Search

Background: Enumeration of CD4+ T-lymphocytes is important in the management of HIV. However, standard laboratory systems based on flow cytometry are expensive, complicated, and thus unavailable to most resource-limited settings where a low-cost and fully automated point-of-care CD4 testing system is required. In attempts to address this issue, a study was conducted to validate the Alere PIMA point-of-care CD4 test., Method: Duplicate values of the absolute number of CD4+ T-lymphocytes in 203 HIV-infected blood samples obtained using the PIMA system were compared with the two predicate single-platform FACSCount and the dual-platform FACSCan (Becton Dickinson Biosciences)., Results: The overall absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count obtained using the PIMA system correlated highly with the FACSCount (r = 0.957; mean bias, -54.2 cells/μL; limit of agreement, -190.9 to +82.5 cells/μL) and the FACSCan (r = 0.957; mean bias -44.0 cells/μL; limit of agreement, -179.7 to +91.6 cells/μL). Good correlation and low biases were also observed for samples with CD4+ T-lymphocyte count ranges of 0 to 200 and 0 to 350 cells/μL. Additionally, there was no significant difference in absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts noted between the duplicate samples using the PIMA system., Conclusions: This new point-of-care product is a simple and reliable system and should contribute significantly to the simplification of performing CD4 testing and thus increase access for patients in resource-limited settings. The inability to obtain values for the frequency (%) of CD4+ T-lymphocyte count is one limitation of the PIMA system, the addition of which would be of value for clinical staging or monitoring in HIV-infected pediatric patients.

Enumeration of CD4+ T lymphocytes is important in management of HIV-infected patients. However, CD4 testing by current gold standard bead-based flow cytometer (FCM) system is expensive for developing countries. This study compared 2 affordable volumetric FCMs with the 3 predicate FCM systems. CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts on blood samples from 150 HIV-1-infected Thai patients were determined in parallel by 5 FCM systems: the 2 single-platform volumetric FCM systems, Guava and CyFlow(green); the 2 standard single-platform bead-based systems (2-color FACSCount and the TriTEST/TruCOUNT tube using a FACSCalibur FCM); and the dual-platform TriTEST system. Correlation and agreement were analyzed using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Results from these 2 volumetric systems gave similar results and excellent correlation: R2 > 0.93; mean biases ranged from +6.3 to +24.1 cells per microliter more for the Guava. In contrast, the CyFlow(green) showed the lowest values with R2 > 0.97; mean biases ranged from -9.8 to -27.6 cells per microliter. This indicates that the absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts determined by CyFlow(green) are < FACSCount < DP TriTEST < TriTEST/TruCOUNT < Guava. Although the use of these 2 volumetric FCMs could make CD4+ T-lymphocyte enumeration more affordable in resource-poor settings, variations among these systems should be considered if these are to be interchanged.

Background: Absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts are used in the initiation and monitoring of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients. Becton Dickinson's (BD) FACSCount system was introduced 12 years ago as a dedicated instrument for enumeration of absolute CD4+ T-lymphocytes. However, this system does not provide percent CD4+ T-lymphocyte that is the required monitoring parameter in pediatric patients. We evaluated a new BD FACSCount CD4 software and reagents for simultaneous percent and absolute CD4+ T-lymphocytes in HIV-infected blood., Methods: Percent and absolute CD4+ T-lymphocytes in 149 HIV-infected blood samples were determined using a new FACSCount system. Results of percent and absolute CD4+ T-lymphocytes were compared between the dual-platform (DP) method, using BD FACScan flow cytometer plus hematology analyzer and the standard FACSCount system. Correlation and agreement were analyzed using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis., Results: Percent CD4+ T-lymphocyte values obtained from the new FACSCount system correlated well with DP FACScan method (r2 = 0.977, P < 0.0001). Mean bias was only -0.36% [limit of agreement (LOA): -2.52% to +1.80%] and percent similarity was 101.36%. For absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte, the new system correlated highly with standard FACSCount system (r2 = 0.986, P < 0.0001), with a percent similarity of 98.2. Mean bias was +3.39 cells/microl with LOA of -52.53 cells/mul to +59.31 cells/microl., Conclusion: This new FACSCount system is a simple and reliable system for enumeration of absolute and percent CD4+ T-lymphocytes. Having one system giving both results should reduce the cost and thus increase access to CD4 testing for pediatric and adult patients., (Copyright 2008 Clinical Cytometry Society.)

