Search

Aims: To assess whether there was any significant difference in the average fractional urinary fluoride excretion (FUFE) values among adults consuming (NaF) fluoridated Ca-free water (reference water), naturally fluoridated hard water and an artificially (H2SiF6) fluoridated soft water., Design: Sixty adult females (N=20 for each treatment) participated in this randomized, double-blind trial. The experimental design of this study provided an indirect estimation of the fluoride absorption in different types of water through the assessment of the fractional urinary fluoride excretion of volunteers., Results: Average daily FUFE values (daily amount of fluoride excreted in urine/daily total fluoride intake) were not significantly different between the three treatments (Kruskal-Wallis; p = 0.62). The average 24-hour FUFE value (n=60) was 0.69; 95% C.I. 0.65-0.73., Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the absorption of fluoride is not affected by water hardness.

Unlabelled: Fluoride in drinking water may be present from natural sources or added as sodium fluoride (NaF), sodium silicofluoride (Na(2)SiF(6)) or fluorosilicic acid (H(2)SiF(6)). Results from an early study with rats suggested that, when ingested as Na(2)SiF(6), the absorption and excretion of fluoride were greater than when ingested as NaF., Objective: The present single-blind, crossover study with 10 adults was done to determine three key pharmacokinetic parameters: the maximum plasma fluoride concentrations (C(max)), the elapsed time to reach the maximum concentrations (T(max)) and the 6-h areas under the time-plasma concentration curves (AUCs) after ingestion of 500 mL of water containing 0.67 or 5.45 mg F/L present naturally or added as NaF or H(2)SiF(6)., Design: Blood was collected prior to and at nine time points during 6h after ingestion of the test solutions. Plasma was analysed by electrode after HMDS-facilitated diffusion and the data were analysed for statistically significant differences using repeated measures ANOVA., Results: The C(max), T(max) and AUC values after ingestion of the solutions containing natural fluoride, NaF or H(2)SiF(6) did not differ significantly at either dose level. Further, the T(max) values associated with the 0.67 and 5.45 mg/L solutions did not differ significantly indicating that the absorption, distribution and elimination rates were not affected by the dose size., Conclusions: Considered together with published reports, the present findings support the conclusion that the major features of fluoride metabolism are not affected differently by the chemical compounds commonly used to fluoridate water nor are they affected by whether the fluoride is present naturally or added artificially.

This study is on fluoride uptake into enamel following fluoride precipitation with calcium hydroxide. Five specimens each from 12 bovine incisors were polished, covered with a salivary pellicle, and distributed into five groups (n=12). A fluoride solution (43,500 ppm F from magnesiumfluorosilicate, copper-(II)-fluorosilicate and sodium-fluoride, pH 2; Tiefenfluorid Touchierlösung, Humanchemie) and Ca(OH)2-solution (Tiefenfluorid Nachtouchierlösung) were applied subsequently in group TN. "Touchierlosung" only was used in group T, sodium-fluoride (43,500 ppm F, pH 2) in group NaF, and aminefluoride (Elmex fluid, 10,000 ppm F, pH 4) in group EF. No fluoride was used in group NK (negative control). Following rinsing and 24 h storage in artificial saliva surface KOH-soluble fluoride content (KOHF), and structurally bound fluoride content (SBF) from three layers (0-33, 33-66 and 66-99 pm) was determined by fluoride electrode procedures. KOHF (median in microg/cm2) of NK was below the lower limit of quantification of the fluoride electrode. The other group values were significantly higher (Mann-Whitney test, p < or = 0.05). TN (1.6), T (1.4) and NaF (1.1) did not differ significantly. EF (0.6) was significantly smaller than TN and T but not smaller than NaF. SBF (0-33, 33-66, 66-99 pm; median in microg/cm3) of TN (445, 341, 275), T (644, 481, 360), NaF (804, 480, 307) and EF (449, 346, 280) did not differ significantly but, with the exception of TN, were significantly higher as compared to NK. A precipitation reaction with Ca(OH)2 following fluoridation did not increase enamel fluoride uptake.

A constant-composition fluoride (F) titration method was used to measure the amount of leachable F deposited on root surfaces in vitro by a 1-min rinse with a 12 mmol/l sodium fluoride (228 micrograms/g F) solution or a two-solution rinse that contained 2 mmol/l sodium fluorosilicate (228 micrograms/g total F ) and 10 mmol/l calcium chloride. The mean +/- standard deviations (n = 3) F uptake from the two rinse treatments were 0.70 +/- 0.24 micrograms/cm2 and 3.25 +/- 0.74 micrograms/cm2, respectively. In a separate experiment, the effects of sodium fluoride and the two-solution rinses on remineralization of root lesions were evaluated in an in vitro pH cycling model. The results showed that the average decrease in mineral loss (delta Z) in the two-solution rinse group (60%) was significantly greater than that obtained in the NaF rinse (41%) or the control (9%) group.