Search

There are limited real‐world data on the treatment practices, outcomes, and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone in potential candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for unresectable non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of CRT in patients who underwent CRT and would satisfy the key eligibility criteria for maintenance therapy with durvalumab (eg, no progression after CRT) in real‐world settings (m‐sub) for unresectable Stage III NSCLC between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015 at 12 sites in Japan. The m‐sub comprised 214 patients with a median follow‐up of 31.6 months (range 1.9‐65.8 months). Median overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) from completing CRT were 36.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.1 months to not reached) and 9.5 months (95% CI 7.7‐11.7 months), respectively. Consolidation chemotherapy did not influence OS or PFS. Median PFS was 16.9 vs 9.1 months in patients with vs without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, with PFS rates of ~20% at 3‐4 years. Pneumonitis was the most common adverse event (according to MedDRA version 21.0J), and about half of events were grade 1. Pneumonitis mostly occurred 10‐24 weeks after starting CRT, peaking at 18‐20 weeks. Esophagitis and dermatitis generally occurred from 0 to 4 weeks, peaking at 2‐4 weeks after starting CRT. Pericarditis was rare and occurred sporadically. In conclusion, the results of the m‐sub provide real‐world insight into the outcomes of CRT, and will be useful for future evaluations of ICI maintenance therapy after CRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Amrubicin, a third-generation synthetic anthracycline agent, has favorable clinical activity and acceptable toxicity for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin for advanced NSCLC patients as a third- or fourth-line therapy. Eligible patients had recurrent or refractory advanced NSCLC after second- or third-line therapy. Patients received amrubicin, 35 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-3 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR). Secondary end points were the overall survival (OS) time, progression-free survival (PFS) time, response rate, and toxicity profile. Of the 41 patients enrolled, 26 received amrubicin as a third-line and 15 received it as a fourth-line therapy. The median number of treatment cycles was two (range, 1-9). Objective responses were complete response (n = 0), partial response (n = 4), stable disease (n = 21), progressive disease (n = 15), and not evaluable (n = 1), resulting in a DCR of 61.0% (95% confidence interval, 46.0%-75.9%). The overall response rate was 9.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.6%-18.8%). The median PFS interval was 3.0 months, median OS time was 12.6 months, and 1-year survival rate was 53.7%. Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia (68%), anemia (12%), thrombocytopenia (12%), and febrile neutropenia (17%). Nonhematological toxicities were mild and reversible. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Amrubicin showed significant clinical activity with manageable toxicities as a third- or fourth-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. This study provides relevant data for routine practice and future prospective trials evaluating third- or fourth-line treatment strategies for patients with advanced NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: Although paclitaxel with carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy has improved survival for patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal dose of paclitaxel has not been well defined in Japan. This study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin and concurrent real-time tumor-tracking thoracic radiation therapy (thoracic RTRT). Patients and methods: Previously untreated patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced unresectable NSCLC were eligible. Before treatment, gold markers were inserted into the lung and the mediastinum of all patients. RTRT comprised a total of 66Gy at 2Gy/fraction, 5 days/week, for 7 weeks. Patients received paclitaxel at a starting dose of 40mg/m2 followed by carboplatin at a fixed area under the curve (AUC) of 2, as a weekly regimen with RTRT. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated by 5mg/m2 per level. Results: Eight patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC were enrolled and treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel (40mg/m2 and 45mg/m2), carboplatin (AUC=2) and RTRT. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at Level 1 (paclitaxel, 40mg/m2 and carboplatin, AUC=2). At Level 2 (paclitaxel, 45mg/m2 and carboplatin, AUC=2), two of five patients experienced DLTs, in the form of esophagitis and discontinuation of chemotherapy more than twice. The MTD and RD of paclitaxel were thus defined as 45mg/m2 and 40mg/m2, respectively. Conclusions: This phase I study was well tolerated and the RD of paclitaxel and carboplatin with RTRT is 40mg/m2 at AUC=2, respectively. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: Platinum-free regimens can represent an alternative for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) if similar efficacy is provided with better tolerability. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined irinotecan and S-1 for chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC. Methods: Chemotherapy consisted of 4-week cycles of intravenous irinotecan (100 mg/m2, days 1 and 15) and oral S-1 (80 mg/m2, days 1-14). The primary endpoint was response rate, while secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: A total of 112 cycles was administered to 40 patients (median 3 cycles; range 1-6 cycles). Twelve patients showed partial response and 17 patients had stable disease, representing a response rate of 30% and a disease control rate of 72.5%. Median survival time and median PFS were 16.1 and 4.8 months, respectively. Hematological toxicities of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (32.5%) and anemia (5.0%). The most common nonhematological toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included diarrhea (15.0%) and anorexia (17.5%). Patients homo- or heterozygous for UGTA1A*6 tended to show a higher incidence of grade 3 diarrhea (p = 0.055). Conclusion: The combination of irinotecan and S-1 offers good efficacy and tolerability for previously untreated advanced NSCLC. