Search

Objective: To determine whether there are significant differences in costs of treatment and readmission rates for hospital consultations undertaken by female versus male physicians in China. Methods: Using data from the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance program from January 2018 through October 2019, we investigated spending patterns and clinical outcomes for patients at tertiary hospitals in one of the largest cities in China by the gender of the attending physician. Our sample included 79,085 hospitalizations treated by 3993 physicians in internal medicine departments. We examined the association between physician gender and visit cost using a multivariable linear model. We examined the association between physician gender and 30-days readmission rates using a multivariable probability model. We adjusted for a rich set of patient characteristics, primary diagnosis fixed effects, and hospital fixed effects. In addition, we used patient fixed effects in a robustness analysis. Results: Adjusting for primary diagnosis fixed effects, spending per visit was 4.1% higher for patients treated by male physicians than for those treated by female physicians, a statistically significant difference (95% CI [1.5%, 6.7%]). This pattern persisted after further adjusting for hospital fixed effects (3.2% [1.2%, 5.2%]), patient characteristics (3.2% [1.2%, 5.1%]), and patient fixed effects (4.2% [1.8%, 6.7%]). The difference is mainly driven by higher spending on drugs (8.7% [3.9%, 13.6%]) and out-of-pocket costs (3.9% [1.7%, 6.0%]). No statistically significant differences were observed in the readmission rates of patients treated by male and female physicians in any of our three model specifications. Conclusions: Spending per visit was significantly higher among patients treated by male physicians than among those treated by female physicians, with the difference mainly driven by spending on drugs and out-of-pocket costs. No significant difference was observed in the hospital readmission rates of patients treated by male and female physicians. These findings have important implications for gender equality in medicine and health care quality and efficiency in developing countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In China, the government has encouraged the participation of private sector facilities in primary care to improve health care quality.Objective: We compare health care utilization patterns among patients who select private versus public community health centres (CHCs) for reimbursed outpatient services.Methods: This paper uses data from the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance scheme from 2013 to 2016 in one of the largest cities in China. We used a Poisson model and a logistic model to examine outcomes on monthly outpatient visits and the probability of hospitalization, respectively.Results: Compared with being a user of a public CHC, being a user of a private CHC is associated with a 26.2% lower incidence rate of outpatient visits to hospitals [95% confidence interval (CI): 30.1-21.8%] and no difference in rates of visits to CHCs or hospitalization. Among patients with diabetes or hypertension, being a user of a private CHC is associated with a 12.9% lower incidence rate of outpatient visits to CHCs (95% CI: 19.8-5.4%), a 25.6% lower incidence rate of outpatient visits to hospitals (95% CI: 21.4-19.5%) and 22.3% higher odds of hospitalization (95% CI: 3.5-44.7%).Conclusion: Being a user of a private CHC is associated with a reduction in outpatient visits to hospitals, which aligns with the goal of reducing hospital congestion at the outpatient level. For patients with chronic diseases, being a user of a private CHC is associated with a higher probability of hospitalization. More research is needed to understand the reason for this difference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Large hospitals in China are overcrowded, while primary care tends to be underutilized, resulting in inefficient allocation of resources. This paper examines the impacts of a policy change in a mandatory public employee health insurance program in China designed to encourage the utilization of primary care by reducing patient cost-sharing. We use a unique administrative insurance claim dataset from the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) scheme between 2013 and 2015. The sample includes 40,024 individuals. We conduct an event-study analysis controlling for individual fixed effects and find that the change in cost-sharing increased primary care utilization, decreased non-primary care utilization, and increased total outpatient utilization without impacting total spending. In addition, the policy change did not affect the likelihood of having avoidable inpatient admissions. Further, patients with hypertension or diabetes increased their primary care utilization even when using additional coverage for patients with chronic diseases, the cost-sharing rates for which did not change during the period of our study, rather than their standard UEBMI benefits. This study provides evidence that changes in cost-sharing can affect healthcare utilization, suggesting that supply-side incentives can play an important role in building a primary care–based integrated healthcare delivery system in China. • A change in cost-sharing for primary care increased primary care utilization. • The policy change also led to a decrease in non-primary care utilization. • Incentives can help build a primary care–based integrated healthcare system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]