of-care platelet function assay, is associated with thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs). Methods and results Platelet reactivity on clopidogrel (post-treatment reactivity) was measured with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) in 380 patients undergoing PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to derive the optimal cut-off value for post-treatment reactivity in predicting 6 month out-of-hospital cardiovascular (CV) death, non-fatal MI, or stent thrombosis. The mean post-treatment reactivity was 184 ± 85 PRU (P2Y12 reaction units). The optimal cut-off for the combined endpoint was a post-treatment reactivity ≥235 PRU [area under the curve 0.711 (95% confidence interval 0.529–0.893), P = 0.03], which was similar to the threshold of the upper tertile (231 PRU). Patients with post-treatment reactivity greater than the cut-off value had significantly higher rates of CV death (2.8 vs. 0%, P = 0.04), stent thrombosis (4.6 vs. 0%, P = 0.004), and the combined endpoint (6.5 vs. 1.0%, P = 0.008). Conclusion High post-treatment platelet reactivity measured with a point-of-care platelet function assay is associated with post-discharge events after PCI with DES, including stent thrombosis. Investigation of alternative clopidogrel dosing regimens to reduce ischaemic events in high-risk patients identified by this assay is warranted.

Udgivelsesdato: 2008-Feb BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery is the standard treatment for unprotected left main disease (ULM). Drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has been recently reported in patients with ULM but with unclear results. We systematically reviewed outcomes of percutaneous DES implantation in ULM. METHODS: Several databases were searched for clinical studies reporting on > or = 20 patients and > or = 6-month follow-up. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; ie, death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization [TVR]) at the longest follow-up. Incidence and adjusted risk estimates were pooled with generic inverse variance random-effect methods (95% CIs). RESULTS: From 823 initial citations, 16 studies were included (1278 patients, median follow-up 10 months). Eight were uncontrolled registries, 5 nonrandomized comparisons between DES and bare-metal stents and 3 nonrandomized comparisons between DES and CABG, with no properly randomized trial. Meta-analysis for DES-based PCI showed, at the longest follow-up, rates of 16.5% (11.7%-21.3%) MACE, 5.5% (3.4%-7.7%) death, and 6.5% (3.7%-9.2%) TVR. Comparison of DES versus bare-metal stent disclosed adjusted odds ratios for MACE of 0.34 (0.16-0.71), and DES versus CABG showed adjusted odds ratios for MACE plus stroke of 0.46 (0.24-0.90). Meta-regression showed that disease location predicted MACE (P = .001) and TVR (P = .020), whereas high-risk features predicted death (P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical studies report apparently favorable early and midterm results in selected patients with ULM. However, given their limitations in validity and the inherent risk for DES thrombosis, results from randomized trials are still needed to definitely establish the role of DES implantation instead of the reference treatment, surgery.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has played an integral role in the therapeutic management strategies for patients who present with either acute coronary syndromes or stable angina pectoris. The COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial enrolled patients with chronic stable angina and at least 1 significant (or =70%) angiographic coronary stenosis who were randomly assigned to an initial treatment of either PCI in conjunction with optimal medical therapy or optimal medical therapy alone. Although the initial management strategy of PCI did not reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular events, improvement in angina-free status and a reduction in the requirement for subsequent revascularization was observed. An in-depth analysis of the COURAGE trial design and execution is provided.

In the PLATINUM randomized controlled trial, the PROMUS Element Everolimus Eluting Stent (PtCr-EES) was non-inferior to the cobalt chromium PROMUS/XIENCE V EES (CoCr-EES) for the primary endpoint of 12-month target lesion failure (TLF; the composite rate of target vessel-related cardiac death