Search

Objectives: The performance of non‐invasive prenatal screening using cell‐free DNA testing of maternal blood in twin pregnancy is underevaluated, while serum marker‐based strategies yield poor results. This study aimed to assess the performance of non‐invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy as a first‐tier test. Secondary objectives were to assess its failure rate and factors associated with failure. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included twin pregnancies in which non‐invasive prenatal screening using cell‐free DNA was performed as the primary screening strategy between May 2017 and October 2019. We used the NIPT VeriSeq® test for in‐vitro diagnosis and set a fetal fraction cut‐off of 4% for monochorionic pregnancies and 8% for dichorionic ones. Clinical data and pregnancy outcome were collected from physicians or midwives via a questionnaire or were retrieved directly on‐site. We calculated the performance of non‐invasive cell‐free DNA screening for trisomy 21, analyzed its failure rate and assessed potentially associated factors. Results: Among 1885 twin pregnancies with follow‐up, there were six (0.32%) confirmed cases of trisomy 21. The sensitivity of non‐invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21 was 100% (95% CI, 54.1–100%) and the false‐positive rate was 0.23% (95% CI, 0.06–0.59%). The primary failure rate was 4.6%, with 4.0% being due to insufficient fetal fraction. A successful result was obtained for 65.4% of women who underwent a new blood draw, reducing the overall failure rate to 2.8%. Maternal body mass index, gestational age at screening as well as chorionicity were significantly associated with the risk of failure. Conclusion: This study provides further evidence of the high performance, at an extremely low false‐positive rate, of non‐invasive prenatal screening in twins as part of a primary screening strategy for trisomy 21. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveCell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a useful biomarker in various clinical contexts. Herein, we aimed to identify maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes associated with a failed NIPS test due to high cfDNA concentrations.MethodsA retrospective study of cases with high plasma cfDNA concentration in pregnant women in which NIPS test was performed (from 174,318 cases). We reported the detection of 126 cases (118 with complete clinical information) in which the high amount of cfDNA did not allow the performance of NIPS and study the possible causes of this result.Results622 (0.35%) of 174,318 pregnant women had failed the NIPS test, including 126 (20.3%) cases with high plasma cfDNA concentrations. The failed NIPS due to high plasma cfDNA concentrations was associated with maternal diseases and treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Further follow-up of the 118 pregnant women in the case group revealed that the pregnancy outcomes included 31 premature deliveries, 21 abortions. The cfDNA concentrations of pregnant women with preterm deliveries were 1.15 (0.89, 1.84), which differed significantly from those who had full-term deliveries.ConclusionsAmong pregnant women with high cfDNA concentrations, systemic autoimmune diseases, pregnancy complications and LMWH were associated with increased incidence of failed NIPS test. High maternal cfDNA concentrations may not be associated with chromosomal abnormalities in the fetus. However, they should be alerted to the possibility of preterm births and stillbirths. Further clinical studies on pregnant women with high cfDNA concentrations are required.

Background and aims: X-linked ichthyosis (XLI) is a common recessive genetic disease caused by the deletion of steroid sulfatase (STS) in Xp22.31. Maternal copy-number deletions in Xp22.31 (covering STS) can be considered an incidental benefit of genome-wide cell-free DNA profiling. Here, we explored the accuracy and clinical value of maternal deletions in Xp22.31 during non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). Materials and methods: We evaluated 13,156 pregnant women who completed NIPS. The maternal deletions in Xp22.31 revealed by NIPS were confirmed with maternal white blood cells by chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) or copynumber variation sequencing (CNV-seq). Suspected positive women pregnant with male fetuses were informed and provided with prenatal genetic counseling. Results: Nineteen maternal deletions in Xp22.31 covering STS were detected by NIPS, which were all confirmed, ranging in size from 0.61 to 1.77 Mb. Among them, eleven women with deletions in male fetuses accepted prenatal diagnoses, and finally nine cases of XLI were diagnosed. The nine XLI males had differing degrees of skin abnormalities, and of them, some male members of ten families had symptoms associated with XLI. Conclusion: NIPS has the potential to detect clinically significant maternal X chromosomal CNVs causing XLI, which can guide the prenatal diagnosis of X-linked ichthyosis and reflect the family history, so as to enhance pregnancy management as well as children and family members' health management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveTo determine the effects of alanine transaminase (ALT) levels on the screening failure rates or “no calls” due to low fetal fraction (FF) to obtain a result in non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS).MethodsNIPS by sequencing and liver enzyme measurements were performed in 7,910 pregnancies at 12–26 weeks of gestation. Univariate and multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the significant predictors of screening failure rates among maternal characteristics and relevant laboratory parameters.ResultsOf the 7,910 pregnancies that met the inclusion criteria, 134 (1.69%) had “no calls.” Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that increased body mass index, ALT, prealbumin, albumin levels, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) conception rates were independently associated with screening failures. The test failure rate was higher (4.34 vs. 1.41%; P < 0.001) in IVF pregnancies relative to those with spontaneous conceptions. Meanwhile, the screening failure rates increased with increasing ALT levels from 1.05% at ≤10 U/L to 3.73% at >40 U/L. In particular, IVF pregnancies with an ALT level of >40 U/L had a higher test failure rate (9.52%). Compared with that for an ALT level of ≤10 U/L, the adjusted odds ratio of “no calls” for ALT levels of 10–20, 21–40, and >40 U/L was 1.204 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.709–2.045], 1.529 (95% CI, 0.865–2.702), and 2.764 (95% CI, 1.500–5.093) (Ptrend < 0.001), respectively.ConclusionsIncreased ALT and IVF conceptions were associated with a higher screening failure rates in NIPS. Therefore, a feasible strategy to adjust these factors to reduce the probability of “no calls” due to low FF would be of great clinical significance.

Abstract Background Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma is a high accurate test for prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Although it has been reported to be cost effective as a contingent test, evidence about its budget impact is lacking. Objective To evaluate, using computer simulations, the budget impact of implementing NIPT as a contingent test in the Quebec Program of screening for Trisomy 21. Methods A semi-Markov analytic model built to simulate the budget impact of implementing NIPT into the current Quebec Trisomy 21 public Prenatal Screening, Serum Integrated prenatal screening (SIPS). Comparisons were made for a virtual population similar to that of expected Quebec pregnant women in 2015 in terms of size and age. Data input parameters were retrieved from a thorough literature search and in government databases, especially data from Quebec Program of screening for Trisomy 21. The 2015–2016 fiscal year budget impact was estimated from the Quebec healthcare system perspective and was expressed as the difference in the overall costs between the two alternatives (SIPS minus SPS + NIPT). Results Our study found that, at a baseline cost for NIPT of CAD$ 795, NIPT as a second-tier test offered to high-risk women identified by current screening program (SIPS + NIPT) may be affordable for Quebec health care system. Compared to the current screening program, it would be implemented at a neutral cost, considering a modest annual savings of $ 80,432 (95% CI $ 79, $ 874–$ 81,462). Results were sensitive to the NIPT costs and the uptake-rate of invasive diagnostic tests. Conclusion Introducing NIPT as a contingent test in the Quebec Trisomy 21 screening program is an affordable strategy compared to the current practice. Further research is needed to confirm if our results can be reproduced in other healthcare jurisdictions.

Introduction: The presence of an unbalanced familial translocation can be reliably assessed in the cytotrophoblast of chorionic villi. However, carriers of a balanced translocation often decline invasive testing. This study aimed to investigate whether an unbalanced translocation can also be diagnosed in cell free DNA by whole‐genome non‐invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). Material and methods: Pregnant women carrying a fetus with an unbalanced familial translocation, for whom NIPS as well as microarray data were available, were included in this retrospective assessment. NIPS was performed in the course of the TRIDENT study. Results: In 12 cases, both NIPS and microarray data were available. In 10 of 12 cases the unbalanced translocation was correctly identified by NIPS without prior knowledge on parental translocation. One was missed because the fetal fraction was too low. One was missed because of technical restrictions in calling 16p gains. Conclusions: This study supports the hypothesis that routine NIPS may be used for prenatal diagnosis of unbalanced inheritance of familial translocations, especially with prior knowledge of the translocation allowing focused examination of the involved chromosomal regions. Our study showed that routine shallow sequencing designed for aneuploidy detection in cell free DNA may be sufficient for higher resolution NIPS, if specialized copy number software is used and if sufficient fetal fraction is present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To evaluate the effect of repeating test failures using an automated, non-sequencing based non-invasive prenatal testing test on a general-risk population in Finland.Material and Methods: A total of 545 samples from women who represent the average-risk population in Oulu, Finland were analyzed with Vanadis® non-invasive prenatal testing. Repeat testing of test failures was performed using a second sample. Results before and after repeat testing were compared with the reference outcome, as