Search

Repeated administration of psychostimulant drugs, such as amphetamine, induces an enhanced behavioral response to subsequent drug challenge. This behavioral sensitization is proposed to model the increased drug craving observed in human psychostimulant abusers. Current thinking is that the ventral tegmental area, but not the nucleus accumbens, plays a critical role in the development of behavioral sensitization. Here, we report that the concomitant blockade of glutamatergic and nicotinic ionotropic receptors in the core of the nucleus accumbens blocks the development of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine and further abolishes the increase in extracellular dopamine release induced by amphetamine in the nucleus accumbens. These findings demonstrate that the development of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine depends, in addition to the well-known role of the ventral tegmental area, on glutamatergic and nicotinic-dependent mechanisms in the core of the nucleus accumbens and further indicate that the dopaminergic mesolimbic pathway must be viewed as a single coordinated system of critical importance in the development of behavioral sensitization to psychostimulant drugs., (© 2011 The Authors, Addiction Biology © 2011 Society for the Study of Addiction.)

The role of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) in the expression of behavioural locomotor sensitization to amphetamine (Amph) has been poorly studied. In the present study, we investigated how lidocaine infused in the mPFC or BLA modulated motor responses to acute and repeated (sensitization) Amph administration. We showed that reversible blockade of mPFC or BLA by lidocaine increased both locomotor and rearing responses to acute Amph, but blocked the expression of behavioural sensitization to Amph. These findings indicate that under free-lidocaine conditions repeated administration of Amph would produce a shift of mPFC and BLA motor function from an inhibitory to a facilitatory role in response to Amph. We propose that this phenomenon may be of major critical importance in the development of drug dependence.

Although the dorsal hippocampus (DH) and the ventral hippocampus (VH) densely innervate the nucleus accumbens, which mediates the expression of behavioural sensitization, the respective and specific contribution of DH and VH in the expression of behavioural sensitization to amphetamine has not been investigated. In the present study, we investigated how lidocaine infused in DH or VH modulated behavioural locomotor sensitization induced by repeated administration of systemic amphetamine. Rats, well habituated to their environmental conditions and experimental protocol, were given repeated administration of systemic amphetamine. Once behavioural sensitization was developed, rats were challenged with amphetamine and infused with saline (controls) or lidocaine into DH or VH. We found that reversible inhibition by lidocaine of DH, but not VH, blocks the expression of behavioural sensitization to amphetamine. Control animals injected with saline solution do express behavioural sensitization. Our results bring new insights on the role of the hippocampus complex in the expression of behavioural sensitization, indicating that, in individuals well habituated to the drug-associated context, DH but not VH would play a key role. The results provide experimental evidence for clinical studies in human addicts that have demonstrated that exposure to environmental stimuli associated with drug-taking behaviour elicits craving and can promote relapse, and further suggest that in drug abusers, once addiction has occurred, the contextual and spatial conditions that are associated with drug consumption may play a critical role in the maintenance of drug abuse.

Background: Amphetamine administration induces stimulation-independent dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) through reverse dopamine transport, a critical neurochemical event involved in its psychostimulant action, and furthermore decreases stimulation-dependent vesicular dopamine release. These effects may involve possible indirect glutamatergic mechanisms., Methods: We investigated the effects of nitrous oxide and xenon, which possess antagonistic action at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, on brain slices ex vivo on amphetamine-induced changes in carrier-mediated and KCl-evoked dopamine release in the NAcc, and in vivo on amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization., Results: Like the low-affinity NMDA receptor antagonist memantine, but not the prototypical compound MK-801, nitrous oxide and xenon at appropriate concentrations blocked both the increase in carrier-mediated dopamine release and locomotor sensitization produced by amphetamine., Conclusions: In contrast to what has generally been found using prototypical NMDA receptor antagonists, these data regarding the effect of memantine, nitrous oxide, and xenon support the hypothesis that activation of certain NMDA receptors (possibly those containing the NR1a/NR2D subunit) in the NAcc is involved in the amphetamine-induced increase in carrier-mediated dopamine release and the development of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Nitrous oxide, xenon, and memantine may be of therapeutic interest for treating drug dependence.

Previous investigations have shown that mGlu receptors would be involved in the amphetamine-induced motor response. However, data are somewhat controversial across studies where methodological protocols vary. The aim of the present study was to determine the involvement of mGlu receptors in the NAcc in the locomotor-activating properties of amphetamine in rats well habituated to their experimental environment, a condition known to modulate the motor response to amphetamine. Focal infusion of the group I mGlu receptor antagonist S-4-CPG, which has no effect on basal motor activity, virtually suppressed the locomotor response to amphetamine, while infusion of the group II mGlu receptor antagonist LY 341495 or the group III mGlu receptor agonist AP4, at the minimal dose that produces locomotor activation, reduced it by approximately a half. These effects were blocked by the group I mGlu receptor agonist DHPG, the group II mGlu receptor agonist APDC, and the group III mGlu receptor antagonist MPPG, respectively. These data confirm that mGlu receptors in the NAcc contribute to the psychostimulant motor effect of amphetamine. Results are discussed from the view of recent neuropharmacological studies that have defined the effects of these mGlu receptor ligands on basal motor activity and DA receptor agonists-induced locomotor responses in rats exposed to similar experimental procedures (Eur J Neuroscience 13 (2001) 2157; Neuropharmacology 41 (2001) 454; Eur J Neuroscience 13 (2001) 869). It is suggested that the contribution of mGlu receptors to the amphetamine-induced motor response may result mainly from their functional, either direct or indirect, interactions with D1-like receptors in the NAcc.

Infusion in the nucleus accumbens of the glutamate uptake inhibitor L-trans-PDC prevented the amphetamine-induced locomotor response. Since L-trans-PDC has been shown to block the amphetamine-induced increase in glutamate but not in DA release, our result indicates that the glutamate transporter is an obligatory target for the activating properties of amphetamine.