Search

Histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation is a dynamic modification. In budding yeast, H3K4 methylation is catalyzed by the Set1-COMPASS methyltransferase complex and is removed by Jhd2, a JMJC domain family demethylase. The catalytic JmjC and JmjN domains of Jhd2 have the ability to remove all three degrees (mono-, di-, and tri-) of H3K4 methylation. Jhd2 also contains a plant homeodomain (PHD) finger required for its chromatin association and H3K4 demethylase functions. The Jhd2 PHD finger associates with chromatin independent of H3K4 methylation and the H3 N-terminal tail. Therefore, how Jhd2 associates with chromatin to perform H3K4 demethylation has remained unknown. We report a novel interaction between the Jhd2 PHD finger and histone H2A. Two residues in H2A (Phe-26 and Glu-57) serve as a binding site for Jhd2 in vitro and mediate its chromatin association and H3K4 demethylase functions in vivo. Using RNA sequencing, we have identified the functional target genes for Jhd2 and the H2A Phe-26 and Glu-57 residues. We demonstrate that H2A Phe-26 and Glu-57 residues control chromatin association and H3K4 demethylase functions of Jhd2 during positive or negative regulation of transcription at target genes. Importantly, we show that H2B Lys-123 ubiquitination blocks Jhd2 from accessing its binding site on chromatin, and thereby, we have uncovered a second mechanism by which H2B ubiquitination contributes to the trans-histone regulation of H3K4 methylation. Overall, our study provides novel insights into the chromatin binding dynamics and H3K4 demethylase functions of Jhd2., (© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.)

Ordered nucleosome disassembly and reassembly are required for eukaryotic DNA replication. The facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) complex, a histone chaperone comprising Spt16 and SSRP1, is involved in DNA replication as well as transcription. FACT associates with the MCM helicase, which is involved in DNA replication initiation and elongation. Although the FACT-MCM complex is reported to regulate DNA replication initiation, its functional role in DNA replication elongation remains elusive. To elucidate the functional role of FACT in replication fork progression during DNA elongation in the cells, we generated and analyzed conditional SSRP1 gene knock-out chicken (Gallus gallus) DT40 cells. SSRP1-depleted cells ceased to grow and exhibited a delay in S-phase cell cycle progression, although SSRP1 depletion did not affect the level of chromatin-bound DNA polymerase α or nucleosome reassembly on daughter strands. The tracking length of newly synthesized DNA, but not origin firing, was reduced in SSRP1-depleted cells, suggesting that the S-phase cell cycle delay is mainly due to the inhibition of replication fork progression rather than to defects in the initiation of DNA replication in these cells. We discuss the mechanisms of how FACT promotes replication fork progression in the cells.

The facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) complex affects nuclear DNA transactions in a chromatin context. Though the involvement of FACT in eukaryotic DNA replication has been revealed, a clear understanding of its biochemical behavior during DNA replication still remains elusive. Here, we analyzed the chromatin-binding dynamics of FACT using Xenopus egg extract cell-free system. We found that FACT has at least two distinct chromatin-binding phases: (1) a rapid chromatin-binding phase at the onset of DNA replication that did not involve origin licensing and (2) a second phase of chromatin binding that initiated after origin licensing. Intriguingly, early-binding FACT dissociated from chromatin when DNA replication was blocked by the addition of Cdc6 in the licensed state before origin firing. Cdc6-induced removal of FACT was blocked by the inhibition of origin licensing with geminin, but not by suppressing the activity of DNA polymerases, CDK, or Cdc7. Furthermore, chromatin transfer experiments revealed that impairing the later binding of FACT severely compromises DNA replication activity. Taken together, we propose that even though FACT has rapid chromatin-binding activity, the binding pattern of FACT on chromatin changes after origin licensing, which may contribute to the establishment of its functional link to the DNA replication machinery., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Eukaryotic chromatin is regulated by chromatin factors such as histone modification enzymes, chromatin remodeling complexes and histone chaperones in a variety of DNA-dependent reactions. Among these reactions, transcription in the chromatin context is well studied. On the other hand, how other DNA-dependent reactions, including postreplicative homologous recombination, are regulated in the chromatin context remains elusive. Here, histone H3 Lys56 acetylation, mediated by the histone acetyltransferase Rtt109 and the histone chaperone Cia1/Asf1, is shown to be required for postreplicative sister chromatid recombination. This recombination did not occur in the cia1/asf1-V94R mutant, which lacks histone binding and histone chaperone activities and which cannot promote the histone acetyltransferase activity of Rtt109. A defect in another histone chaperone, CAF-1, led to an increase in acetylated H3-K56 (H3-K56-Ac)-dependent postreplicative recombination. Some DNA lesions recognized by the putative ubiquitin ligase complex Rtt101-Mms1-Mms22, which is reported to act downstream of the H3-K56-Ac signaling pathway, seem to be increased in CAF-1 defective cells. Taken together, these data provide the framework for a postreplicative recombination mechanism controlled by histone modifiers and histone chaperones in multiple ways.

