Search

Background: Preterm children face higher risk of cognitive and academic deficits compared with their full-term peers. The objective of this study was to describe early childhood cognitive ability and kindergarten academic achievement across gestational age at birth in a population-based longitudinal cohort.Methods: The study population included singletons born at 24-42 weeks gestation enrolled in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort (n = 6150 for 2-year outcome, n = 4450 for kindergarten outcome). Home-based assessments measured cognitive ability at 2 years and reading and mathematics achievement at kindergarten age. Linear regression models estimated the association between gestational age and cognitive and academic scores using four different ways of modelling gestational age: continuous variable in linear and quadratic terms; categories for individual weeks; and clinical categories for early preterm, moderate preterm, late preterm, early term, full term, late term, and post-term.Results: Children born at early preterm (24-27 weeks), moderate preterm (28-33 weeks), and late preterm (34-36 weeks) scored significantly worse than full-term (39-40 weeks) peers on 2-year and kindergarten assessments; however, no deficits were observed for early term (37-38 weeks). These categories were a clinically useful and parsimonious approach to stratifying risk of adverse cognitive and academic outcomes.Conclusions: This study estimated the relative performance of children born at 24-42 weeks in a population-based birth cohort using multiple approaches to modelling gestational age, providing a more rigorous understanding of the relationships between the full spectrum of gestational age and cognitive and academic outcomes in early childhood and at school age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. Research has shown inconsistencies across studies examining sleep problems in children with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is possible that these inconsistencies are due to sleep lab adaptation. The goal of the current study was to investigate the possibility that children with ADHD adapt differently to the sleep lab than do typically developing (TD) children. Patients and Methods. Actigraphy variables were compared between home and the sleep lab. Sleep lab adaptation reports from the parent and child were compared between children with ADHD (η = 25) and TD children (η= 25). Results. Based on actigraphy, both groups had reduced sleep duration and reduced wake after sleep onset in the sleep lab compared to home. The only interaction effect was that TD children had increased sleep efficiency in the sleep lab compared to home. Conclusions. The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that children with ADHD adjust to the sleep lab differently than their typically developing peers. However, both groups of children did sleep differently in the sleep lab compared to home, and this needs to be considered when generalizing research findings from a sleep lab environment to children's sleep in general. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]