Search

Background: FN is a dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy which can affect patient (pt) outcomes. EORTC guidelines recommend G-CSF primary prophylaxis when the overall FN risk assessment is ≥20%. We evaluated risk assessment and guideline adherence (prophylaxis in high-risk pts) in clinical practice among breast cancer patients. Methods: Eligible pts were enrolled consecutively at centres selected based on experience and geographical spread. Key inclusion criteria were diagnosis of solid tumour or lymphoma, physician-assessed overall FN risk ≥10% (chemotherapy risk plus individual risk factors per EORTC guidelines), and planned primary (PPP) or secondary (PSP) prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim. Pegfilgrastim administered >3 days after chemotherapy completion was classified as therapeutic use. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of pts with an investigator-assessed overall FN risk of >20% or 10–20% receiving PPP or PSP. Secondary objectives included evaluating FN incidence and chemotherapy dose reductions/delays. Data from breast cancer patients only are reported, and prophylaxis in high-risk patients was determined to evaluate guideline adherence. Results: 1003 pts were enrolled from Nov 2007 to Sept 2010. Mean (±SD) age was 54.4 (±11.2) years, almost all pts (99%) were female. Treatment intent was deemed curative by the investigator in 91% of pts. The investigator-assessed FN risk was >20% in 505 (50%) pts and 10–20% in 414 (41%) pts. Despite eligibility criteria, 84 (8%) pts were assessed by investigators as Conclusion: Adherence to G-CSF guidelines, and reasons for differences between planned and administered prophylaxis warrants further investigation. Comparison of outcomes between prophylaxis groups should be interpreted with caution; however, FN incidence remained low with pegfilgrastim PP among breast cancer pts in German clinical practice. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-02.

Background: Both progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR) are significantly improved when bevacizumab (Bev) is combined with first-line chemotherapy for locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC), as demonstrated in three randomized, phase III trials (E2100, AVADO, RIBBON-1). The benefit derived from Bev appears to be similar in triple-negative (TN) and non-TN LR/mBC according to subanalyses of the randomized trials. We conducted a subpopulation analysis of TN patients treated with first-line Bev-paclitaxel (Pac) in a large German observational study in the context of routine oncology practice. Methods: Patients with HER2-negative LR/mBC received first-line Bev-Pac according to the European label at the time of study design. Safety and efficacy data were collected for up to 1 year (or until progression, death, or Bev discontinuation if earlier). The endpoints were safety and efficacy (PFS and RR). We conducted an exploratory analysis of the subset of patients with TN disease. Results: Of the 567 patients for whom data are currently available, 115 (20%) had TN disease. Baseline characteristics and efficacy are summarized below. Overall survival data are immature and follow-up is continuing. Conclusions: In this ongoing study, first-line Bev-Pac demonstrated a 51% RR and median PFS of 7.7 months in patients with TN LR/mBC. These data are consistent with findings from retrospective analyses of randomized phase III trials and a subpopulation analysis of the ATHENA study. Prospective trials evaluating Bev combination regimens in TN breast cancer are ongoing. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-16-12.

Background The GeparQuinto study showed that adding bevacizumab to 24 weeks of anthracycline–taxane–based neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates overall and specifically in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). No difference in pCR rate was observed for adding everolimus to paclitaxel in nonearly responding patients. Here, we present disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. Patients and methods Patients (n = 1948) with HER2-negative tumors of a median tumor size of 4 cm were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant treatment with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-T) with or without eight infusions of bevacizumab every 3 weeks before surgery. Patients without clinical response to EC ± Bevacizumab were randomized to 12 weekly cycles paclitaxel with or without everolimus 5 mg/day. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (α = 0.05, β = 0.8) 379 events had to be observed in the bevacizumab arms. Results With a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 3-year DFS was 80.8% and 3-year OS was 89.7%. Outcome was not different for patients receiving bevacizumab (HR 1.03; P = 0.784 for DFS and HR 0.974; P = 0.842 for OS) compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Patients with TNBC similarly showed no improvement in DFS (HR = 0.99; P = 0.941) and OS (HR = 1.02; P = 0.891) when treated with bevacizumab. No other predefined subgroup (HR+/HER2-; locally advanced (cT4 or cN3) or not; cT1–3 or cT4; pCR or not) showed a significant benefit. No difference in DFS (HR 0.997; P = 0.987) and OS (HR 1.11; P = 0.658) was observed for nonearly responding patients receiving paclitaxel with or without everolimus overall as well as in subgroups. Conclusions Long-term results, in opposite to the results of pCR, do not support the neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab in addition to an anthracycline–taxane-based chemotherapy or everolimus in addition to paclitaxel for nonearly responding patients. Clinical trial number NCT 00567554, www.clinicaltrials.gov .

ML18147 evaluated continued bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) progressing after the standard first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy.Evaluating outcomes according to tumor Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene (KRAS) status was an exploratory analysis. KRAS data were collected from local laboratories (using their established methods) and/or from a central laboratory (mutation-specific Scorpion amplification-refractory mutation system). No adjustment was made for multiplicity; analyses were not powered to detect statistically significant differences.Of 820 patients, 616 (75%) had unambiguous KRAS data; 316 (51%) had KRAS wild-type tumors and 300 (49%) had mutant KRAS tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months for bevacizumab plus chemotherapy and 4.5 months for chemotherapy [P0.0001; HR = 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.77] for wild-type KRAS and 5.5 and 4.1 months, respectively (P = 0.0027; HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56-0.89) for mutant KRAS. The median overall survival (OS) was 15.4 and 11.1 months, respectively (P = 0.0052; HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.90) for wild-type KRAS and 10.4 versus 10.0 months, respectively (P = 0.4969; HR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.71-1.18) for mutant KRAS. In both analyses, no treatment interaction by KRAS status was observed (PFS, P = 0.4436; OS, P = 0.1266).Bevacizumab beyond first progression represents an option for patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab plus standard first-line chemotherapy, independent of KRAS status.