Search

Background: Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). However, results in non-ICM (NICM) patients are not satisfactory, and studies comparing differences between NICM and ICM are limited. We conducted a meta-analysis of procedural characteristics and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation for VA, comparing results between ICM and NICM., Methods: Studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed. Four studies reporting comparison of catheter ablation of VA between ICM and NICM were examined. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to appraise study quality. A random-effects model with inverse variance method was used for comparisons., Results: Epicardial approach was significantly more undertaken for the NICM group than in the ICM group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09-0.18; P < .00001). Mean ablation time (P = .54), fluoroscopy time (P = .55), and procedural time (P = .18) did not differ significantly between the ICM and NICM groups. Procedural failure rates (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24-0.89; P = .02) and VA recurrence rates (risk ratio [RR]: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46-1.01; P = .06) were significantly higher in the NICM group than in the ICM group. However, all-cause mortality (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.75-2.49; P = .31) did not differ significantly between groups., Conclusions: Procedural failure and VA recurrence rates were significantly higher in the NICM group, despite significantly more frequent epicardial access. These highlight the limitations of catheter ablation for VA in NICM, given our current knowledge., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia, or atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia utilizing a slowly conducting posteroseptal accessory pathway, is a rare form of reentrant supraventricular tachycardia in children and adults. The characteristic features of this narrow complex tachycardia are a long RP interval and inverted P waves in the inferior leads. This form of accessory-pathway-mediated tachycardia, which is usually incessant, can lead to a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure if left untreated. Radiofrequency ablation of the accessory pathway in permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia is the definitive treatment in these patients, and in many instances the effects of prolonged tachycardia on ventricular function are reversible after successful ablation. We present an illustrative case.

Background: It is not known whether patients with normal baseline left ventricular (LV) function who develop right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardiomyopathy as a result of dual-chamber pacing can benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We retrospectively assessed the effect of a CRT upgrade on RV pacing-induced cardiomyopathy., Methods and Results: We reviewed the charts of patients who received a CRT device for RV pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. We assessed the effects of CRT on LV function, recovery, and other response parameters. From September 2005 through February 2009, 21 patients (13 men; aged 63 + or - 9 years) underwent a treatment upgrade to a CRT system. Before the dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted, the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was 53 + or - 2.3%. After pacing, the LVEF was 31.2 + or - 3.8%, the LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) was 5.8 + or - 0.5 cm, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were 426 + or - 149 pg/mL. The duration of pacing before documentation of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy was 3.8 + or - 1.5 months. All the patients had been on a stable medical regimen for at least 2 months. After the upgrade to CRT, the follow-up time was 4.9 + or - 0.9 months. Sixteen patients (76%) reported a significant improvement in their symptoms. After the CRT upgrade, the LVEF increased to 37.4 + or - 9.0% (P < 0.01 vs pre-CRT). The LVEDD decreased to 5.0 + or - 1.0 cm (P = 0.03 vs pre-CRT), and BNP levels decreased to 139 + or - 92 pg/mL (P = 0.08 vs pre-CRT)., Conclusion: A CRT upgrade is an effective treatment for RV pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and should be implemented as soon as the diagnosis is established. Unfortunately, about 24% of our patients did not respond to the upgrade.

Introduction: Diffuse transmural fibrosis and scarring limited to the area without atrial dilation or significant structural heart or other systemic disease has not been reported. We present three cases of a syndrome characterized by refractory organized atrial arrhythmias, diffuse atrial scarring with electrical silence, and mechanical paralysis in the absence of atrial dilation or any systemic or neurodegenerative disorders., Methods: Patients referred for electrophysiology study of atrial arrhythmias were included. Electroanatomic mapping with the Carto system (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with scar sequencing were performed., Results: There was no family or personal history of cardiac, muscular, or developmental diseases. All patients had organized atrial arrhythmias. Echocardiograms showed atrial standstill with normal atrial and ventricular dimensions. No other structural abnormalities were noted. Carto mapping revealed severe biatrial diffuse scarring. The left atrial (LA) was less affected than the right atrial (RA). MRI findings confirmed biatrial scarring. During tachycardia, islands of dissociated electrical activity could be seen in the right atria. Entrainment mapping was not performed in the atria as high-output pacing could not capture the atria. Coronary sinus entrainment demonstrated the coronary sinus(CS) not to be critical to the tachycardia. Ablation was targeted toward channels of low voltage but was not successful in any cases. All required atrioventricular (AV) nodal ablation with pacing., Conclusion: An association between biatrial cardiomyopathy and scarring with normal atrial dimensions has been described. Since severe scarring has not been reported with organized arrhythmias this may represent a new syndrome.

The article presents a case study of 93-year-old woman with ischemic cardiomyopathy for analysis of her pacemaker functioning. Topics discussed include assessment of an electrocardiography (ECG) of the patient with examination of her electrocardiograph; observation of atrial tachycardia conditions through ECG with maintenance of pacemaker normal functioning in DDI pacing mode; and determination of postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) by intracardiac electrogram.

Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia, or atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia utilizing a slowly conducting posteroseptal accessory pathway, is a rare form of reentrant supraventricular tachycardia in children and adults. The characteristic features of this narrow complex tachycardia are a long RP interval and inverted P waves in the inferior leads. This form of accessory-pathway-mediated tachycardia, which is usually incessant, can lead to a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure if left untreated. Radiofrequency ablation of the accessory pathway in permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia is the definitive treatment in these patients, and in many instances the effects of prolonged tachycardia on ventricular function are reversible after successful ablation. We present an illustrative case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]