1. In vitro assessment of PEEK and titanium implant abutments: Screw loosening and microleakage evaluations under dynamic mechanical testing
- Author
-
Miguel Roig Cayón, Josep Cabratosa-Termes, Jordi Ortega-Martínez, Jordi Cano-Batalla, Miquel Punset, Monica Ortiz-Hernandez, Luis Delgado, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Ciència i Enginyeria de Materials, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. BBT - Biomaterials, Biomecànica i Enginyeria de Teixits, and Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
- Subjects
Dental Stress Analysis ,Materials science ,Dental materials ,Polymers ,Dental implant ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Bone Screws ,Materials dentals ,Abutment ,Dentistry ,chemistry.chemical_element ,Dental Abutments ,Esthetics, Dental ,Benzophenones ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,PEEK ,Materials Testing ,Stereo microscope ,medicine ,Peek ,Humans ,Dental Restoration Failure ,Dental Implants ,Titanium ,business.industry ,Screw loosening ,Titanium alloy ,Dental Implant-Abutment Design ,030206 dentistry ,Enginyeria biomèdica::Biomaterials::Materials dentals [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC] ,Dynamic mechanical testing ,chemistry ,Microleakage ,Mechanical Tests ,ISO 14801 ,Zirconium ,Implant ,Oral Surgery ,business - Abstract
Statement of problem. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has been advocated to replace metal components in dentistry. Although PEEK is a high-performance polymer with a white color, adequate biological response, and resistance to fracture, data to support PEEK as an alternative material for implant abutments are lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the mechanical and functional properties of PEEK implant abutments as a nonmetallic alternative to titanium abutments, which presents esthetic limitations and greater difficulty to customize clinically. Material and methods. Implant abutments manufactured by using PEEK (n=24) or titanium grade 5 (n=24) were attached to MIS Implants type M4 3.75×16 mm with an internal screw tightened to 25 Ncm. Screw loosening and microleakage was assessed by submersion in a 2% methylene blue solution for 48 hours at 37 C. Both groups were compared with and without applying dynamic loading; fatigue testing was performed following the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14801:2016 standard. All specimens were observed under a stereomicroscope at ×8 magnification. Statistically significant differences among the PEEK and titanium implant abutments were tested with 2-factor ANOVA and the chi-square analysis for nonpaired and paired data, respectively (a=.05). Results. The implant abutments made of titanium were better in all mechanical tests. The torque loss of titanium abutments was approximately 10%, while PEEK showed a significantly higher (P
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF