Search

Purpose: To determine the pathologic response of computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation as bridging therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplant, and its subsequent effect on survival., Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 patients (M:F = 50:12) with mean age of 59.6 years ± 7.2 months (SD). Sixty-four total MWA procedures were performed for hepatocellular carcinomas within Milan criteria as bridging therapy to subsequent orthotopic liver transplant between August 2014 and September 2018. The pathology reports of the explanted livers were reviewed to assess for residual disease. Residual disease was categorized as complete or incomplete necrosis. Patient demographics, tumor/procedural characteristics, and laboratory values were evaluated. Survival from time of ablation and time of transplantation were recorded and compared between cohorts using log rank tests., Results: The mean tumor size was 2.4 cm ± 0.7 cm (SD), (range = 1-4.6 cm). 32 (50%) cases required hydrodissection. Histopathologic necrosis was seen in 66% of cases at time of liver transplantation. Median time to liver transplant post-MWA was 12.6 months. [IQR = 8.6-14.8 months]. The median survival from ablation was 60.8 months [IQR = 45.5-73.7 months], and the median survival from transplant was 49.3 months [IQR = 33.7-60.1 months]. There was no significant difference in survival for patients with complete versus incomplete necrosis from ablation or liver transplant (p = 0.49, p = 0.46, respectively)., Conclusions: Computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation is an effective bridge to orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma., Cebm Level of Evidence: Level 3, non-randomized controlled cohort study/follow-up study., (© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).)

Purpose: To compare the amount of sedation medication administered during radiofrequency (RF) ablation versus cryoablation of small renal masses., Materials and Methods: Records were retrospectively reviewed in patients who underwent percutaneous computed tomography-guided RF ablation and cryoablation of small renal masses from January 2002 to June 2011 for patient and tumor characteristics, amount of medications used for moderate sedation, and complications. Sedation was performed by giving patients titrated doses of midazolam and fentanyl. Additional medications were given if the desired level of sedation was not achieved., Results: There were 116 patients who underwent 136 ablation procedures; 71 patients underwent RF ablation, and 65 patients underwent cryoablation. RF ablation was associated with a significantly higher mean dose of fentanyl (mean dose for RF ablation, 236.43 μg; mean dose for cryoablation, 172.27 μg; P<.001). RF ablation was also associated with a higher mean dose of midazolam (mean dose for RF ablation, 4.5 mg; mean dose for cryoablation, 3.27 mg; P<.001). In the RF ablation group, two patients required additional sedation with droperidol. As a result of oversedation, two patients in the RF ablation cohort required sedation reversal with naloxone and flumazenil. None of the patients who underwent cryoablation required sedation reversal. No other sedation-related complications occurred., Conclusions: Cryoablation of small renal masses was performed with less sedation medication than RF ablation. This finding suggests renal cryoablation is less painful than RF ablation; however, prospective studies with validated pain scales are needed to confirm these results., (Copyright © 2013 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To examine the effect of percutaneous thermal ablation of renal masses on renal function among patients with baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Materials and Methods: Patients with baseline CKD (initial glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) who underwent percutaneous cryoablation or radiofrequency (RF) ablation of renal masses were reviewed., Results: A total of 48 patients with a GRF of 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or lower were treated with renal cryoablation or RF ablation and had follow-up GFR measurement 1 month afterward. Mean patient age was 73 years (range, 47-89 y). Cryoablation was performed in 22 patients and RF ablation was performed in 26. Mean tumor diameter was 3.4 cm (range, 0.9-10.2 cm). Mean overall GFRs were 39.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at baseline and 39.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 month after ablation (P = .85). A total of 38 patients had 1-year follow-up GFR measurement (cryoablation, n = 18; RF ablation, n = 20), and their mean GFR was 40.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ± 11.4 (SD), compared with a preablation GFR of 41.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2)(P = .79). In the cryoablation group, mean GFRs at 1 month and 1 year were 41.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 44.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2), compared with respective baseline GFRs of 41.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 42.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = .75 and P = .19, respectively). In the RF ablation group, mean GFRs at 1 month and 1 year were 38.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 37.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2), compared with respective baseline GFRs of 38.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 40.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = .58 and P = .09, respectively)., Conclusions: Independent of ablation modality, percutaneous renal mass ablation does not appear to affect renal function among patients with CKD., (Copyright © 2012 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)