Search

In trial 1, 30 midlactation (213 d in milk) Holstein cows were randomly assigned to a control or enzyme treatment in a two-period crossover design and were fed a total mixed ration based on alfalfa hay and silage. Cows on the enzyme treatment received an enzyme solution containing cellulases and xylanases, which was sprayed on the forage component of the ration at a rate of 1.65 ml/kg of forage dry matter (DM) between 8 and 24 h prior to feeding. Cows consuming the forage treated with enzyme produced more milk (27.2 vs. 25.9 kg/d) and digested more DM per day than did cows fed the control forage. In trial 2, 40 early lactation Holstein cows were assigned to one of four treatments for 16 wk. Following a 2-wk covariate period, cows were assigned to 1) no enzyme treatment, 2) a low (1.25 ml/kg of forage DM) enzyme treatment, 3) a medium (2.5 ml/kg of forage DM) enzyme treatment, or 4) a high (5.0 ml/kg of forage DM) enzyme treatment. Enzymes were a 2:1 combination of cellulase and xylanase diluted in water and sprayed on a combination of alfalfa hay and silage and whole cottonseed immediately before mixing with a concentrate based on barley. Dry matter intakes were similar for cows on treatments 2, 3, and 4 and were greater than those for cows on treatment 1. Production of milk, 3.5% fat-corrected milk, and energy-corrected milk was greater for cows on treatment 3 than for cows on treatment 1. Fibrolytic enzymes applied to the forage portion of the rations prior to feeding improved lactational performance of early and midlactation cows.

A study was conducted to examine the method of delivery of a solution containing cellulases and xylanases on the digestion of a forage-based diet. Five ruminally cannulated beef steers (536 kg BW) were randomly assigned to a control (CON) or one of four enzyme treatments in a 5 x 5 Latin square experiment. Steers were fed a 70:30 (DM basis) grass hay:barley diet. Enzyme-treated rations contained a solution of fibrolytic enzymes at the rate of 1.65 mL/kg of forage DM. Enzyme application treatments were 1) enzyme to forage 24 h before feeding (F-24), 2) enzyme to forage 0 h before feeding (F-0), 3) enzyme to barley 0 h before feeding (B-0), and 4) enzyme infused ruminally 2 h after feeding (RI). Dry matter and NDF intakes were not different (P > .10) across treatments. Ruminal pH was lower and total VFA concentration at 16 h after-feeding was greater (P < .10) for steers fed enzyme treatments compared with CON. Rate of NDF disappearance was greater (P < .05) for enzyme-treated than for untreated grass substrate. Ruminal infusion of enzymes compared with F-24 and F-0 produced lower disappearance of DM at 8 and 32 h (P < .10), NDF at 32 h (P < .10), and DM and NDF at 96 h (P < .05). Rate of DM disappearance of enzyme-treated grass hay was greater (P < .10) for steers fed B-0 than for those fed F-24 and F-0 and for CON than for F-24 and F-0. Total tract digestibility of DM, NDF, and ADF was greater (P < .10) for F-24 and F-0 than for CON. Forage transit time was shorter (P < .10) for B-0 than for F-24 and F-0; however, all other contrasts for particulate passage did not differ (P > .10). Results from this study indicate that direct application of enzymes to forages is capable of improving forage digestion.

In situ and in vitro studies with a 3 x 2 x 5 factorial arrangement of treatments with an added untreated control evaluated three enzyme preparations, two levels of enzyme, and five moisture conditions of grass forage. Enzyme preparations predominantly contained cellulase and xylanase and will be designated as enzyme 1 (E1), enzyme 2 (E2), and a 50:50 combination of E1 and E2 (E1E2). The five moisture conditions included fresh, wilted, dried and rehydrated to fresh, dried and rehydrated to wilt, and dried grass. Addition of the high level of E1E2 to dried grass improved (P < .05) in vitro DM (43.5 vs 38.7%) and NDF (31.1 vs 26.0%) disappearance (48 h incubation) compared with the control treatment. Also, IVDMD was greater (P < .05) for the low level of E1 applied to wilted grass compared with the control. No other enzyme application improved in situ or in vitro disappearance of substrate over the control. In vivo responses of enzyme treatments found most likely to be effective from degradability studies were measured using four ruminally cannulated steers in a 4 x 4 Latin square experiment. Treatments examined were E1 applied to fresh forage, then dried; E1 applied to wilted forage, then dried; E1E2 applied to dry forage immediately before feeding (E-dry), and untreated forage (control). All forage treatments were harvested as dry hay. Total diet and hay DM intakes were greater (P < .05) for the E-dry than for the control diet. Rate of in situ NDF disappearance and total tract DM and NDF digestibility were greater (P < .05) for the E-dry than for the other treatments. Ruminal fluid ammonia N concentration, total VFA concentration, and pH were not altered (P > .10) by dietary treatment. Ruminal particulate passage rate was greater (P < .05) and ruminal retention time was shorter (P < .05) for the E-dry than for the control treatment. Data from this study suggest that addition of fibrolytic enzymes to grass hay before feeding has the potential to enhance intake and digestion.