Search

Liver and pulmonary metastases (PMs) are relatively common in patients with colorectal cancer. The majority of metastases are suitable for surgical resection, and the effectiveness of metastasectomy is usually assessed based on overall survival (OS). Metastasectomy provides a mean 5-year OS rate of approximately 50%, but the results are better in patients with liver metastases compared to those with PMs. Unfortunately, the presence of bilateral or multiple PMs represents a relative contraindication to surgical metastasectomy. Unresectable PMs can be safely treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation or radiotherapy, but the reported results vary widely. Several clinical prognostic factors affecting OS after metastasectomy have been reported, such as number of PMs, hilar or mediastinal lymph node involvement, disease-free interval, age and gender, resection margins, size of the metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration, and histological type of the primary cancer. The accurate evaluation of all clinical prognostic factors, circulating and immunohistochemical markers, and the study of gene mutational status will lead to a more accurate selection of patients scheduled to metastasectomy, with the aim of improving outcome., (Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Liver metastases (LM) are crucial prognostic manifestation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), management of metastatic GIST has radically changed. Long clinical follow-up provides an increased proportion of GIST patients with LM who are candidates for potentially curative therapy., Material and Methods: Patients who underwent treatment for liver metastases of GIST between 2000-2009 in our department were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 84 months (range 40-145) months. In retrospective analysis we investigated clinical, macro-/microscopic and immunohistochemical criteria, surgical, interventional and TKI therapy as well., Results: In 87 GIST-patients we identified 25 (29%) patients with metastatic disease. Of these, 12 patients (14%) suffered from LM with a mean age of 60.5 (range, 35-75) years. Primary GIST were located at stomach (n = 4, 33%) or small intestine (n = 8, 67%); all of them expressed CD117 and/or CD34. LM were multiple (83%), distributed in both lobes (67%). They were detected synchronously with primary tumor in 33% and metachronously in 77%. All patients with liver involvement were considered to treatment with TKI. LM were resected (R0) in 4 patients (33%). In recurrent (2/4) and TKI resistant cases, interventional treatment (radiofrequency ablation) and TKI escalation were carried out. During a median follow-up of 84 months (range 30-152), 2 patients died (16.5%) for progressive disease and one patient for other reasons. Nine patients (75%) were alive., Conclusion: Treatment of LM from GIST needs a multimodal approach. TKI-therapy is required at any case. In case of respectability, surgery must be carried out. In unresectable cases or recurrent/progressive disease, interventional treatment or TKI escalation should be considered. Therefore, these patients need to be treated in experienced centres, where multimodal approaches are established.

Background: Minimal invasive methods are needed as an alternative to surgery for treatment of lung metastases., Patients and Methods: The prospective database of two cancer centers including all consecutive patients treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for lung metastasis over 8 years was reviewed. RFA was carried out under general anesthesia, with computed tomography guidance using a 15-gauge multitined expandable electrodes RF needle., Results: Five hundred sixty-six patients including 290 men (51%), 62.7 ± 13.2 years old with primary tumor to the colon (34%), rectum (18%), kidney (12%), soft tissue (9%) and miscellaneous (27%) received 642 RFA for 1037 lung metastases. Fifty-three percent of patients had 1 metastasis, 25% had 2, 14% had 3, 5% had 4 and 4% had 5-8. Metastases were unilateral (75%), or bilateral (25%). The median diameter [extremes] of metastases was 15 mm (4-70). Twenty-two percent of patients had extrapulmonary disease amenable to local therapy including 49 liver, 16 bone and 60 miscellaneous metastases. Median follow-up was 35.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 62 months. Four-year local efficacy was 89%. Four-year lung disease control rate was 44.1%, with patient retreated safely up to four times. Primary origin, disease-free interval, size and number of metastases were associated with OS in multivariate analysis. Progression at RFA site was associated with poor OS [P = 0.011, hazard ratio (HR): 1.69 (95% confidence interval 1.13-2.54)]. In the 293 colorectal cancer metastases, size >2 cm (HR = 2.10, P = 0.0027) and a number of metastases ≥3 (HR = 1.86, P = 0.011) remained significantly associated with OS. A prognostic score made of three groups based on the four above-mentioned prognostic factors demonstrated 3-year OS rates of respectively 82.2%, 69.5% and 53.6% (log-rank test, P ≤ 0.0001) among the three groups in the overall population, and of 81.3%, 72.8% and 57.9% (log-rank test, P = 0.005) in the colorectal cancer patients., Conclusion: Radiofrequency is an option for treatment of small size lung metastases, namely the ones below 2-3 cm., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Aim: To compare outcomes from radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatectomy for treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM)., Methods: From January 2000 to December 2009, 408 patients underwent curative intent treatment for CRLM. We excluded patients using the criteria: size of CRLM > 3 cm, number of CRLM ≥ 5, percutaneous RFA, follow-up period < 12 mo, double primary cancer, or treatment with both RFA and hepatectomy. We matched 51 patients who underwent RFA with 102 patients who underwent hepatectomy by propensity scores., Results: The median follow-up period was 45 mo (range, 12 mo to 158 mo). Hepatic recurrence was more frequent in the RFA than the hepatectomy group (P = 0.021) although extrahepatic recurrence curves were similar (P = 0.716). Survival curves of hepatectomy group were better than that of RFA for multiple, large (> 2 cm) CRLM (P = 0.034). However, survival curves were similar for single or small (≤ 2 cm) CRLM (P = 0.714, P = 0.740)., Conclusion: Hepatectomy is better than RFA for the treatment of CRLM. However, RFA might be suitable for selected patients with single, small (≤ 2 cm) CRLM.

