Jean Marie Ruysschaert, Dick Hoekstra, Isabelle Martin, and Alain Bienvenüe, Eve-Isabelle Pécheur, Nanotechnology and Biophysics in Medicine (NANOBIOMED), Deleage, Gilbert, Institut de biologie et chimie des protéines [Lyon] (IBCP), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), and Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
International audience; We recently demonstrated that an amphipathic net-negatively charged peptide consisting of 11 amino acids (WAE 11) strongly promotes fusion of large unilamellar liposomes (LUV) when anchored to a liposomal membrane [Pecheur, E. I., Hoekstra, D., Sainte-Marie, J., Maurin, L., Bienvenue, A., and Philippot, J. R. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 3773-3781]. To elucidate a potential relationship between peptide structure and its fusogenic properties and to test the hypothesis that specific structural motifs are a prerequisite for WAE-induced fusion, three 11-mer WAE-peptide analogues (WAK, WAEPro, and WAS) were synthesized and investigated for their structure and fusion activity. Structural analysis of the synthetic peptides by infrared attenuated total reflection spectroscopy reveals a distinct propensity of each peptide toward a helical structure after their anchorage to a liposomal surface, emphasizing the importance of anchorage on conveying a secondary structure, thereby conferring fusogenicity to these peptides. However, whereas WAE and WAK peptides displayed an essentially nonleaky fusion process, WAS- and WAEPro-induced fusion was accompanied by substantial leakage. It appears that peptide helicity as such is not a sufficient condition to convey optimal fusion properties to these 11-mer peptides. Studies of changes in the intrinsic Trp fluorescence and iodide quenching experiments were carried out and revealed the absence of migration of the Trp residue of WAS and WAEPro to a hydrophobic environment, upon their interaction with the target membranes. These results do not support the penetration of both peptides as their mode of membrane interaction and destabilization but rather suggest their folding along the vesicle surface, posing them as surface-seeking helixes. This is in striking contrast to the behavior observed for WAE and WAK, for which at least partial penetration of the Trp residue was demonstrated. These results indicate that subtle differences in the primary sequence of a fusogenic peptide could induce dramatic changes in the way the peptide interacts with a bilayer, culminating in equally drastic changes in their functional properties. The data also reveal a certain degree of sequence specificity in WAE-induced fusion.We recently demonstrated that an amphipathic net-negatively charged peptide consisting of 11 amino acids (WAE 11) strongly promotes fusion of large unilamellar liposomes (LUV) when anchored to a liposomal membrane [Pecheur, E. I., Hoekstra, D., Sainte-Marie, J., Maurin, L., Bienvenue, A., and Philippot, J. R. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 3773-3781]. To elucidate a potential relationship between peptide structure and its fusogenic properties and to test the hypothesis that specific structural motifs are a prerequisite for WAE-induced fusion, three 11-mer WAE-peptide analogues (WAK, WAEPro, and WAS) were synthesized and investigated for their structure and fusion activity. Structural analysis of the synthetic peptides by infrared attenuated total reflection spectroscopy reveals a distinct propensity of each peptide toward a helical structure after their anchorage to a liposomal surface, emphasizing the importance of anchorage on conveying a secondary structure, thereby conferring fusogenicity to these peptides. However, whereas WAE and WAK peptides displayed an essentially nonleaky fusion process, WAS- and WAEPro-induced fusion was accompanied by substantial leakage. It appears that peptide helicity as such is not a sufficient condition to convey optimal fusion properties to these 11-mer peptides. Studies of changes in the intrinsic Trp fluorescence and iodide quenching experiments were carried out and revealed the absence of migration of the Trp residue of WAS and WAEPro to a hydrophobic environment, upon their interaction with the target membranes. These results do not support the penetration of both peptides as their mode of membrane interaction and destabilization but rather suggest their folding along the vesicle surface, posing them as surface-seeking helixes. This is in striking contrast to the behavior observed for WAE and WAK, for which at least partial penetration of the Trp residue was demonstrated. These results indicate that subtle differences in the primary sequence of a fusogenic peptide could induce dramatic changes in the way the peptide interacts with a bilayer, culminating in equally drastic changes in their functional properties. The data also reveal a certain degree of sequence specificity in WAE-induced fusion.