Search

Background: Arthritis is an important and sometimes life-threatening complication in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID)., Objective: To describe a patient with CVID and arthritis due to Chlamydia pneumoniae, which is usually regarded as a respiratory tract pathogen and has not previously been detected in the synovial fluid by cell culture technique., Methods: Routine bacteriologic, virologic, mycologic, and tuberculosis cultures were performed. The patient's synovial fluid was examined for fastidious organisms that might be causative pathogens of arthritis, such as chlamydiae, and special cell culture methods were used. Serologic tests were performed to determine viral and bacteriologic etiology., Results: The patient had a history of recurrent respiratory tract infections, and the latest exacerbation was followed by arthritis. Cytologic examination of the fluid yielded abundant lymphocytes. Chlamydia pneumoniae was detected in synovial fluid specimens by cell culture technique. Her nasopharyngeal swab and sputum culture specimens were also positive for this pathogen. She was diagnosed as having arthritis caused by C pneumoniae and was given antibiotherapy., Conclusion: Chlamydia pneumoniae should be kept in mind as a causative pathogen in patients with CVID and arthritis, especially when effusion fluid is full of lymphocytes rather than polymorphonuclear cells and no organism is grown on routine cultures.

The aim of this study was to investigate the DNA of Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the first-void urine samples of patients with mucopurulent genital discharge and to compare the results with the urethral/endocervical swab culture method. First-void urine samples from 56 patients (46 female, 14 male) and urethral swab samples from 14 male patients were tested by PCR. Additionally, shell-vial culture method was performed for the urethral/endocervical swab samples which were collected from 46 female and 14 male patients. Four (2 females, 2 males) of the patients (7.1%) showed positive results by both of the methods. In five (8.9%) of the urine samples, internal control tests were found negative, indicating the presence of amplification inhibitors, and the culture results of these patients were also negative. Since the PCR method (Cobas Amplicor CT, Roche Diagnostic Systems, NJ, USA) which was used in the study included internal control programme to identify inhibitors in urine, the sensitivity was improved. As a result, the perfect (100%) correlation between culture and PCR methods, lead to the conclusion that PCR is a rapid and reliable method for the detection of C. trachomatis in urine samples, however more detailed studies are necessary related to the sensitivity and specificity of PCR method.