Search

The development of standards for the field of regenerative medicine has been noted as a high priority by several road-mapping activities. Additionally, the U.S. Congress recognizes the importance of standards in the 21st Century Cure Act. Standards will help to accelerate and streamline cell and gene therapy product development, ensure the quality and consistency of processes and products, and facilitate their regulatory approval. Although there is general agreement for the need of additional standards for regenerative medicine products, a shared understanding of standards is required for real progress toward the development of standards to advance regenerative medicine. Here, we describe the roles of standards in regenerative medicine as well as the process for standards development and the interactions of different entities in the standards development process. Highlighted are recent coordinated efforts between the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National Institute of Standards and Technology to facilitate standards development and foster science that underpins standards development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background aims. Multipotent stromal cells, also called mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), are potentially valuable as a cellular therapy because of their differentiation and immunosuppressive properties. As the result of extensive heterogeneity of MSCs, quantitative approaches to measure differentiation capacity between donors and passages on a per-cell basis are needed. Methods. Human bone marrow-derived MSCs were expanded to passages P3, P5 and P7 from eight different donors and were analyzed for colony-forming unit capacity (CFU), cell size, surface marker expression and forward/side-scatter analysis by flow cytometry. Adipogenic differentiation potential was quantified with the use of automated microscopy. Percentage of adipogenesis was determined by quantifying nuclei and Nile red-positive adipocytes after automated image acquisition. Results. MSCs varied in expansion capacity and increased in average cell diameter with passage. CFU capacity decreased with passage and varied among cell lines within the same passage. The number of adipogenic precursors varied between cell lines, ranging from 0.5% to 13.6% differentiation at P3. Adipogenic capacity decreased significantly with increasing passage. MSC cell surface marker analysis revealed no changes caused by passaging or donor differences. Conclusions. We measured adipogenic differentiation on a per-cell basis with high precision and accuracy with the use of automated fluorescence microscopy. We correlated these findings with other quantitative bioassays to better understand the role of donor variability and passaging on CFU, cell size and adipogenic differentiation capacity in vitro. These quantitative approaches provide valuable tools to measure MSC quality and measure functional biological differences between donors and cell passages that are not revealed by conventional MSC cell surface marker analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heterogeneity in cell function has presented a significant hurdle to the successful clinical translation of many cellular therapies. Current techniques for assessing cell quality and the effects of microenvironmental cues and manufacturing processes on cell behavior often inadequately address heterogeneity due to issues such as population versus single-cell measurements and the therapeutic relevance and throughput/robustness of the assay. Due to the well-established relationship between morphology and cellular function, morphological profiling has become increasingly utilized to better understand functional heterogeneity and its impact on therapeutic development. In this review, we introduce an emerging field we term functionally-relevant morphological profiling with great potential to improve our understanding of cellular heterogeneity through discovering novel quality attributes, optimizing manufacturing, and screening drugs/biomaterials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multipotent stromal cells (MSCs) are known for their distinctive ability to differentiate into different cell lineages, such as adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteocytes. They can be isolated from numerous tissue sources, including bone marrow, adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and others. Because of their differentiation potential and secretion of growth factors, MSCs are believed to have an inherent quality of regeneration and immune suppression. Cellular expansion is necessary to obtain sufficient numbers for use; however, MSCs exhibit a reduced capacity for proliferation and differentiation after several rounds of passaging. In this study, gene markers of MSC proliferation were identified and evaluated for their ability to predict proliferative quality. Microarray data of human bone marrow-derived MSCs were correlated with two proliferation assays. A collection of 24 genes were observed to significantly correlate with both proliferation assays (| r| >0.70) for eight MSC lines at multiple passages. These 24 identified genes were then confirmed using an additional set of MSCs from eight new donors using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The proliferative potential of the second set of MSCs was measured for each donor/passage for confluency fraction, fraction of EdU+ cells, and population doubling time. The second set of MSCs exhibited a greater proliferative potential at passage 4 in comparison to passage 8, which was distinguishable by 15 genes; however, only seven of the genes ( BIRC5, CCNA2, CDC20, CDK1, PBK, PLK1, and SPC25) demonstrated significant correlation with MSC proliferation regardless of passage. Our analyses revealed that correlation between gene expression and proliferation was consistently reduced with the inclusion of non-MSC cell lines; therefore, this set of seven genes may be more strongly associated with MSC proliferative quality. Our results pave the way to determine the quality of an MSC population for a particular cellular therapy in lieu of an extended in vitro or in vivo assay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study which investigated the chromosomal stability of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) during cell culture and therapy.