Background: Various assays are used to enumerate peripheral blood absolute CD4+ T-lymphocytes. Flow cytometry is considered the gold standard for this purpose. However, the high cost of available flow cytometers and monoclonal antibody reagents make it difficult to implement such methods in the resource-poor settings. In this study, we evaluated a cheaper, recently developed single-platform microcapillary cytometer for CD4+ T-lymphocyte enumeration, the personal cell analyzer (PCA), from Guava Technologies., Methods: CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte counts in whole blood samples from 250 HIV-1 infected Thais were determined, using a two-color reagent kit and the Guava PCA, and compared with the results obtained with two reference microbead-based methods from Becton Dickinson Biosciences: the three-color TruCOUNT tube method and the two-color FACSCount method. Statistical correlations and agreements were determined using linear correlation and Bland-Altman analysis., Results: Absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts obtained using the Guava PCA method highly correlated with those obtained using TruCOUNT method (R(2) = 0.95, mean bias +13.1 cells/microl, limit of agreement [LOA]-117.9 to +144.1 cells/microl) and the FACSCount method (R2 = 0.94, mean bias = +33.2 cells/microl, LOA-101.8 to +168.3 cells/microl). Absolute CD8+ T-lymphocyte counts obtained using the Guava PCA method also highly correlated with those obtained with the two reference methods (R(2) = 0.92 and 0.88, respectively)., Conclusion: This study shows that the enumeration of CD4+ T-lymphocytes using the Guava microcapillary cytometer PCA method performed well when compared with the two reference bead-based methods. However, like the two reference methods, this new method needs substantial technical expertise., (Copyright 2007 Clinical Cytometry Society.)

Background: The current method of CD4 enumeration in Thailand, based on the three-tube, three-color method recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is expensive and thus unavailable to most patients who have the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Less expensive, simpler protocols (i.e., PanLeucogating and primary CD4 gating) have been described but require more published validation data to gain widespread acceptance. We describe a multicenter evaluation of the PanLeucogating method., Methods: The PanLeucogating method using generic reagents was evaluated in comparison with the standard three-tube, three-color method using commercial reagents. Percentage of CD4+ T cells among lymphocytes and absolute CD4+ T-cell counts were determined in 611 HIV-infected individuals recruited from four sites. Linear regression and Bland-Altman tests were used for statistical analysis., Results: The correlation of percentage of CD4+ T cells and absolute CD4+ T-cell counts obtained with the PanLeucogating strategy and the standard predicate method was high (r2 = 0.96 and 0.95, respectively, for the entire study population and r2 > 0.95 and 0.93, respectively, for each study group). Absolute CD4+ T-cell counts of the overall study pool and of the two subdivisions of absolute CD4+ T-cell counts (i.e., 0-250 cells/microl and > 250 cells/microl) derived from the two methods demonstrated excellent agreement, with mean biases of +18 cells/microl, +11 cells/microl, and +24 cells/microl, respectively., Conclusions: These observations demonstrate that CD4 enumeration by PanLeucogating is reliable and can be performed to an identical standard in a quality-assured network of collaborating laboratories as a new cost-effective approach to HIV monitoring., (Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

In Thailand, over one million people have been infected with HIV since the beginning of the epidemic. This has created a great burden on the country's limited health care budget. Monitoring CD4+ T-lymphocytes is important to determine the success of any antiretroviral therapy as well as HIV vaccine trials. However, the high cost of CD4 counts makes monitoring of every HIV-infected patient impossible in Thailand. Therefore, the development of affordable strategies is necessary in order to allow more HIV infected persons to access CD4 testing to control the disease. The current standard methods for enumeration of CD4+ T-lymphocytes are performed on whole blood by flow cytometric immunophenotyping using the 6-tube 2-color and 3-tube 3-color panels recommended by the Centers for Diseases Control (CDC). In this study, percentage CD4+ T-lymphocyte values (from 142 HIV-seropositive patients and 26 anti-HIV negative adult blood donors) generated by the use of just 2 reagents (CD45/CD4) in a 1-tube 2-color panel employing side scatter/CD45 morphospectral gating were compared to those obtained by state of the art methods. We also compared the use of generic monoclonal antibody reagents with commercial reagents and found the results to be comparable with an overall correlation coefficient (r) of more than 0.95 for both CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes. Bland-Altman analysis of the mean CD4 values plotted against the difference in values between the generic reagents and the commercial reagents showed no bias. The 1-tube 2-color method using generic monoclonal antibody reagents potentially permits more affordable but reliable CD4 testing and therefore could increase access for more HIV-infected patients in resource-poor countries.