The surfaces of core histones in nucleosome are exposed as required for factor recognition, or buried for histone-DNA and histone-histone interactions. To understand the mechanisms by which nucleosome structure and function are coordinately altered in DNA-mediated reactions, it is essential to define the roles of both exposed and buried residues and their functional relationships. For this purpose, we developed GLASP (GLobal Analysis of Surfaces by Point mutation) and GLAMP (GLobal Analysis of Mutual interaction surfaces of multi-subunit protein complex by Point mutation) strategies, both of which are comprehensive analyses by point mutagenesis of exposed and buried residues in nucleosome, respectively. Four distinct DNA-mediated reactions evaluated by Ty suppression (the Spt(-) phenotype), and sensitivities to 6-azauracil (6AU), hydroxyurea (HU), and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), require common and different GLAMP residues. Mutated GLAMP residues at the interface between histones H2A and H2B mainly affect the Spt(-) phenotype but not HU and MMS sensitivities. Interestingly, among the mutated GLAMP residues surrounding the histone H3-H3' interface, some equally affect the Spt(-) phenotype, and HU and MMS sensitivities, whereas others differentially affect the Spt(-) phenotype, and HU and MMS sensitivities. Based on these and other results, the functional relationships among chromatin factors and GLASP and GLAMP residues provide insights into nucleosome disassembly/assembly processes in DNA-mediated reactions.

Currently, there is no method to distinguish between the roles of a subunit in one multisubunit protein complex from its roles in other complexes in vivo. This is because a mutation in a common subunit will affect all complexes containing that subunit. Here, we describe a unique method to discriminate between the functions of a common subunit in different multisubunit protein complexes. In this method, a common subunit in a multisubunit protein complex is genetically fused to a subunit that is specific to that complex and point mutated. The resulting phenotype(s) identify the specific function(s) of the subunit in that complex only. Histone H2B is a common subunit in nucleosomes containing H2A/H2B or Htz1/H2B dimers. The H2B was fused to H2A or Htz1 and point mutated. This strategy revealed that H2B has common and distinct functions in different nucleosomes. This method could be used to study common subunits in other multisubunit protein complexes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A nucleosome is composed of intrinsically disordered histone tails and a structured nucleosome core surrounded by DNA. A variety of modifiable residues on the intrinsically disordered histone tails have been identified in the last decade. Mapping of the functional residues on the structured nucleosome core surface was recently initiated by global analysis of a comprehensive histone point mutant library (histone-GLibrary). It stands to reason that a functional relationship exists between modifiable residues on the intrinsically disordered histone tails and functional residues on the structured nucleosome core; however, this matter has been poorly explored. During transcription elongation, trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 (H3-K36me3) is mediated by histone methyltransferase Set2, which binds to RNA polymerase II. Here, we used a histone-GLibrary that encompasses the nucleosomal DNA entry/exit site to show that six residues (H2A-G107, H2A-I112, H2A-L117, H3-T45, H3-R49 and H3-R52) form a surface on the structured nucleosome core and regulate H3-K36me3. Trimethylation at H3-K4 introduced by histone methyltransferase Set1 was not affected by the mutation of any of the six residues. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed that most of these residues are critical for the chromatin association of RNA polymerase II and Set2, suggesting that these components regulate H3-K36me3 through functional interactions with the structured nucleosome core surface. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nucleosomes around the promoter region are disassembled for transcription in response to various signals, such as acetylation and methylation of histones. Although the interactions between histone-acetylation-recognizing bromodomains and factors involved in nucleosome disassembly have been reported, no structural basis connecting histone modifications and nucleosome disassembly has been obtained. Here, we determined at 3.3 Å resolution the crystal structure of histone chaperone cell cycle gene 1 (CCG1) interacting factor A/antisilencing function 1 (ClA/ASF1) in complex with the double bromodomain in the CCG1/TAF1/TAF(II)250 subunit of transcription factor IID. Structural, biochemical, and biological studies suggested that interaction between double bromodomain and CIA/ASF1 is required for their colocalization, histone eviction, and pol II entry at active promoter regions. Furthermore, the present crystal structure has characteristics that can connect histone acetylation and CIA/ASF1-mediated histone eviction. These findings suggest that the molecular complex between CIA/ASF1 and the double bromodomain plays a key role in site-specific histone eviction at active promoter regions. The model we propose here is the initial structure-based model of the biological signaling from histone modifications to structural change of the nucleosome (hi-MOST model). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Histone chaperones assemble and disassemble nucleosomes in an ATP-independent manner and thus regulate the most fundamental step in the alteration of chromatin structure. The molecular mechanisms underlying histone chaperone activity remain unclear. To gain insights into these mechanisms, we solved the crystal structure of the functional domain of SET/TAF-Iβ/INHAT at a resolution of 2. Å. We found that SET/TAF-Iβ/INHAT formed a dimer that assumed a ‘headphone’-Iike structure. Each subunit of the SET/TAF-Iβ/INHAT dimer consisted of an N terminus, a backbone helix, and an ‘earmuff’ domain. It resembles the structure of the related protein NAP-l. Comparison of the crystal structures of SET/TAF-Iβ/INHAT and NAP-1 revealed that the two proteins were folded similarly except for an inserted helix. However, their backbone helices were shaped differently, and the relative dispositions of the backbone helix and the earmuff domain between the two proteins differed by ≈40°. Our biochemical analyses of mutants revealed that the region of SET/TAF-Iβ/INHAT that is engaged in histone chaperone activity is the bottom surface of the earmuff domain, because this surface bound both core histones and double-stranded DNA. This overlap or closeness of the activity surface and the binding surfaces suggests that the specific association among SET/TAF-Iβ/INHAT, core histones, and double-stranded DNA is requisite for histone chaperone activity. These findings provide insights into the possible mechanisms by which histone chaperones assemble and disassemble nudeosome structures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eukaryotic DNA is packaged into chromatin by histone proteins, which assemble the DNA into an organized, higher-order structure. The precise organization of chromatin is essential for faithful execution of DNA-mediated reactions such as transcription, DNA replication, DNA repair and DNA recombination. The organization of chromatin is considered to be regulated by a variety of post-translational modifications of histones, such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation and poly-ADP-ribosylation. The relationship between histone acetylation and gene expression was first observed in 1964. Since then, a great deal of evidence has accumulated showing that not only transcription but other DNA-mediated reactions also are regulated by histone acetylation. With regard to the putative mechanism(s) by which histone acetylation regulates the flow of genetic information, site-specific modification and recognition of acetylated histone/DNA complexes have been postulated. Elucidation of the downstream effects of histone modification, as well as the identification, isolation and characterization of the relevant factors involved, have aided in our understanding of the mechanisms of regulation of DNA activity by histones. Currently, state-of-the-art technologies that enable genome-wida analysis are allowing insight into a critical and interesting question in eukaryotic transcription: are the principles that govern transcription of individual gene loci applicable to the genome as a whole? Here, we review the recent progress on histone modifications, with an emphasis on the role of histone acetylation in gene expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Jun dimerization protein-2 (JDP2) is a component of the AP-1 transcription factor that represses transactivation mediated by the Jun family of proteins. Here, we examine the functional mechanisms of JDP2 and show that it can inhibit p300-mediated acetylation of core histones in vitro and in vivo. Inhibition of histone acetylation requires the N-terminal 35 residues and the DNA-binding region of JDP2. In addition, we demonstrate that JDP2 has histone-chaperone activity in vitro. These results suggest that the sequence-specific DNA-binding protein JDP2 may control transcription via direct regulation of the modification of histones and the assembly of chromatin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Post-translational modification of histones, a major protein component of eukaryotic chromosomes, contributes to the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Distinct patterns of histone modification are observed at specific chromosomal regions and affect various reactions on chromosomes (transcription, replication, repair, and recombination). Histone modification has long been proposed to have a profound effect on eukaryotic gene expression since its discovery in 1964. Verification of this idea, however, was difficult until the identification of enzymes responsible for histone modifications. Ten years ago (1995), histone acetyltransferases (HATs), which acetylate lysine residues in histone amino-terminal tail regions, were isolated. HATs are involved in the regulation of both promoter-specific transcription and long-range/chromosome-wide transcription. Analyses of HATs and other modification enzymes have revealed mechanisms of epigenetic regulation that are mediated by post-translational modifications of histones. Here we review some major advances in the field, with emphasis on the lysine specificity of the acetylation reaction and on the regulation of gene expression over broad regions. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Chromosomes are partitioned into distinct functional regions. For example, heterochromatin regions consist of condensed chromatin and contain few transcriptionally active genes, whereas euchromatin regions are less condensed and majority of active genes reside in the euchromatin regions. Because distinct regions reside in each chromosome, borders are accordingly established between these regions. A prevailing view of the borders is that they are ‘walls’ that actively inhibit communication between distinct regions on chromosomes. Although little is known about the molecular bases of these walls, specific DNA elements are considered to recruit these walls to define the positions of the borders. We call the borders established with this mechanism as ‘fixed borders’. Past studies have identified various insulators (boundary