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Salvage treatment for acquired resistance to gefitinib has yet to be developed. We conducted the first prospective phase II study of gefitinib readministration in previous gefitinib responders. Methods: Gefitinib (250 mg/day) was readministered to patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who had achieved objective response to initial gefitinib and subsequently received cytotoxic chemotherapy after disease progression with initial gefitinib. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate with gefitinib readministration. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life, and toxicity. Changes in lung cancer-related symptoms were evaluated using the seven-item lung cancer subscale of the questionnaire. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled between February 2005 and January 2008. Most had received ≥3 regimens of chemotherapy. Response and disease-control rates for all patients were 0 and 44%. Median PFS and OS were 2.5 and 14.7 months, respectively. Four of 7 patients with stable disease experienced a long duration (≥6 months) of disease control without severe toxicity. Symptom improvement was observed in 2 of 12 patients (17%) for whom quality of life was evaluable. Conclusion: Gefitinib represents a useful therapeutic option for selected previous gefitinib responders. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We evaluated treatment practices and outcomes of Japanese stage III NSCLC patients. • Chemoradiotherapy was the commonest first-line treatment (46.1% of 744 patients). • Median OS and the 3-year OS rate in all patients were 25.4 months and 38.7%. To evaluate the actual treatment patterns with respective outcomes and the patient characteristics of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. Patients (aged ≥20 years at diagnosis) who were diagnosed with stage III NSCLC between January 2013 and December 2014 and underwent surgery, chemoradiotherapy (CRT), chemotherapy (CT), or radiotherapy (RT) at 11 institutions in Japan were consecutively registered in this retrospective, observational study (SOLUTION; UMIN000031385). Study measures included patient characteristics, first-line treatments, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, objective response rate, and incidence of radiation-related adverse events. The study population comprised 744 patients. The tumors were classified as stage IIIA and IIIB in 58.9% and 41.1% of patients, respectively. The tumors were considered resectable at diagnosis in 25.0% of patients. First-line treatments were surgery (20.0%), CRT (46.1%), CT (22.2%), and RT (11.7%). The median OS (mOS) in the overall population was 25.4 months and the 3-year OS rate was 38.7%. Among the four first-line treatment cohorts, OS most favored the surgery cohort: mOS was 43.4 months and the 3-year OS rate was 53.8%. Prognostic factors for OS in each treatment modality were analyzed using multivariable analysis and included the following: age, performance status, and histological type for the surgery cohort; sex, histological type, and primary lesion location (lower lobe) for the CRT cohort; and performance status and clinical stage for the RT cohort. The timing of peak incidence of pneumonitis from the start of first-line treatment was 18–20 and 12–14 weeks in the CRT and RT cohorts, respectively. Patients with clinical stage III NSCLC received a variety of treatments selected to the clinical background and tumor status, and we clarified the outcome and prognostic factors. These findings will be a useful reference for future studies evaluating newly introduced treatments for stage III NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Osimertinib is now a standard treatment for patients with previously untreated EGFR -mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We here investigated whether the combination of osimertinib with cytotoxic chemotherapy might hold additive efficacy, as well as tolerability. We conducted an open-label randomised phase 2 study to evaluate osimertinib and carboplatin-pemetrexed combination in comparison with osimertinib monotherapy in EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC patients who experienced disease progression associated with the emergence of the T790M resistance mutation of EGFR during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The primary endpoint was PFS, with secondary endpoints, including OS, response, and safety. Given that osimertinib was approved as a first-line treatment during the study, patient accrual was discontinued, and a final analysis was performed for the 62 enrolled patients. Median PFS was 15.8 months for the osimertinib monotherapy group and 14.6 months for the combination therapy group (hazard ratio of 1.09, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.51–2.32; P =.83). Median OS was not reached in either group. The overall response rate was 71.4% in the osimertinib monotherapy group and 53.6% in the combination group. The frequency or severity of known adverse events in the combination group was comparable to those with carboplatin and pemetrexed previously reported, and novel adverse events were not observed in this study. This is the first randomised study to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination of osimertinib and cytotoxic chemotherapy for EGFR -mutated NSCLC. The addition of chemotherapy to osimertinib as a second-line treatment did not prolong survival, while it was found to be generally tolerable. This combination strategy will be further validated in the first-line setting. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) identifier: jRCTs071180062. • Combination of osimertinib and cytotoxic chemotherapy has not been yet investigated. • This randomised trial evaluated concurrent osimertinib and carboplatin-pemetrexed. • PFS, a primary endpoint, was similar between osimertinib group and combination group. • The combination of osimertinib and cytotoxic chemotherapy was found to be tolerable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]