1. Lipoprotein(a) reductions from PCSK9 inhibition and major adverse cardiovascular events: Pooled analysis of alirocumab phase 3 trials.
- Author
-
Ray KK, Vallejo-Vaz AJ, Ginsberg HN, Davidson MH, Louie MJ, Bujas-Bobanovic M, Minini P, Eckel RH, and Cannon CP
- Subjects
- Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Anticholesteremic Agents adverse effects, Biomarkers blood, Cardiovascular Diseases blood, Cardiovascular Diseases enzymology, Cardiovascular Diseases mortality, Cholesterol, LDL blood, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Down-Regulation, Dyslipidemias blood, Dyslipidemias enzymology, Dyslipidemias mortality, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Proprotein Convertase 9 metabolism, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Serine Proteinase Inhibitors adverse effects, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Anticholesteremic Agents therapeutic use, Cardiovascular Diseases prevention & control, Dyslipidemias drug therapy, Lipoprotein(a) blood, PCSK9 Inhibitors, Serine Proteinase Inhibitors therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background and Aims: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are considered a causal factor for cardiovascular disease. In phase 3 ODYSSEY trials, alirocumab reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lp(a), with concomitant reductions in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We assessed whether lower on-study and greater percentage reductions in Lp(a) are associated with a lower risk of MACE., Methods: Post-hoc analysis of data pooled from 10 phase 3 ODYSSEY trials comparing alirocumab with control (placebo or ezetimibe) in patients (n = 4983) with cardiovascular disease and/or risk factors, and hypercholesterolemia despite statin/other lipid-lowering therapies., Results: Median (Q1, Q3) baseline Lp(a) levels were 23.5 (8.0, 67.0) mg/dL. Median Lp(a) changes from baseline with alirocumab were -25.6% vs. -2.5% with placebo (absolute reductions 6.8 vs. 0.5 mg/dL) in placebo-controlled trials, and -21.4% vs. 0.0% with ezetimibe (4.5 vs. 0.0 mg/dL) in ezetimibe-controlled trials. During follow-up (6699 patient-years), 104 patients experienced MACE. A 12% relative risk reduction in MACE per 25% reduction in Lp(a) (p=0.0254) was no longer significant after adjustment for LDL-C changes: hazard ratio per 25% reduction: 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.01; p=0.0780). In subgroup analysis, the association between Lp(a) reduction and MACE remained significant in a fully adjusted model among participants with baseline Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (p-interaction vs. Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL: 0.0549)., Conclusions: In this population, Lp(a) reductions were not significantly associated with MACE independently of LDL-C reductions. Reducing the risk of MACE by targeting Lp(a) may require greater reductions in Lp(a) with more potent therapies and/or higher initial Lp(a) levels., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF