Search

Energetic particle precipitation into the atmosphere has been identified as a key loss process for electrons in the Earth's outer radiation belt region. However, direct measurements of the electron flux precipitating into the atmosphere are challenging from high altitude low inclination spacecraft, such as the Van Allen Probes, due to the small angular size of the loss cone along the orbital path of these high‐altitude spacecraft. Here we use data from the Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellites (POES)/Space Environment Monitor in low‐Earth orbit to assess the relationship between the trapped and precipitating electron flux in integral energy channels >30, >100, and >300 keV. Our results highlight that there is a strong non‐linear relationship between the flux of trapped and precipitating electrons, with the ratio of precipitating to trapped flux only becoming significantly enhanced once the trapped flux reaches a critical level. This transition from low to high levels of precipitation is consistent with the theory proposed by Kennel and Petschek (K‐P) (1966) https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ071i001p00001, whereby intense chorus waves are excited and trigger pitch angle diffusion, resulting in energetic particle precipitation and limiting the trapped flux. Using electron flux data from POES and chorus wave data from the Van Allen Probes, we further test the observations against predictions from the K‐P theory. A particle tracing model is also utilized to illustrate a direct link between the drift paths of injected electrons, the occurrence of chorus waves and the spatial distribution of strong electron precipitation into the atmosphere at different energies. Key Points: Trapped and precipitating electron fluxes become equal once the trapped flux hits a flux limit, indicating strong diffusion is occurringEvents with both high trapped and precipitating flux occur more often in the dawn sector, matching the drift paths of injected electronsIntense chorus waves occur mostly near dawn, suggesting injected electrons excite them and limit the flux via a Kennel‐Petschek‐like process [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microbursts are impulsive (<1 s) injections of electrons into the atmosphere, thought to be caused by nonlinear scattering by chorus waves. Although attempts have been made to quantify their contribution to outer belt electron loss, the uncertainty in the overall size and duration of the microburst region is typically large, so that their contribution to outer belt loss is uncertain. We combine datasets that measure chorus waves (Van Allen Probes [RBSP], Arase, ground‐based VLF stations) and microburst (>30 keV) precipitation (FIREBIRD II and AC6 CubeSats, POES) to determine the size of the microburst‐producing chorus source region beginning on 5 December 2017. We estimate that the long‐lasting (∼30 hr) microburst‐producing chorus region extends from 4 to 8 Δ ${\Delta}$MLT and 2–5 Δ ${\Delta}$L. We conclude that microbursts likely represent a major loss source of outer radiation belt electrons for this event. Plain Language Summary: Microbursts are short‐duration (<1 s) bursts of electrons that precipitate from the magnetosphere into the atmosphere. Microbursts are thought to be a result of scattering by a plasma wave called chorus. Attempts have been made to understand the contribution microburst precipitation has on electron loss, which helps the outer radiation belt recover after enhancements during storms. The contribution depends on the overall size and duration of the microburst region. We combine datasets that measure chorus waves and microburst precipitation to determine the size and duration of a microburst region beginning on 5 December 2017. Our results show that microbursts are likely a significant source of electron loss. Key Points: We use multipoint observations to estimate the size of a long‐lasting microburst‐producing chorus region beginning on 5 December 2017We estimate that the microburst‐producing chorus region for this event extends from 4 to 8 Δ ${\Delta}$MLT and 2–5 Δ ${\Delta}$LMicroburst precipitation from this event likely constitutes a major source of electron loss from the outer radiation belt [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]