Search

Background and Objectives: Small intestinal lesions in coeliac disease (CD) have a variable severity. Early diagnosis of CD is important because treatment allows a normal psycho-physical development, especially in children, and can avoid associated disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of screening parameters for the detection and estimation of CD prevalence in first-degree relatives., Methods: The screening was performed in 338 first-degree relatives of 134 coeliac families. Questionnaires and a physical examination followed by haematological analyses and serologyfor IgA anti-endomysium (EMA)/IgA antigliadin (AGA) antibodies were used in orderto selectthe candidates for small-bowel biopsy. The small-bowel biopsy was indicated on the basis of clinical complaints, laboratory tests and serology performed in 96 (28%) of the study group., Results: CD was diagnosed in 17/96 cases. Six of the 17 showed total villous atrophy (VA) (Marsh IIIc), five subtotal VA (Marsh IIIb) and six partial VA (Marsh IIIa). EMA and AGA were strongly positive in the six patients whose intestinal biopsy showed total VA. However, only one coeliac out of the six patients with partial VA had positive EMA and AGA., Conclusion: A significant proportion of coeliacs may be missed if cases are screened by serology only. Although endomysial antibody assay has been reported as a highly sensitive and specific test for detection of CD, we argue that using only EMA and AGA in screening is not enough for investigation of the true prevalence of CD. A combination of clinical parameters as described in this study and laboratory/serological tests is an important and practical contribution to improving the detection rate of CD.

Background: It has been suggested that the amount of gluten intake in populations offers an explanation for differences in the epidemiology of coeliac disease. Investigations into first-degree relatives of coeliac disease patients have often shown that relatives exhibit intermediate features of coeliac disease, possibly due to a low gluten intake., Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the pattern of gluten consumption in the general Dutch population for different age and sex groups and for different product groups, and to investigate the daily gluten intake of first-degree relatives of coeliac disease patients., Methods: Questionnaires concerning the gluten intake of 55 first-degree relatives of coeliac disease patients were analysed. To determine the gluten intake of the general Dutch population, the results of a mass investigation were used. The amount of gluten in the gluten-rich products was estimated by multiplying the amount of vegetable proteins by 0.8., Results: The median daily gluten intake of the relatives was 12.9 g (range: 3.8-31.3). The mean daily gluten intake of the study population in the Netherlands was 1 3.1 g., Conclusion: The gluten intake of first-degree relatives of coeliac disease patients was the same as that of the general population. Thus, a low gluten intake apparently does not explain the aspecific presentation and prevalence of coeliac disease in first-degree relatives of coeliac disease patients.

Objective: To determine whether the sugar absorption test (SAT) during follow-up of patients with coeliac disease on a gluten-free diet (GFD) correlates with improvement of the villous architecture of the small intestine., Methods: The SAT was performed in coeliacs at diagnosis and during follow-up with GFD. For the SAT, a solution of lactulose (L) and mannitol (M) was given to the fasting patient and the L-M ratio calculated in a 5-hour urine sample by gas chromatography: ratios > 0.089 are considered abnormal. The solution was made hyperosmolar by adding sucrose (1560 mmol/l)., Results: The L-M ratio was 2-3 times higher at diagnosis than either at 8 months to 2 years gluten free, or beyond 2 years gluten free, consecutively. The L-M ratio (mean, range) was significantly higher in cases of biopsies with (sub)total villous atrophy (VA) (0.388, 0.062-0.804, n = 28), partial VA (0.240, 0.062-0.841, n = 18) and villous irregularity (0.143, 0.017-0.322, n = 29) than in case of normalized histology after GFD (0.085, 0.021-0.230, n = 19). The rate of normalization of functional integrity was slower in adults than in children, demonstrated by a combination of histology and SAT., Conclusion: The SAT correlates well with the degree of VA. It is important for daily clinical practice that the simple and non-invasive SAT can be used as an indicator of intestinal damage, thus influencing need for and timing of intestinal biopsies.