Search

There are many studies supporting the family history in lung cancer. In this study, we observed 1500 with lung cancer cases diagnosed between the years 1995-2000 in our clinic, and investigated family tendency of lung cancer in a control group including partners of 600 patients with family history of cancer. We conducted face-to-face interviews with 100 patients with lung cancer, and with first degree relatives of the other 1400 patients with lung cancer. There were 600 positive family history of cancer. Control populations were matches of the cancer patients with positive family history of cancer. Cases and controls were asked to report on their family history of cancer, as well as smoking status of family members. In conclusion, in 40% of 1500 patients with lung cancer, there was positive family history of lung cancer with regard to malignity. This positive family history of cancer was consisted of 51.8% lung cancer, 35.5% digestive cancer and 12.7% other cancers such as breast, larynx, prostate and bone. In control group, the value of the positive family history of lung cancer with regard to malignity was 5.0% (p0.001). These results support the hypothesis of a genetic susceptibility by showing that the patients with lung cancer have significantly more positive family history of lung cancer and digestive cancer.

This study was designed to evaluate the effects of furniture production, mainly including fir tree (aberia mulleriana), on respiratory health of young workers and to compare the results with those obtained from previous studies. Sixty-four furniture-decoration students (57 males and 7 females) and 62 controls (54 male, 8 female) from different departments in the same school were included into the study. All participants were assessed with a questionnaire (concerning history of occupational exposure, work-related respiratory and other symptoms, smoking history, previous asthma history), full physical examination, spirometric evaluation and chest radiograph. Participants then performed serial monitoring of peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) at work and away from work within a month. Mean age of students was 20.9 +/- 3.7 years, 20.5 +/- 2.6 years in controls. There was no difference between study and control groups with regard to age, gender, smoking status and previous asthma history. Reported cough (23.4 % vs. 8.1 %) and shortness of breath (18.8 % vs. 6.5 %) were significantly higher in furniture-decoration students than in controls (p = 0.016 and p = 0.034, respectively). Furniture-decoration students had higher conjunctivitis (34.4 % vs. 9.7 %, p = 0.001) and rhinitis (34.4 % vs. 19.4 %, p = 0.044) history when compared with controls. Both students and controls were normal in terms of respiratory examination. PEF recordings were performed for approximately one month. Diurnal variability greater than 20 % was seen in 12/64 (18.7 %) of students at work, whereas it was detected in 4/62 (6.4 %) of controls (p = 0.034). When comparing for the presence of diurnal variability greater than 20 % in weekends, no difference was found between groups (p = 0.457). In conclusion, early detection of work-related respiratory changes by serial monitoring of peak expiratory flows should save the workers from hazardous respiratory effects of the furniture production, especially in young population.