Search

Background and Aims: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an emerging technique for the palliation of inoperable malignant biliary strictures (MBSs). We aimed to systemically investigate the long-term outcome of RFA in a large cohort of patients., Methods: We recruited 883 patients with various MBSs who underwent endoscopic interventions at two large-volume centers; 124 patients underwent RFA and stenting, whereas 759 underwent stenting alone. To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM). The main outcome was overall survival (OS)., Results: Following PSM, patients in the RFA group showed significantly longer OS (9.5 months; 95% CI: 7.7-11.3 months) than those in the stenting alone group (6.1 months; 95% CI: 5.6-6.6 months; P < .001). In stratified analyses, the improved OS was only demonstrated in the subgroup of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (11.3 months 95% CI: 10.2-12.4 vs 6.9 months 95% CI: 6.0-7.8; P < .001), but not in the subgroups of gallbladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and other metastatic cancers (all P > .05). The survival benefits were noted only in the patients with non-metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (11.5 vs 7.4 months, P < .001)., Conclusions: The survival benefits of endoscopic RFA appear to be limited to patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma without distant metastasis., (© 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Objectives: Patients with advanced ampullary carcinoma (AC) who are unsuitable for surgery are most likely to have poor outcomes. The role of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in this population has not been fully defined. We aimed to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of RFA in a large cohort of AC patients., Methods: In this retrospective study, data of consecutive patients with pathologically proven AC who underwent successful endobiliary RFA and/or stent placement were collected. All patients did not undergo surgical resection. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included clinical success and adverse events., Results: A total of 85 patients, 50 in the RFA plus stenting group and 35 in the stenting alone group, were identified. The median OS was significantly longer in the RFA group than in the stenting alone group (16.9 vs. 9.8 months, P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox analysis, RFA (hazards ratio 0.408; 95% confidence interval 0.235-0.706; P = 0.001) was the only independent OS predictor. Eight patients with stage II tumors, exclusively from the RFA group, survived for more than 3 years. Clinical success was comparable between the two groups (96% vs. 100%, P = 0.231). Early adverse events between the two groups were similar (10% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.206); however, late biliary/pancreatic stenoses occurred in three RFA patients who were successfully managed with endoscopic interventions., Conclusions: Endoscopic RFA appears to prolong patients' survival with acceptable safety; it may therefore be a feasible treatment option for patients with inoperable ampullary cancers., (© 2021 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background and Aims: We sought to compare the efficacy and safety between endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stent placement alone in patients with unresectable extrahepatic biliary cancer (EBC)., Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or ampullary cancer who were unsuitable for surgery were recruited from 3 tertiary centers. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to RFA plus plastic stent placement (RFA group) or plastic stent placement alone (stent placement alone group) in a 1:1 ratio. Both groups underwent 2 scheduled interventions with an interval of approximately 3 months. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS)., Results: Altogether, 174 participants completed the 2 index endoscopic interventions. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were noted between the 2 groups. The median OS was significantly higher in the RFA group (14.3 vs 9.2 months; hazard ratio, .488; 95% confidence interval, .351-.678; P < .001). A survival benefit was also shown in patients with CCA (13.3 vs 9.2 months; hazard ratio, .546; 95% confidence interval, .386-.771; P < .001). However, no significant between-group differences were found in jaundice control or stent patency duration. The postprocedural Karnofsky performance scores were significantly higher in the RFA group until 9 months (all P < .001). Adverse events were comparable between the 2 groups (27.6% vs 19.5%, P = .211), except for acute cholecystitis, which was more frequently observed in the RFA group (9 vs 0, P = .003)., Conclusions: Compared with stent placement alone, additional RFA may improve OS and quality of life of patients with inoperable primary EBC who do not undergo systemic treatments. