Search

The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude of the morbidity following radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer. We performed a retrospective survey of all women who had undergone a radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy between the months of July 1995 and December 1996 inclusive at either the Royal Marsden or St George's Hospital (n =38), using a detailed questionnaire on bladder, ano-rectal and sexual function, both before and after treatment. Sixteen women (44.4%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. The mean interval between surgery and inquiry was 16.4% months (range 8-25 months). The mean age at the time of surgery was 40.5 years. Thirty-six out of 38 women contacted responded (94.7%). Overall 33 women (91.7%) reported new bladder, ano-rectal or sexual symptoms. Complaints of urinary incontinence, particularly of urge incontinence, and of voiding difficulties increased significantly after surgery (P <0.05). However, only 5.3% of women had sought treatment. Tenesmus increased significantly (P <0.05), while increases in diarrhoea and faecal incontinence were not statistically significant (P =0.051). Although 12.9% of women stated an improvement in their sex lives, 54.8% thought that their sex life was worse after treatment, and 12.9% of women had ceased sexual activity altogether. Of women of childbearing age 53.8% felt adversely affected by their loss of fertility. Bladder, ano-rectal and sexual symptoms are very common following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer, with adverse effect on quality of life, and persist into the second year after treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a case study of a 75-year-old woman who was admitted to the Accident and Emergency Department in Great Britain due to abdominal distension and pain caused by advanced ovarian carcinoma. Physicians have performed hemostatic and Floseal sealants to assess gynecological malignancy. It found that basic fibroblastic growth factor (bFGF), angiogenin (ANG) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can lead an increase tissue vascularity to the disease.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has many benefits, in the form of reduced postoperative morbidity, improved recovery and reduced inpatient stay. It is imperative, however, when new techniques are adopted, in the context of treating oncology patients, that the oncological efficacy and safety are established rigorously rather than assumed based on first principles. Here we have attempted to provide a comprehensive review of all the contentious and topical themes surrounding the use of MIS in the treatment of endometrial and cervix cancer following a thorough review of the literature. On the topic of endometrial cancer, we cover the role of laparoscopy in both early and advanced disease, together with the role and unique benefits of robotic surgery. The surgical challenge of patients with a raised body mass index and the frail and elderly are discussed and finally the role of sentinel lymph node assessment. For cervical cancer, the role of MIS for staging and primary treatment is covered, together with the interesting and highly specialist topics of fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian transposition and the live birth rate associated with this. We end with a discussion on the evidence surrounding the role of adjuvant hysterectomy following radical chemoradiation and pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer. MIS is the standard of care for endometrial cancer. The future of MIS for cervix cancer, however, remains uncertain. Current recommendations, based on the available evidence, are that the open approach should be considered the gold standard for the surgical management of early cervical cancer and that MIS should only be adopted in the context of research. Careful counselling of patients on the current evidence, discussing in detail the risks and benefits to enable them to make an informed choice, remains paramount. • Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly used in gynaecological oncology. • Obesity is prevalent in endometrial cancer and is associated with significant surgical morbidity. • Minimally invasive surgery is associated with reduced postoperative complications. • Robotic surgery supports increased rates of minimally invasive surgery. • The future of minimally invasive surgery for cervix remains uncertain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]