Search

Children face many threats that have implications for their future. Empirical evidence on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on children's health and its variation across geography remains limited. Parents (n = 340) and their primary school-aged children in five Australian states completed anonymised online questionnaires early during the pandemic in mid-2020. COVID-19-related forms of worry were measured, and contributing variables were examined. Most children were worried: 89% were worried about contracting the virus, and 79% were worried about playing outdoors. Forms of worry varied by ethnic background. There were geographical patterns in variables contributing to children's worry aligning with COVID-19 morbidity and mortality across all states. Parents' characteristics of age and history of distress symptoms, daily exposure to pandemic-related news, and parents themselves being worried predicted children's worry. Technology use lacked predictive power. The outcome has implications with international relevance: children living in stressful environments, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, are highly vulnerable despite not personally being at a high health risk. During health crises, parents are urged to limit children's exposure to unfiltered news and care for their children's and their own mental health. Timely intervention and better access to mental health care may help mitigate the impact of health crises on children. Listening to children's voices and addressing the diverse needs of all communities can promote equitable children's well-being. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Numerous studies have examined the association between safety and primary school-aged children's forms of active mobility. However, variations in studies' measurement methods and the elements addressed have contributed to inconsistencies in research outcomes, which may be forming a barrier to advancing researchers' knowledge about this field. To assess where current research stands, we have synthesised the methodological measures in studies that examined the effects of neighbourhood safety exposure (perceived and measured) on children's outdoor active mobility behaviour and used this analysis to propose future research directions. Method: A systematic search of the literature in six electronic databases was conducted using pre-defined eligibility criteria and was concluded in July 2020. Two reviewers screened the literature abstracts to determine the studies' inclusion, and two reviewers independently conducted a methodological quality assessment to rate the included studies. Results: Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria. Active mobility behaviour and health characteristics were measured objectively in 12 out of the 25 studies and were reported in another 13 studies. Twenty-one studies overlooked spatiotemporal dimensions in their analyses and outputs. Delineations of children's neighbourhoods varied within 10 studies' objective measures, and the 15 studies that opted for subjective measures. Safety perceptions obtained in 22 studies were mostly static and primarily collected via parents, and dissimilarities in actual safety measurement methods were present in 6 studies. The identified schematic constraints in studies' measurement methods assisted in outlining a three-dimensional relationship between 'what' (determinants), 'where' (spatial) and 'when' (time) within a methodological conceptual framework. Conclusions: The absence of standardised measurement methods among relevant studies may have led to the current diversity in findings regarding active mobility, spatial (locality) and temporal (time) characteristics, the neighbourhood, and the representation of safety. Ignorance of the existing gaps and heterogeneity in measures may impact the reliability of evidence and poses a limitation when synthesising findings, which could result in serious biases for policymakers. Given the increasing interest in children's health studies, we suggested alternatives in the design and method of measures that may guide future evidence-based research for policymakers who aim to improve children's active mobility and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]