Search

Aim: To evaluate an integrated community case management programme for sick children aged 2 to 59 months in western Kenya using the Research, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework., Methods: This was a prospective observational research project conducted between December 2013 and February 2016. Outcome variables were measured before, during and at end of implementation using a series of surveys as well as by looking at routine service statistics., Results: A total of 2604 community health workers were trained in 245 community units. The average post-training knowledge level (73.5%) and retention rates (89.7) of trained community health workers was high. At the end of study, there was an increase in the proportion of children who received appropriate treatment for diarrhoea (49.2%), pneumonia (19.5%), malaria (16.4%) and vitamin A (51.5%) from baseline. Community health workers were able to assess, classify and treat sick children with a similar quality as that provided by facility-based healthcare workers (>85% concordance)., Conclusion: Based on the RE-AIM metrics, our results demonstrate promising practical approaches and outcomes of a large-scale implementation of integrated community case management in western Kenya. The findings have important implications for future design and expansion of the programme in Kenya., (© 2018 World Health Organization; licensed by Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

There are few examples of sustained nationally organised, evidence-informed clinical guidelines development processes in Sub-Saharan Africa. We describe the evolution of efforts from 2005 to 2015 to support evidence-informed decision making to guide admission hospital care practices in Kenya. The approach to conduct reviews, present evidence, and structure and promote transparency of consensus-based procedures for making recommendations improved over four distinct rounds of policy making. Efforts to engage important voices extended from government and academia initially to include multiple professional associations, regulators and practitioners. More than 100 people have been engaged in the decision-making process; an increasing number outside the research team has contributed to the conduct of systematic reviews, and 31 clinical policy recommendations has been developed. Recommendations were incorporated into clinical guideline booklets that have been widely disseminated with a popular knowledge and skills training course. Both helped translate evidence into practice. We contend that these efforts have helped improve the use of evidence to inform policy. The systematic reviews, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approaches and evidence to decision-making process are well understood by clinicians, and the process has helped create a broad community engaged in evidence translation together with a social or professional norm to use evidence in paediatric care in Kenya. Specific sustained efforts should be made to support capacity and evidence-based decision making in other African settings and clinical disciplines., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)