Background: The best management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer is still debated and little is known about the true impact of treatments on survival., Materials and Methods: The study involved 122 patients (77 males), aged 64.0 ± 11.0 years (range: 27.8-86.1) at diagnosis of liver metastatization (synchronous in 59). All underwent chemotherapy and at least one procedure of radiofrequency ablation; 53 also had partial hepatic resections. Demographics, tumor characteristics and survival outcomes from liver metastatization were analyzed with univariate and multivariate techniques. This analysis was performed also taking into account relative survival as the best estimate of specific survival., Results: The analysis with observed survival selected the categorized number of involved lymph nodes in the colorectal specimens as the only statistically significant predictor, while the analysis with relative survival also showed site of the primary tumor (above the sigmoid colon or otherwise) and number of liver metastases as significant factors. The standardized mortality ratio was 9.673 (95% CI: 7.668-11.663) and a total of 201.85 years of life were lost in comparison with the survival of the reference population., Conclusions: The computation of relative survival – better than observed survival – selected a more adequate number of predictors, making investigation of even limited series of patients with confounding factors reliable. The finding that prognosis was mainly dependent on the anatomical presentation of the primary tumor and of liver metastases – instead of treatments – could explain the still contrasting opinions on the role of the available therapies in this field.

Background: Intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (IRFA) is added to surgery to obtain hepatic clearance of liver metastases. Complications occurring in IRFA should differ from those associated with wedge or anatomic liver resection., Methods: Patients with liver metastases treated with IRFA from 2000 to 2010 were retrospectively analysed. Postoperative outcomes are reported according to the Clavien-Dindo system of classification., Results: A total of 151 patients underwent 173 procedures for 430 metastases. Of these, 97 procedures involved IRFA plus liver resection and 76 involved IRFA only. The median number of lesions treated by IRFA was two (range: 1-11). A total of 123 (71.1%) procedures were carried out in patients who had received preoperative chemotherapy. The mortality rate was 1.2%. Thirty (39.5%) IRFA-only patients and 45 (46.4%) IRFA-plus-resection patients presented complications. Immediate complications (n = 4) were associated with IRFA plus resection. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, previous abdominal surgery or hepatic resection, body mass index, number of IRFA procedures, portal pedicle clamping, total vascular exclusion and preoperative chemotherapy were not associated with a greater number of complications of Grade III or higher severity. Length of surgery >4 h [odds ratio (OR) 2.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.3; P < 0.05] and an associated contaminating procedure (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.53-9.06; P < 0.005) led to a greater frequency of complications of Grade III or higher., Conclusions: Mortality and morbidity after IRFA, with or without resection, are low. Nevertheless, long interventions and concurrent bowel operations increase the risk for septic complications., (© 2014 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.)

Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively outcomes after radiofrequency (RF) ablation for pulmonary metastases from esophageal cancer., Materials and Methods: This study included 21 consecutive patients who met inclusion criteria (all men; mean age, 66.0 y) and had pulmonary metastases from esophageal cancer. There were 31 tumors (mean size, 1.7 cm) that were treated with 27 planned ablation sessions. At the initial RF ablation sessions, 3 patients had viable extrapulmonary recurrences, and 18 patients had viable recurrences confined to the lung. Primary study endpoints included patient survival and the determination of prognostic factors. Secondary endpoints included local efficacy and safety of the treatment. The log-rank test was used to identify prognostic factors. Adverse events were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0., Results: Median follow-up duration after the initial RF ablation was 22.4 months (range, 6.2-76.1 mo). Estimated overall survival rates were 85.7% at 1 year, 54.8% at 2 years, and 38.4% at 3 years after the initial RF ablation session. The presence of viable extrapulmonary recurrences at the initial RF ablation session was an unfavorable prognostic factor (P < .001). Local tumor progression was observed in 25.8% (8 of 31) of tumors and occurred 2.6-10.0 months (median, 4.8 mo) after RF ablation. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 7.4% (2 of 27) of sessions, including pleural effusion requiring chest tube placement and pneumoderma requiring surgical intervention. No grade 4 or greater adverse events occurred., Conclusions: RF ablation is a promising treatment option for patients with pulmonary metastases from esophageal cancer., (Copyright © 2014 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) causes focal coagulation necrosis in tissue. Its first clinical application was reported in 2000, and RFA has since been commonly used in both primary and metastatic lung cancer. The procedure is typically performed using computed tomography guidance, and the techniques for introducing the electrode to the tumor are simple and resemble those used in percutaneous lung biopsy. The most common complication is pneumothorax, which occurs in up to 50% of procedures; chest tube placement for pneumothorax is required in up to 25% of procedures. Other severe complications, such as pleural effusion requiring chest tube placement, infection, and nerve injury, are rare. The local efficacy depends on tumor size, and local progression after RFA is not rare, occurring in 10% or more of patients. The local progression rate is particularly high for tumors > 3 cm. Repeat RFA may be used to treat local progression. Short- to mid-term survival after RFA appears promising and is approximately 85%-95% at 1 year and 45%-55% at 3 years. Long-term survival data are sparse. Better survival may be expected for patients with small metastasis, low carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and/or no extrapulmonary metastasis. The notable advantages of RFA are that it is simple and minimally invasive; preserves pulmonary function; can be repeated; and is applicable regardless of previous treatments. Its most substantial limitation is limited local efficacy. Although surgery is still the method of choice for treatment with curative intent, the ultimate application of RFA may be to replace metastasectomy for small metastases. Randomized trials comparing RFA with surgery are needed.

The lung is one of the most common targets of metastases from gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Surgical treatment (i.e., metastasectomy) is an accepted therapeutic option for pulmonary metastases from GI cancers. However, surgery may be contraindicated in advanced stages of cancer, compromised lung function, and/or comorbidities. This issue has prompted the search for innovative and less invasive ways of treating pulmonary metastases. Image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has attracted great interest as a minimally invasive approach against intrathoracic malignancies. In this technique, radiofrequency energy is applied via a needle electrode inserted into the target tissue. As the cells are agitated by the applied energy, they release heat, causing denaturation and cell death. Recently, this technique has been used on patients with pulmonary metastatic disease arising from GI cancers such as colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as on patients with primary lung cancer. The present review updates the clinical outcomes and advances in RFA therapy of lung metastases from GI cancers.

Purpose: Isolated liver metastases (LMs) from breast cancer (BC) occur in only 1-3% of the cases. Resection of isolated LMs improves survival. We examined the prognostic factors for time to LM development, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after BCLM resection., Methods: From 2006 to 2009, 32 patients underwent LM resection. All of them had breast cancer surgery for their primary tumor and developed resectable LMs as the first and only site of disease progression., Results: LMs developed after a median of 25 months. With a median follow up of 37 months (range 7-66) after metastases resection, median DFS and OS (with 95% CI) were 22.5 (12-40) and 37 (≥23) months, respectively. Tumor size ≥3 vs <3 cm and adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with shorter time to LM development (p<0.01 for both parameters). These parameters and BC negative estrogen (ER)/ progesterone receptors (PR) (ER?/PR? vs other) were related with shorter DFS. Positive (vs negative) axillary lymph nodes and BC negative ER/ PR (ER?/PR? vs other) status correlated with shorter OS (p<0.01 for both parameters). A period to metastases development ≥ 24 months (vs ≤24) and single (vs multiple) metastases were related with longer DFS and OS (p<0.01 for both conditions)., Conclusion: Despite the relatively small number of patients in this study, we believe that positive ER/PR status for both BC and LMs, negative axillary lymph nodes, time to liver metastases development >24 months and single liver metastases predict longer DFS and OS after LM resection.

Background/aims: Due to different biological characteristics of non-colorectal liver metastasizes (NCLM), surgical treatment, especially it´s long term results, is a topic of discussion. The aim of the study was to evaluate the single center experience with surgical treatment of NCLM., Methodology: Seventy two patients were prospectively included. The average length of time after the primary surgery was 3.9 years (0-8.5 years). RFA prevailed -50 patients (69.4%), resection presenting 30.6%. Preoperative chemotherapeutical downstaging or portal vein embolization was performed on 12 patients (16.7%). Resectable or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatable extrahepatic metastasizes were removed in 26 patients (36.1%)., Results: One, three and five years patient survival after the liver resection or RFA was 88.6, 72.5 and 36.9%. The best survival rate was in patients with carcinoid (5 years-100%), breast cancer (5 years-33.8%), renal carcinoma (3 years-44.4% ) and gynecological tumors metastasizes (2 years-72.9%). With regards to long-term survival of patients, we did not find any statistically significant difference between RFA and resection. Patients with extrahepatic metastasizes had worse prognosis (p<0.01)., Conclusions: Liver resection and RFA in NCLM have an unambiguous place in multi-modal curative strategy. The decision for surgical treatment of patients suffering from NCLM, is strictly individual with the aim of achieving qualitative long-term survival.