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01844245.)., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Endoscopic biliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been increasingly used to treat unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). We aimed to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and its impact on patient's survival., Methods: A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed by extracting the data from the included studies with regard to technical effectiveness, overall survival, adverse events and mortality of endoscopic RFA., Results: A total of nine studies comprising 263 patients with MBO were included in the analysis. There was a significant increase in the diameter of stricture (3.446 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.356-3.536 mm) after the endoscopic biliary RFA. The overall survival time was 9.62 months, with pooled 30-day, 90-day and 2-year mortality rates of 2% (95% CI 0.5-5.9%), 21% (95% CI 5-37%), and 48% (95% CI 37-59%), respectively. The pooled rate of adverse events was 17% (95% CI 10-25%), and most complications were mild and managed conservatively. Severe adverse events occurred in three patients (two deaths due to hemobilia and one with partial liver infarction)., Conclusions: Endoscopic biliary RFA is effective and generally safe in the management of unresectable biliary malignancies, and may improve patients' overall survival. Prospective, randomized controlled studies are required to further support the results., (© 2016 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background and Aim: Endoscopic management of benign biliary stricture (BBS) remains challenging. There is no reported method for the amelioration of biliary fibroplasia endoscopically. We report our initial experience of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the management of BBS., Methods: Nine patients with BBS (postoperation stricture four, liver transplant three, and chronic inflammation two), seven of whom had previously unsuccessful endoscopic or percutaneous interventions, were enrolled. Intraductal bipolar RFA was delivered at power of 10 W for 90 s per stricture segment, followed by balloon dilatation with/without stent placement., Results: All patients had immediate stricture improvements after RFA. No severe adverse event occurred except for one patient with mild post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. During median (SD) follow-up duration of 12.6 (3.9) months, BBS resolution without the need for further stenting was achieved in four patients whereas two patients had stent(s) in situ waiting scheduled removal. However, one patient had stricture relapse after initial resolution, one underwent surgery, and another patient died of other cause., Conclusions: Endobiliary RFA appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of BBS, especially for refractory cases. Further studies are warranted., (© 2014 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2014 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background: Esophagectomy is the conventional treatment for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer. Endotherapy is an alternative treatment., Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of these 2 treatments., Design: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and momentous meeting abstracts were searched. Studies comparing endotherapy with esophagectomy were included in the meta-analysis. Pooling was conducted in a random-effects model., Setting: Tertiary-care facility., Patients: Seven studies involving 870 patients were included., Intervention: Endotherapy and esophagectomy., Main Outcome Measurements: Neoplasia remission rate, neoplasia recurrence rate, overall survival rate, neoplasia-related death, and major adverse events., Results: Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between endotherapy and esophagectomy in the neoplasia remission rate (relative risk [RR] 0.96; 95% CI, 0.91-1.01); overall survival rate at 1 year (RR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.03), 3 years (RR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96-1.10), and 5 years (RR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93-1.06); and neoplasia-related mortality (risk difference [RD] 0; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.01). Endotherapy was associated with a higher neoplasia recurrence rate (RR 9.50; 95% CI, 3.26-27.75) and fewer major adverse events (RR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.73)., Limitations: Relatively small number of retrospective studies available, different types of endoscopic treatments were used., Conclusion: Endotherapy and esophagectomy show similar efficacy except in the neoplasia recurrence rate, which is higher after endotherapy. Prospective, randomized, controlled trials are needed to confirm these results., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endoscopic ablation of duodenal ampullary malignancy has not been fully assessed.Aims: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograpy (ERCP)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for inoperable ampullary cancer.Methods: Patients with inoperable ampullary cancer underwent ERCP-guided RFA from January 2012 to August 2017. RF energy (7-10 W) was delivered using bipolar RFA electrodes under endoscopic guidance. RFAs were repeated every 1-3 months until visible tumor was eliminated. All patients were followed up till June 2018, during which any biliary event was noted and managed endoscopically.Results: Twenty-three patients underwent a median of two RFA sessions (range 1-6) at a median interval of 56 (range 35-90) days. Among 18 (78.3%) patients who received endoscopic re-evaluations, nine patients showed no remaining lesion and nine showed more than 50% tumor size reduction. During a median follow-up duration of 517 days (range 60-1836 days), eight (34.8%) patients required endoscopic re-interventions. The re-intervention rate at 6 months after RFA was 36.8%. Twelve patients were alive, among whom six required no biliary stenting. The accumulative mean survival was 1081 (95% CI 757.8-1404.0) days. RFA-related adverse events occurred in four cases (7.7%) including mild pancreatitis (1), bleeding (1), and late distal biliary stenosis (2).Conclusion: This pilot study shows that ERCP-guided RFA is safe to use and able to reduce tumor volume and re-interventions in patients with inoperable ampullary cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]