1. Validity of the doubly labeled water method for estimating CO2 production in mice under different nutritional conditions
- Author
-
Harro A. J. Meijer, Gertjan van Dijk, Stefano Guidotti, Isotope Research, and Van Dijk lab
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,diet-induced obesity ,HIGH-FAT DIET ,BODY-WATER ,Physiology ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Body water ,Energy metabolism ,RAT-LIVER ,Doubly labeled water ,Carbon dioxide production ,Animal science ,Physiology (medical) ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,O-18 ,CARBON-DIOXIDE PRODUCTION ,IN-VIVO ,validation ,body composition ,metabolic rate ,Chemistry ,ENERGY-EXPENDITURE ,High fat diet ,HUMANS ,doubly labeled water ,Endocrinology ,Biochemistry ,Rat liver ,Metabolic rate ,Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ,ISOTOPE-DILUTION - Abstract
The doubly labeled water (DLW) technique is used to assess metabolic rate (MR) in free-living conditions. We investigated whether differences in the nutritional and body adiposity status affect validity of the assessment of CO2production (rCO2) by the DLW technique. To serve this purpose, we compared calculated rCO2by the DLW method to actual CO2production concomitantly measured in an indirect calorimetry setup over a 3-day period in mice fed with a low-fat (LF) diet or an obesogenic high-fat/high-sucrose (HF) diet. To uncover a potential effect of body composition on DLW accuracy, the HF-fed group was further subdivided in a diet-induced obesity-prone (DIO) and diet-induced obesity-resistant (DR) group. Furthermore, we assessed the influence of different sampling protocols, duration, and methodology of calculation. An excellent match was found between rCO2assessed by the two methods in the LF-fed mice (least discrepancy −0.5 ± 1.1%). In contrast, there was a consistent overestimation of rCO2by the DLW technique in the HF-fed animals compared with actual CO2production independent from body mass gain (least discrepancy DR +15.9 ± 2.2%, DIO +18.5 ± 3.2%). The least discrepancies were found when two-pool model equations and the intercept method were used to calculate the body water pool. Furthermore, the HF group presented different equilibration kinetics of2H and18O and a lower dilution space ratio between the two. We recommend particular caution when using the DLW method for MR assessment in HF-fed animals and potentially humans because of the overestimation of rCO2.
- Published
- 2013