Search

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, health care utilization, and safety of a same-day discharge protocol., Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common ablation performed. Increasing volumes of AF ablation are placing demands on hospital resources. In response, our institutions developed a same-day discharge protocol for AF ablation., Methods: This was a multicenter cohort study of all patients undergoing AF ablation from 2010 to 2014 at 2 major centers. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of successful same-day discharges. The primary health care utilization outcome was 30-day hospital readmission for any reason. The primary safety outcome was a composite of 30-day death, stroke/transient ischemic attack or embolism, or bleeding requiring hospitalization., Results: A total of 3,054 patients underwent AF ablation from 2010 to 2014 and met inclusion criteria. Same-day discharge was achieved in 79.2% (2,418 of 3,054). Hospital readmission at 30 days was 7.7% for the same-day discharge group, 10.2% for those who remained in the hospital overnight without complications (p = 0.055 for comparison with same-day discharge), and 19.5% (p < 0.001) for those who remained in the hospital with procedural complications (7.7%). Complication rates from discharge to 30 days (excluding immediate procedural complications) were 0.37% for the same-day discharge group, 0.36% (p = 0.999) for those kept overnight without complications, and 2.5% (p = 0.044) for those with initial procedural complications., Conclusions: Same-day discharge after AF ablation is feasible in the majority of patients with use of a standardized protocol. This approach was not associated with higher hospital readmission or complication rates after discharge., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) has been performed by many techniques with varying success rates. This may be due to ablation techniques, patient demographics, comorbidities, and trial design. We conducted a meta-regression of studies of PsAF ablation to elucidate the factors affecting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence., Methods and Results: Databases were searched for prospective studies of PsAF ablation. A meta-regression was performed. Fifty-eight studies (6767 patients) were included. Complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation reduced freedom from AF by 8.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) -15 to -2.3, P = 0.009). Left atrial appendage [LAA isolation (three study arms)] increased freedom from AF by 39.5% (95% CI 9.1-78.4, P = 0.008). Posterior wall isolation (PWI) (eight study arms) increased freedom from AF by 19.4% (95% CI 3.3-38.1, P = 0.017). Linear ablation or ganglionated plexi ablation resulted in no significant effect on freedom from AF. More extensive ablation increased intraprocedural AF termination; however, intraprocedural AF termination was not associated with improved outcomes. Increased left atrial diameter was associated with a reduction in freedom from AF by 4% (95% CI -6.8% to -1.1%, P = 0.007) for every 1 mm increase in diameter., Conclusion: Linear ablation, PWI, and CFAE ablation improves intraprocedural AF termination, but such termination does not predict better long-term outcomes. Study arms including PWI or LAA isolation in the lesion set were associated with improved outcomes in terms of freedom from AF; however, further randomized trials are required before these can be routinely recommended. Left atrial size is the most important marker of AF chronicity influencing outcomes., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: STOP AF PAS (Sustained Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Post-Approval Study) is the first prospective, multicenter, 3-year study in North America to assess long-term safety and effectiveness of the cryoballoon for treatment of patients with drug-refractory symptomatic pAF., Background: The STOP AF PAS was required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration at the time of approval of the first-generation cryoballoon for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF). The second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) was commercially released shortly after this trial was initiated., Methods: The study was nonrandomized. Enrollment was completed with 344 eligible patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the CB2. Procedure-related safety and freedom from AF and symptomatic atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia through 3 years were determined. Documented atrial arrhythmias ≥30 s were considered treatment failures., Results: Acute PVI was achieved in 99.3% (1,341 of 1,350) of veins. Mean follow-up was 34 ± 7 months. The rate of major complications was 5.8%, including a 3.2% rate of phrenic nerve injury, which resolved in all but 1 patient by 36 months. At 36 months, 11.7% of patients were prescribed antiarrhythmic agents, inclusive of "pill-in-the-pocket" administration. Freedom from AF was 81.6% at 12 months, 73.8% at 24 months, and 68.1% at 36 months. Freedom from AF and symptomatic atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia was 79.0% at 12 months, 70.8% at 24 months, and 64.1% at 36 months. Freedom from a repeat ablation procedure was 80.9% at 36 months., Conclusions: PVI using the CB2 was an effective treatment for patients with pAF, with freedom from all atrial arrhythmias of 64% at 36 months. (Sustained Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Post-Approval Study [STOP AF PAS]; NCT01456949)., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We tested whether ablation methodology and study design can explain the varying outcomes in terms of atrial fibrillation (AF)-free survival at 1 year., Background: There have been numerous paroxysmal AF ablation trials, which are heterogeneous in their use of different ablation techniques and study design. A useful approach to understanding how these factors influence outcome is to dismantle the trials into individual arms and reconstitute them as a large meta-regression., Methods: Data were collected from 66 studies (6941 patients). With freedom from AF as the dependent variable, we performed meta-regression using the individual study arm as the unit., Results: Success rates did not change regardless of the technique used to produce pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Neither was adjunctive lesion sets associated with any improvement in outcome. Studies that included more males and fewer hypertensive patients were found more likely to report better outcomes. The electrocardiography method selected to assess outcome also plays an important role. Outcomes were worse in studies that used regular telemonitoring (by 23%; P < 0.001) or in patients who had implantable loop recorders (by 21%; P = 0.006), rather than those with the less thorough periodic Holter monitoring., Conclusions: Outcomes of AF ablation studies involving PVI are not affected by the technologies used to produce PVI. Neither do adjunctive lesion sets change the outcome. Achieving high success rates in these studies appears to be dependent more on patient mix and on the thoroughness of AF detection protocols. These should be carefully considered when quoting the success rates of AF ablation procedures that are derived from such studies., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Although the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) progressively increases with age, the vast majority of AF ablation is done in middle-aged patients. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of catheter ablation in patients older than 65 years of age with paroxysmal and persistent AF., Methods: Out of a total of 230 consecutive AF ablation procedures, 45 patients were older than 65 years of age and underwent 53 procedures. The ablation strategy consisted of wide-area circumferential lines around both ipsilateral pulmonary veins using a three-dimensional mapping system., Results: The mean age was 69 ± 3.5 years (35 males). The mean duration for AF was 8.7 ± 6.5 years. Thirty-nine had paroxysmal and six persistent AF despite use of 1.38 ± 0.77 antiarrhythmic drugs. All patients had a structurally normal heart. Eleven had systemic hypertension. Mean procedure time was 187 ± 33 min. Acute procedural success rate with abolition of all pulmonary vein potentials was achieved in all patients. Pericardial tamponade requiring percutaneous drainage occurred in one (1.9%) patient. There were no cardioembolic events. Among the 43 patients whose clinical outcome was assessed at 6 months, 34 (79%) had a significant reduction (>90%) of the total symptomatic AF burden, compared to pre-ablation, with a complete lack of symptomatic AF in 32 (74%) patients. The success rate was higher for patients with paroxysmal versus persistent AF (81 vs. 67%). Six patients (11%) underwent repeat procedures., Conclusions: Catheter ablation is a safe and effective treatment for patients over the age of 65 years with symptomatic, drug-refractory AF. Therefore, patients should not be excluded from undergoing AF catheter ablation on the basis of age alone.

