Search

Objectives Due to their medical and technology dependence, families of children with medical complexity (CMC) have significant costs associated with care. Financial impact on families in general have been described, but detailed exploration of expenses in specific categories has not been systematically explored. Our objective was to describe out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses incurred by caregivers of CMC and to determine factors associated with increased expenditures. Methods This is a secondary observational analysis of data primary caregiver-reported OOP expenses as part of a randomized control trial conducted in Ontario, Canada. Caregivers completed questionnaires reporting OOP costs. Descriptive statistics were utilized to report OOP expenses and a linear regression model was conducted. Results 107 primary caregivers of CMC were included. The median (IQR) age of participants was 34.5 years (30.5 to 40.5) and 83.2% identified as the mother. The majority were married or common-law (86.9%) and 50.5% were employed. The participant's children [median (IQR) age 4.5 (2.2 to 9.7); 57.9% male] most commonly had a neurological/neuromuscular primary diagnosis (46.1%) and 88% utilized medical technology. Total OOP expenses were $8,639 CDN annually (IQR = $4,661 to $31,326) with substantial expenses related to childcare/homemaking, travel to appointments, hospitalizations, and device costs. No factors associated with greater likelihood of OOP expenses were identified. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Conclusion Caregivers of CMC incur significant OOP expenses related to the care of their children resulting in financial burden. Future exploration of the financial impact on caregiver productivity, employment, and identification of resources to mitigate OOP expenses will be important for this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have complex chronic conditions with significant functional impairment, contributing to high caregiving demand. This study seeks to explore impacts of parental caregiving for CMC. Fifteen caregivers of CMC followed at a tertiary care hospital participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were concurrently analyzed using a qualitative description framework until thematic saturation was reached. Codes were grouped by shared concepts to clarify emergent findings. Four affected domains of parental caregiver experience with associated subthemes (in parentheses) were identified: personal (identity, physical health, mental health), family (marriage, siblings, family quality of life), social (time limitations, isolating lived experience), and financial (employment, medical costs, accessibility costs). Despite substantial challenges, caregivers identified two core determinants of personal resilience: others' support (hands-on, interpersonal, informational, material) and a positive outlook (self-efficacy, self-compassion, reframing expectations). Further research is needed to understand the unique needs and strengths of caregivers for this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Children with medical complexity (CMC) are a medically fragile subset of children who rely on parental caregivers for substantial care needs. Caregivers of CMC often experience adverse health outcomes such as depression and anxiety, sleep deprivation, financial hardships, and social isolation. Caregivers of CMC are at risk of premature mortality, which is thought to be mediated by chronic and elevated stress, as well as psychiatric morbidity risk. Access to mental health care, where the needs of both the caregiver and child are considered, can enable caregivers to meet high caregiving demands and improve both child and caregiver outcomes. We describe the Caring for the Caregiver (C4C) model, a novel integrated stepped care model consisting of collaboration between a psychiatrist and a pediatric complex care program. This model provides support in 3 steps: 1) early identification of distress, 2) social work assessment, intervention and psychotherapy, and 3) psychiatric care, including diagnosis or medication initiation, for caregivers of CMC. This innovative model will be the first to embed support for the mental health needs of caregivers of CMC within a pediatric team, facilitating access to psychiatric care and serving as a foundation for future integrated stepped care models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Children with medical complexity (CMC) are individuals with complex chronic conditions who have substantial health care needs, functional limitations, and significant use of health care. By nature of their health status, they have many care providers across multiple settings, making information sharing critical to their health and safety. Connecting2gether (C2), a weband mobile-based patient-facing platform, was codeveloped with families to support and empower parental caregivers, improve information sharing, and facilitate care delivery. C2 also provided a live platform coach to conduct parental feedback and coaching sessions, which included answering questions, providing advice on usage, and addressing technological issues. Objective: This study was conducted to understand the experience of parental caregivers using the C2 platform and the role of the live platform coach. This study is a subset of a larger study assessing the feasibility of C2 in the care of CMC. Methods: Parental caregivers (n=33) participated in biweekly sessions to provide feedback and receive real-time platform use support from a trained research team member acting as a live platform coach. Parental caregivers were asked about the utility and usability of C2's features. Questions, platform issues, and feedback were recorded on a standardized electronic data collection tool. A thematic analysis was performed to analyze parental comments, and codes were categorized into key themes. The number of comments corresponding with each code was quantified. Results: A total of 166 parental feedback and coaching sessions were conducted, with an average of 5 sessions per parental caregiver (range 1-7). There were 33 (85%) parental caregivers that participated in at least one coaching session. Technical issues and difficulties navigating C2 were addressed in real time during the sessions to encourage platform engagement. Four key themes were identified: (1) live platform coach, (2) barriers to platform usage and technical challenges, (3) platform requests and modifications, and (4) parent partnership and empowerment. Conclusions: Parental caregivers describe C2 as a valuable tool, acting as a facilitator for enhanced care coordination and communication. Parental caregiver feedback showed that the live platform coach was a critical tool in educating on platform use and addressing technological concerns. Further study of the use of the C2 platform and its role in the care of CMC is needed to understand the possible benefits and cost-effectiveness of this technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Children with medical complexity (CMC) are hypothesized to have unique housing and accessibility needs due to their medical fragility and medical technology dependency; however, research on prevalence and types of housing need in CMC is limited. The objective was to describe housing need in families of CMC, and to compare housing need across CMC, children with one chronic condition (Type 1 diabetes; CT1D) and healthy children (HC). Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study assessed housing suitability, adequacy, affordability, stress, stability, and accessibility using survey methodology. Participants were caregivers of CMC, CT1D and HC at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. The association of housing need outcomes across groups was analyzed using logistic and ordinal logistic regression models, adjusting for income, educational attainment, employment status, community type, immigration status, child age, and number of people in household. Results: Four hundred ninety caregivers participated. Caregivers of CMC reported increased risk of housing-related safety concerns (aOR 3.1 [1.3--7.5]), using a common area as a sleeping area (5.6 12.0--16.8]), reducing spending (4.6 [2.3 --9.5[) or borrowing money to afford rent (2.9 [1.2--6.7]), experiencing housing stress (3.3 [1.8--6.0]), and moving or considering moving to access health/community services (15.0 [6.4-37.6]) compared to HC. Conclusions: CMC were more likely to experience multiple indicators of housing need compared to CT1D and HC even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors, suggesting an association between complexity of child health conditions and housing need. Further research and practise should consider screening for and supporting housing need in CMC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]