Search

Against the backdrop of privatization experienced by Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in recent years, this study investigates how privatized firms change cash dividend payments. Using a difference-in-differences (DiD) research design, we find an increase in cash dividends following privatization. Additional analyses reveal two channels underlying the increase in dividend payouts – that is, reduced insider tunnelling and agency problems associated with cash holding, and improved information environment after privatization. Our findings enrich the literature on privatization by providing new insights into the underlying mechanisms explaining the increased cash dividends from the agency theory and information environment perspectives. • China has deepened the privatization of its SOEs in recent years. • The privatization process allows a difference-in-differences research design. • We find that privatized firms increase cash dividends following the privatization. • Reduced insider tunnelling and free cash flow problem explain the increase. • Enhanced information environment post privatization also explains the increase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines how state subsidies to firms affect corporate investment efficiency. Using archival data from a sample of Chinese listed firms over the 2007–2015 period, we find that government subsidies have a negative effect on firms' investment efficiency, and this negative effect is more pronounced for firms that are less financially constrained. Further analyses suggest that government subsidies are positively associated with firms' over-investment, although they alleviate under-investment. Our findings are robust to a series of tests to alleviate concerns about potential endogeneity and self-selection bias. • We ask if financial subsidies received from the state affect investment efficiency. • A negative effect is found that is more pronounced for less financially constrained firms. • Subsidies do alleviate under-investment. • But subsidies are positively associated with over-investment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]