Search

Introduction: Rapid treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) depends on sufficient staffing which differs between Stroke Centers and Stroke Units in Switzerland. We studied the effect of admission time on performance measures of AIS treatment and related temporal trends over time. Patients and methods: We compared treatment rates, door-to-image-time, door-to-needle-time, and door-to-groin-puncture-time in stroke patients admitted during office hours (Monday–Friday 8:00–17:59) and non-office hours at all certified Stroke Centers and Stroke Units in Switzerland, as well as secular trends thereof between 2014 and 2019, using data from the Swiss Stroke Registry. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale and mortality at 3 months. Results: Data were eligible for analysis in 31,788 (90.2%) of 35,261 patients. Treatment rates for IVT/EVT were higher during non-office hours compared with office hours in Stroke Centers (40.8 vs 36.5%) and Stroke Units (21.8 vs 18.5%). Door-to-image-time and door-to-needle-time increased significantly during non-office hours. Median (IQR) door-to-groin-puncture-time at Stroke Centers was longer during non-office hours compared to office hours (84 (59–116) vs 95 (66–130) minutes). Admission during non-office hours was independently associated with worse functional outcome (1.11 [95%CI: 1.04–1.18]) and increased mortality (1.13 [95%CI: 1.01–1.27]). From 2014 to 2019, median door-to-groin-puncture-time improved and the treatment rate for wake-up strokes increased. Discussion and Conclusion: Despite differences in staffing, patient admission during non-office hours delayed IVT to a similar, modest degree at Stroke Centers and Stroke Units. A larger delay of EVT was observed during non-office hours, but Stroke Centers sped up delivery of EVT over time. Patients admitted during non-office hours had worse functional outcomes, which was not explained by treatment delays.

Background: Ischaemic stroke may occur despite antiplatelet therapy (APT). We aimed to investigate frequency, potential causes and outcomes in patients with ischaemic stroke despite APT. Methods: In this cohort study, we enrolled patients with imaging-confirmed ischaemic stroke from the Swiss Stroke Registry (01/2014-07/2022). We determined the frequency of prior APT, assessed stroke aetiology (modified TOAST classification) and determined the association of prior APT with unfavourable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 3–6) and recurrent ischaemic stroke at 3 months using regression models. Results: Among 53,352 patients, 27,484 (51.5%) had no prior antithrombotic treatment, 17,760 (33.3%) were on APT, 7039 (13.2%) on anticoagulation and 1069 (2.0%) were on APT + anticoagulation. In patients with a history of ischaemic stroke/TIA ( n = 11,948; 22.4%), 2401 (20.1%) had no prior antithrombotic therapy, 6594 (55.2%) were on APT, 2489 (20.8%) on anticoagulation and 464 (3.9%) on APT + anticoagulation. Amongst patients with ischaemic stroke despite APT, aetiology was large artery atherosclerosis in 19.8% ( n = 3416), cardiac embolism in 23.6% ( n = 4059), small vessel disease in 11.7% ( n = 2011), other causes in 7.4% ( n = 1267), more than one cause in 6.3% ( n = 1078) and unknown cause in 31.3% ( n = 5388). Prior APT was not independently associated with unfavourable outcome (aOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.98–1.14; p = 0.135) or death (aOR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.99–1.21; p = 0.059) at 3-months but with increased odds of recurrent stroke (6.0% vs 4.3%; aOR 1.26; 95% CI: 1.11–1.44; p Conclusions: One-third of ischaemic strokes occurred despite APT and 20% of patients with a history of ischaemic stroke had no antithrombotic therapy when having stroke recurrence. Aetiology of breakthrough strokes despite APT is heterogeneous and these patients are at increased risk of recurrent stroke.

Background: We determined the frequency of different etiologies of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and their association with clinical characteristics and outcomes. Methods: We analyzed data from consecutive ICH patients enrolled in the prospective Swiss Stroke Registry (2014-2019). Etiology of ICH was determined according to prespecified, mutually exclusive categories. We assessed prevalence of ICH etiologies, their association with clinical characteristics, functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0-2), mortality, recurrent ICH and ischemic stroke at 3 months. Results: We included 2584 patients (median age 72y, IQR 64-82, 46.6% female, median NIHSS 10; IQR 3-15). 2037 patients (80%) had hypertension and 553 (22.3%) were on anticoagulants. Distribution of etiologies was as follows: Hypertension (n=1216 patients; 47.1% of all / 56.3% of patients with hypertension), unknown etiology (n=542, 21.0%), antithrombotic therapy (n=225, 8.7% of all / 38% of patients on anticoagulants), cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA, n=211, 8.2%), macro-vascular (n=121, 4.7%), other determined etiologies (n=269, 10.4%). Patients with hypertensive ICH had significantly higher NIHSS (median 9; IQR 4-16) and blood pressure levels (median systolic 176; IQR 156-195) on admission. Patients with CAA had significantly lower NIHSS at baseline (median 5; IQR 2-12). Three month follow-up was available for 2109/2584 patients (81.6%). 820 (38.9%) were functionally independent, 658 have died (31.2%). Hypertensive ICH was associated with an increased rate of functional independence (aOR =1.42, 95%CI 1.06-1.90, p=0.02). 5.2% of patients had a cerebrovascular event within 3 months. CAA was associated with a high risk of recurrent ICH (HR 6.95, 95%CI 3.05-15.84, p Conclusions: In Swiss Stroke Units and Centers, one of two patients has ICH from a different cause than hypertension. The rate of functionally independent patients at 3 months seems higher than mortality. Absolute and relative risks of recurrent ICH and ischemic stroke after recent ICH differ among underlying etiologies.