determined by clinical examination of neonates.Results: There were eight test failures after first-pass analysis, representing 1.5% of samples (95% CI 0.6%-2.9%). Seven out of eight failures could be resolved by analysis of a second sample, thereby reducing the test failure rate from 1.5% to 0.2% (95% CI 0.0%-1.0%).Conclusions: Repeating test failures with a second plasma sample could significantly reduce the effective failure rate, thereby providing a way to effectively minimize test failures and further improving clinical utility and test performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Our aim was to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to conduct genetic counseling and choose further prenatal diagnosis methods for pregnant women who failed non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on pregnant women who had failed NIPS tests. Results: Among the 123,291 samples, 394 pregnant women did not obtain valid results due to test failures. A total of 378 pregnant women were available for follow-up, while 16 patients were lost to follow-up. Of these 378, 135 pregnant women chose further prenatal diagnosis through amniocentesis, and one case of dysplasia was recalled for postpartum chromosome testing. The incidence rate of congenital chromosomal abnormalities in those who failed the NIPS was 3.97% (15/378), which was higher than that of the chromosomal abnormalities in the common population (1.8%). Among the pregnant women who received prenatal diagnosis, the positive rates of chromosomal abnormalities in the chromosomal microarray analysis/copy number variation sequencing (CMA/CNV-seq) group and in the karyotyping group were 15.28 and 4.76%, respectively. Conclusion: Prenatal diagnosis should be strongly recommended in posttest genetic counseling for pregnant women with NIPS failures. Further, high-resolution detection methods should be recommended for additional prenatal diagnoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe our clinical experience across the entire range of fetal-fraction (FF) measurements of a non-invasive prenatal screen (NIPS) that uses whole- genome sequencing (WGS).Methods: We analyzed retrospectively results from 58 105 singleton pregnancies that underwent NIPS on a customized WGS platform during an 8-month period and assessed clinical test performance for trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13. Pregnancy outcomes were sought for all screen-positive patients and for 18% of screen-negative patients. As differences in outcome-collection response rates could artificially impact test-performance calculations, we computed inferred sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values adjusted for ascertainment bias.Results: The screening test yielded a result for 99.9% (n = 58 048) of patients, meaning that approximately 1 in 1000 patients received a test failure (i.e. test failure rate = 0.1%). Of pregnancies with a test result, 572 (1%) screened positive for one of the common aneuploidies (362 for trisomy 21, 142 for trisomy 18 and 68 for trisomy 13). Informative outcomes were received for 237 (41.4%) patients with a screen-positive result and 3258 (5.7%) of those with a screen-negative result. In the full cohort, inferred sensitivities for trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 were 99.7%, 96.8% and 94.3%, respectively, and PPVs were 93.1%, 85.2% and 48.4%, respectively. If a FF threshold of 4% had been employed to guard against false negatives, calculated sensitivities for the three aneuploidies would not have changed significantly, yet, importantly, the overall test-failure rate would have increased to 6.6% (n = 3829), impacting 1 in 15 women.Conclusions: Our clinical experience demonstrates that a customized WGS-based NIPS without a FF threshold achieves high accuracy while maintaining a low test-failure rate of 0.1%. As such, alternative strategies to ensure high accuracy of detection of common aneuploidies in samples with low FF (such as redraw after test failure, redrawing at a later gestational age, risk scoring based on FF) are not necessary for this screening approach. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity. We gathered follow-up information for pregnancies in women with test-positive NIPS results from 2014–2017 with quarterly assessments of positive predictive values (PPVs). A non-inferiority analysis with a minimum requirement of 70%/80% of expected performance for trisomy 21 and 18 was used to ensure testing met expectations. PPVs were evaluated in the context of changes in the population receiving testing. For all quarters, PPVs for trisomies 21 and 18 exceeded the requirement of > 70% of the reference PPV. Overall observed PPVs for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and monosomy X were similar for women aged <35 (90.9%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 88.6–92.7%) compared to women with advanced maternal age (94.5%, 95% CI 93.1–95.6%). Despite significant declines in test-positive rates from 1.18% to 0.62% for trisomy 21, and from 0.75% to 0.48% for trisomies 18, 13 and monosomy X combined, PPVs remained stable through the four-year interval. We conclude that quarterly evaluation of PPV provides an overview of past testing and helps demonstrate long-term consistency in test performance, even in the setting of increasing use by women with lower a priori risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]