Search

Objective: To investigate whether the combination of neoadjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NHIPEC) plus intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy (IV NACT) has superior efficacy to IV NACT alone. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Two tertiary referral university hospitals. Population Patients with ovarian cancer who received NACT‐interval debulking surgery (IDS) between 2012 and 2020. Methods: The tumour response to NACT was evaluated with the chemotherapy response score (CRS) system. Survival outcomes were compared. Main outcome measures: CRS 3, progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 127 patients were included, and 46 received NHIPEC plus IV NACT. The addition of NHIPEC was independently associated with an increased likelihood of CRS 3 (p = 0.033). Patients who received NHIPEC + IV NACT had significantly improved PFS compared with those who received IV NACT alone (median PFS: 22 versus 16 months, p < 0.001). The use of NHIPEC was identified as an independent predictor of PFS (p < 0.0001). OS did not differ significantly between treatment groups (p = 0.062), although a trend favouring NHIPEC was noted. Incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events and the surgical complexity score of IDS were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared with IV NACT alone, the combination of NHIPEC and IV NACT resulted in improved tumour response and longer PFS. The addition of NHIPEC did not increase the risk of adverse effects or affect the complexity of IDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The chemotherapy response score (CRS) system is a reproducible prognostic tool for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Achieving CRS 3 following NACT can be used as a surrogate for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This study aimed to identify predictors of CRS 3 and develop a predictive nomogram. Methods: Data were extracted from 106 HGSC patients receiving NACT. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors for CRS 3. A nomogram was established based on the multivariate regression model. Results: All patients received three cycles of NACT, and CRS 3 was observed in 24 (22.6%) patients. Compared with patients in the CRS 1–2 group, patients in the CRS 3 groups had significantly improved PFS (log-rank test P < 0.0001). The multivariate regression analysis identified post-NACT CA125, percent decrease in CA125, post-NACT human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and post-NACT hemoglobin level as independent predictors of CRS 3. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed goodness-of-fit of this regression model (P = 0.272). The nomogram including these factors presented good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.82), good calibration (mean absolute error = 0.039), and a net benefit within the threshold probabilities of CRS 3 > 5%. Conclusions: We validated the prognostic role of the CRS system and developed a nomogram that predicts the possibility of CRS 3 following NACT. The nomogram helps to identify patients who would benefit the most from NACT. More studies are warranted to validate this model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]