Search

Introduction: Gallbladder cancer is suspected preoperatively in only 30 % of all patients, while the other 70 % of cases are discovered incidentally by the pathologist (incidental or occult gallbladder cancer or IGBC). If gallbladder cancer is suspected preoperatively, an open cholecystectomy must be performed. The increasing rate of cholecystectomies via laparoscopy has lad to the detection of more gallbladder cancers in an early stage. Extended resection with regional lymph node dissection for T2 carcinomas and for more advanced cancer has been suggested. If IGBC is detected postoperatively by the pathologist after simple cholecystectomy, radical re-resection in cases of T2 tumours and more advanced stages is recommended. However, it has been argued that T1b cancers may have spread regionally or systemically at presentation and, thus, it remains debatable whether T1b cancers should be treated by simple cholecystectomy or by radical resection. PATIENTS / MATERIAL AND METHOD: This investigation was based on the German Registry of "Incidental Gallbladder Cancer" of the German Society of Surgery. In the present study, we evaluated whether T1 carcinoma patients do profit from a radical re-resection and if the different techniques of liver resection have comparable results in T1 carcinomas., Results: We analysed 684 cases of IGBC including 124 patients with T1 cancer with a 5-year survival of 48 %. An extended re-resection increased the 5-year survival up to 68 % for T1-IGBC. The analysis shows no advantage for re-resection of T1a cancer. In contrast, the current analysis shows a statistically significant survival benefit for re-resection of T1b cancers from 34 % to 75 %. The Registry data show a trend of better survival for the patients treated with the wedge resection technique compared to other resection techniques., Conclusion: For T1a cancer a simple cholecystectomy is sufficient. An immediate re-resection is highly recommended for patients with IGBC in T1b stage. The wedge resection technique combined with a locoregional lymphadenectomy of the hepatoduodenal ligament seems to be the strategy of choice for T1b cancer. An extended re-resection is necessary to determine the nodal status exactly, and to determine an exact definite staging for patients with T1b cancer., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: The use of the laparoscopic approach (LC) for gallbladder carcinoma and incidental gallbladder carcinomas (IGBC) remains controversial. However, recent studies suggest that LC has no adverse effects relative to the open approach. A definitive conclusion regarding the safety of LC that is based on data from a large patient cohort is needed., Methods: To draw a definite conclusion about the safety of LC in IGBC, data from the 837 patients with IGBC [registered in the German Registry (GR)] were analyzed., Results: Of the 837 patients, 492 underwent LC, 200 underwent open surgery (OC), and 142 initially underwent LC, but the approach was converted to OC. The 5-year survival rates of the three groups indicated that LC was associated with significantly better survival. LC was not associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with T1, T2, or T3 stage disease or in patients who underwent immediate radical re-resection (IRR; n = 330). LC was associated with a significant survival benefit in the 490 patients who did not undergo IRR. LC was comparable with OC in terms of overall recurrence rates and the rate of accidental intraoperative perforation., Conclusions: The GR data, which relate to a large homogenous patient cohort, showed that when other potential influencing factors, e.g., IRR were eliminated, the primary access technique had no effect on prognosis. Stage-adjusted therapy should always be performed irrespective of the primary access technique.

Introduction: Accidental intraoperative gallbladder perforation is a problem in laparoscopic surgery, especially in cases with incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC). The question is whether intraoperative gallbladder perforation has a prognostic disadvantage or a retrieval bag provides protection against tumor dissemination., Methods: A standardized questionnaire was sent to all German surgical clinics based on the central register of "incidental gallbladder carcinoma" of the German Society of Surgery founded in 1997., Results: In 592 IGBC-registered cases, there were 330 laparoscopies, 154 open surgeries, and intraoperative conversion was performed in 106 cases. Of laparoscopic surgeries (n = 330), the recurrence rate was 30%. The recurrence rate for cases with (174/330) and without (156/330) the use of retrieval bag was 32.2% and 27%, respectively. In laparoscopies with intraoperative gallbladder perforation (73/330 cases), the recurrence rate was 38.4%. Of these cases the recurrence rate with (51/73) and without (22/73) the use of retrieval bags was 39.2% and 36.4%, respectively. In 257 cases without intraoperative perforation, tumor recurrence rate was 27.2%, and it was 29.3% or 25.4% with (123/257) and without (134/257) the use of retrieval bags., Conclusions: According to the registry data, the intraoperative gallbladder perforation results in significant (P = 0.047) prognostic disadvantage and in these cases retrieval bags were used more often (P = 0.001). However, in IGBC cases if intraoperative gallbladder perforation has already happened, the use of retrieval bags had no protective effects.