Introduction: Percutaneous catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a procedure performed typically in an inpatient setting. The feasibility and safety of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF were evaluated on an outpatient basis., Methods: 230 AF ablation procedures were performed in 206 patients (74% male; mean age 56+/-9 years). Patients were admitted to the hospital outpatient facility in the morning for the AF ablation procedure on the same day. The ablation strategy consisted of wide area circumferential lines around both ipsilateral pulmonary veins. After monitoring in the outpatient service, patients were discharged on the same day, if they were clinically stable., Results: Mean procedure time was 201+/-31 min. Major complications occurred in seven patients (3%). One patient (0.4%) suffered a minor stroke and six patients had pericardial tamponade requiring percutaneous drainage. Patients could be discharged on the same day following 205 (89%) procedures. Among the 148 patients whose clinical outcome was assessed at 6 months, 127 (86%) had a reduction of the total symptomatic AF episodes, compared to pre-ablation, with a complete lack of symptoms in 101 patients (68%)., Conclusion: Catheter ablation of AF on the day of admission is feasible and safe with a low risk of complications. The vast majority of the patients can be discharged on the same day.

Purpose of Review: The optimal treatments for atrial fibrillation have long been sought among rhythm control and rate control strategies. Unfortunately, rhythm control strategies with antiarrhythmic drugs have proven to be a disappointment. Catheter ablation techniques, however, have been rapidly advancing and have the potential to offer a permanent cure. Rhythm control with catheter ablation may in fact be a superior treatment modality for atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence in favor of this argument., Recent Findings: The dissatisfaction with poorly performing antiarrhythmic drug therapies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation has fueled the development of alternative therapies for rhythm control. Catheter ablation has emerged as a viable, efficacious, and safe alternative. In fact, in head to head comparisons with antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation continues to come out on top with often markedly superior performances. In addition to efficacy and safety, catheter ablation also seems to be a fiscally viable alternative., Summary: On the basis of the outstanding performance of catheter ablation compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy, it is not surprising to see its widespread adoption and ever expanding indications.

Aims: Small elevations in troponin T levels have been shown with limited radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedures for supraventricular tachycardia, usually to levels below the threshold for ischaemia or infarction. Left atrial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) requires far more RF energy, therefore could be expected to have greater elevation in troponin T. We determined troponin T levels before and after ablation in these patients to evaluate the amount of rise with this ablation., Methods: All patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) from May 2004 to October 2004 had troponin T levels measured 4 h following completion of the procedure. The first 30 patients also had a troponin T level measured 1 h prior to PVI to establish a baseline reference., Results: Sixty patients were studied, with 81.7% males and a mean age of 54.6 +/- 9.9 years. No patient had underlying structural heart disease. The baseline troponin T level was normal (<0.01 microg/L) in all 30 patients. Post-procedure troponin T levels were elevated in all 60 patients compared with baseline (P < 0.05), with a mean level of 0.85 microg/L and a range of 0.26-1.57 microg/L after an average RF ablation time of 56 +/- 15 min. All levels were above the reference range for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (>0.15 microg/L). Troponin T level was not related to the number of RF lesions, RF time, procedure time, or associated external cardioversion., Conclusions: Troponin T elevations occurred in all patients undergoing PVI, to levels at least 20 times the normal concentration, into the range for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, troponin T would not be specific for ischaemia in the setting of chest pain post-catheter ablation for AF.