Background: More than 75% of cholecystectomies are done laparoscopically and less than one-third of gallbladder carcinomas are known presurgically. It is supposed that the laparoscopic technique could adversely affect the prognosis of gallbladder cancer., Methods: The C-A-E has started a register of all cases of cholecystectomy with a postoperative incidental finding of gallbladder carcinoma. The aim is to compare the prospectively collected follow-up data on the outcome of these patients and to answer the question of whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy affects the prognosis of incidental gallbladder cancer., Results: A total of 377 cases have been recorded so far. These include 201 patients treated by the laparoscopic procedure, 119 by an open procedure, and 57 by an intraoperative conversion. The survival shows a significantly better life expectancy for the patients treated laparoscopically., Conclusion: The life expectancy is higher for the laparoscopically treated patients and this cannot be explained by the fact that the laparoscopic technique is used to treat the earlier stages of cancer. The access technique does not seem to influence the prognosis for gallbladder carcinomas.

Introduction: Results of earlier surveys raised the prospect that laparoscopic surgical procedures may specifically increase the risk of port wound metastasis and generally of tumour cell seeding if at the time of operation an unsuspected gallbladder cancer existed. Other observations lead to presume that laparoscopic technique could deteriorate the prognosis of gallbladder cancer. These assumptions are going to be verified by the CAES/ CAMIC-registry., Material and Method: The Workgroup Surgical Endoscopy (CAE) of the German Society of Surgery has started 1997 a registry of all cases of cholecystectomy--laparoscopic as well open--with a postoperative incidental finding of a gallbladder carcinoma. The aim of our registry is to compare the prospectively collected follow up data on the outcome of these patients and to answer the question whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy affects the course and the prognosis of patients with unsuspected gallbladder cancer., Results: Until now 142 cases of incidental gallbladder cancer following laparoscopic and 79 cases following open cholecystectomy as well as 24 cases after intraoperative conversion to the open procedure have been recorded. The median follow up runs up to 27 (1-69) months. Following laparoscopic primary procedure we registered 10 port site metastases (7 %), following open primary procedure 4 (5.1 %) wound recurrences. The total recurrence rate at the moment is about 27 % after laparoscopic treatment and 31 % for conventionally operated patients. 70 of the 245 patients underwent a second radical procedure after diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma. A postoperative combined radio- and chemotherapy was undertaken in 4 cases, a chemotherapy alone in 14 cases. 64 patients already died due to the underlining disease., Discussion: At the present, after a median follow up of 27 months, the incidence of abdominal wall recurrences is very similar following laparoscopic and conventional procedure (7 % vs. 5.1 %). The total incidence of recurrences is at the moment slightly higher following open cholecystectomy (31 % vs. 27 %). The access technique, open or laparoscopic, doesn't seem to influence the prognosis of unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma. Until now we could not find disadvantages for the laparoscopically operated group.

Port site metastasis is a well-documented event after laparoscopic procedures in cancer patients. We summarize current epidemiological knowledge about the risk of this complication after laparoscopic/conventional cholecystectomy in patients with unexpected gallbladder cancer as well as other intraabdominal malignancies. We found 174 cases of port site metastasis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 12 recurrences in the surgical scar after converted or open cholecystectomy. A review of all case reports and its comparison with four international surveys show a 14% incidence of port site metastases 7 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cancer. Similar numbers are available for open cholecystectomy. Our data suggest that abdominal wall metastases of gallbladder cancer are not a specific complication of laparoscopy. The long-term prognosis of patients with unknown gallbladder cancer however seems to be worsened by laparoscopy. The registry of the German Society of Surgery, which prospectively compares follow-up and prognosis of all cases of cholecystectomy, laparoscopic as well as open, in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer will definitively clarify whether laparoscopy affects the prognosis of patients with unsuspected gallbladder cancer.

The aim of the study was to determine if tumor seeding during laparoscopic surgery for cancer is a rare event or a typical complication of this procedure. Laparoscopic staging and treatment of intraabdominal tumors is increasing in gastroenterology, gynecology, and general surgery. A total of 1052 questionnaires were mailed to surgical department chairmen, members of the German Society of Surgery, Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery, and Austrian Society of Minimal Invasive Surgery asking them to list their department's experience with tumor seeding after laparoscopy for nonapparent or known malignancy. There were 607 (57.7%) surgeons who reported a total of 117,840 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 409 incidental gallbladder carcinomas, and 412 laparoscopies on patients with colorectal carcinoma. Altogether 109 patients who developed tumor recurrence in connection with laparoscopic surgery have been reported. Port-site recurrence was identified in 70 of 409 patients (17.1%) with a median of 180 days following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for nonapparent gallbladder carcinoma. In 8 cases (11.5%) a protective plastic bag had been used for gallbladder retrieval. Six patients without port-site metastases were found to have a diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis a median of 120 days after cholecystectomy. Of 412 laparoscopies for colorectal cancer, 19 cases (4.6%) of tumor seeding have been reported, 16 of which (3.9%) had documented port-site and scar recurrences a median of 196 days after laparoscopy. The tumor specimen was intact, and a plastic bag was used for extraction in seven cases. In 14 patients trocar-site metastases have been reported a median of 70 days after laparoscopy for different nonapparent or known malignancies. The probability of developing abdominal wall metastasis is higher after laparoscopy for cancer than after open surgery. An intact surgical specimen and the use of a plastic retrieval bag do not exclude the risk of port-site recurrences. These facts and the early appearance of peritoneal carcinosis in a few cases of intraabdominal malignancies seem to confirm a specific laparoscopic risk for intraperitoneal tumor cell seeding and implantation.

We quantified and compared the advantages and disadvantages of disposable and reusable laparoscopic instruments in a prospective, randomised study of 158 cholecystectomies. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: 80 underwent surgery with reusable instruments, 78 with disposable instruments. The following parameters were recorded in both groups: duration of surgery, number of complications, technical problems during surgery, rate of conversion to open surgery, subjective postoperative pain, postoperative hospitalisation time, length of inability to work, and postoperative evaluation by the operating room personnel. No overall differences were found in subjective pain, postoperative complications, postoperative hospitalisation time, or time before returning to work. Surgery with disposable instruments was on the whole faster, with fewer conversions to open surgery, but this was statistically non-significant. Reusable instruments were associated with a statistically significant increase in the rate of intraoperative, instrument-related difficulties. In spite of longer operation times and higher personnel costs with reusable instruments, we found that cholecystectomy with reusable instruments costs an average of 1,015 DM less per procedure.

The pneumoperitoneum, generally used for all laparoscopic procedures, can lead to specific disadvantages and result in complications, and it furthermore represents a restriction of the surgeon's freedom of movement. In July, 1993 we started doing laparoscopic surgery without the pneumoperitoneum. Under direct vision and digital control, a fan-shaped wall retractor, which is attached to an electric lift arm, is introduced into the abdominal cavity. After raising the abdominal wall, the scope is introduced through the same access and the laparoscopic procedure can be started without the technical and pathophysiological problems which may occur when using a pneumoperitoneum. In this gasless laparoscopic procedure, simple valveless trocars and instruments can be used. During anaesthesia, neither an increased ventilation nor an enlarged ventilation pressure is necessary in this way we performed gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 50 patients. We observed 5 wound infections as related complications. We had to change the surgical procedure seven times. The retraction technique creates a sufficient but not optimal exposure to the gallbladder. Intraoperative changes of the instruments, suction and specimen removal appeared easier. Both conventional and laparoscopic surgical instruments were introduced through the valveless trocars. Our experience demonstrates the practicability of this technique and potential advantages.

The pneumoperitoneum as a precondition of laparoscopic procedures represents a restriction of the surgeons freedom of movement and causes rare but typical complications. In July 1993 we started doing laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using a pneumoperitoneum. Under direct vision and digital control the retractor blades are introduced into the abdominal cavity via minilaparotomy. The retractor is attached to an electrically powered mechanical arm and raised. The scope is introduced through the same access and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed using the established technique without instilling a pneumoperitoneum. Both conventional and laparoscopic surgical instruments were introduced through valveless trocars and unlimited suction without loss of gas and exposure is possible. Metabolic and hemodynamic alterations associated with the intraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide are omitted. So far we did gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 patients. We didn't see any related complications. Four times we had to change the surgical procedure. In comparison to the traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a CO2-pneumoperitoneum the results of the first gasless procedures demonstrate possible advantages.