DNA elements) that have been suggested to recruit fixed borders to them. Another mechanism, which we introduce and focus on in this review, does not require walls recruited by specific DNA elements at the chromosomal borders. Instead, the borders are defined by a balance of opposing enzymatic activities located at the opposite sides of the resultant borders. We name these borders ‘negotiable borders’. Here we review some of the recent progress in the field that offer valuable insight into mechanisms of establishing structural and functional borders on chromosomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a novel chromatin-modulating factor, nuclear FK506-binding protein (FKBP). It is a member of the peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPIase) family, whose members were originally identified as enzymes that assist in the proper folding of polypeptides. The endogenous FKBP gene is required for the in vivo silencing of gene expression at the rDNA locus and FKBP has histone chaperone activity in vitro. Both of these properties depend on the N-terminal non-PPIase domain of the protein. The C-terminal PPIase domain is not essential for the histone chaperone activity in vitro, but it regulates rDNA silencing in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation showed that nuclear FKBP associates with chromatin at rDNA loci in vivo. These in vivo and in vitro findings in nuclear FKBPs reveal a hitherto unsuspected link between PPIases and the alteration of chromatin structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Characterizes the human CIA/hASF1 as an interactor of tandem bromodomain modules of human (h)TAF[sub II]145 associated with transcription initiation factor IID (TFIID) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Role of TFIID on transcription initiation of chromatin templates; Linkage between TFIID and histone chaperon; Use of Western immunoblot analysis.

Background Transcriptional initiation of class II genes is one of the major targets for the regulation of gene expression and is carried out by RNA polymerase II and many auxiliary factors, which include general transcription initiation factors (GTFs). TFIIE, one of the GTFs, functions at the later stage of transcription initiation. As recent studies indicated the possibility that TFIIE may have a role in chromatin transcriptional regulation, we isolated TFIIE-interacting factors which have chromatin-related functions. Results Using the yeast two-hybrid screening system, we isolated the C-terminal part of the human homologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (y) Spt16p/Cdc68p, a general chromatin factor. The C-terminal part of human SPT16/CDC68 directly interacts with TFIIE, and ySpt16p/Cdc68p also interacts with yTFIIE (Tfa1p/Tfa2p), thus indicating the existence of an evolutionarily conserved interaction between TFIIE and SPT16/CDC68. Functional interaction of yTFIIE and ySpt16p/Cdc68p was examined using a conditional yTFIIE-α mutant strain. Over-expression of ySpt16p/Cdc68p suppressed the phenotype of cold sensitivity of the yTFIIE-α-cs mutant strain, and in vitro binding assays revealed that yTFIIE-α-cs mutant protein showed diminished binding affinity to ySpt16p/Cdc68p. Conclusions These observations indicate that general transcription initiation factor TFIIE functionally interacts with general chromatin factor SPT16/CDC68, a finding which provides new insight into the involvement of TFIIE in chromatin transcription. This may well lead to a breakthrough in relationships between the transcription initiation process and structural changes in chromatin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Structural changes in chromatin play essential roles in regulating eukaryotic gene expression. Silencing, potent repression of transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, occurs near telomeres and at the silent mating-type loci, as well as at rDNA loci. This type of repression relates to the condensation of chromatin that occurs in the heterochromatin of multicellular organisms. Anti-silencing is a reaction by which silenced loci are de-repressed. Genetic studies revealed that several factors participate in the anti-silencing reaction. However, actions of factors and molecular mechanisms underlying anti-silencing remain unknown. Results: Here we report the functional activity of a highly evolutionarily conserved human factor termed CIA (CCG1-interacting factor A), whose budding yeast homologue ASF1 has anti-silencing activity. Using yeast two-hybrid screening, we isolated histone H3 as an interacting factor of CIA. We also showed that CIA binds to histones H3/H4 in vitro, and that the interacting region of histone H3 is located in the C-terminal helices. Considering the functional role of CIA as a histone-interacting protein, we found that CIA forms a nucleosome-like structure with DNA and histones. Conclusions: These results show that human CIA, whose yeast homologue ASF1 is an anti-silencing factor, possesses histone chaperone activity. This leads to a better understanding of the relationship between chromatin structural changes and anti-silencing processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The TATA box-binding factor TFIID mediates transcriptional regulation through interactions with various regulatory factors and putative participation in reconfiguration of nucleosomes, utilizing its components, which include TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-associated factors (TAFs). Our and other previous studies have elucidated that there exist histone-similar TAFs. Studies on TAFs similar to histone H3 and H4 have revealed their biochemical and structural similarities to the corresponding histones. However, the existence of histone-like interactions involving the other TAFs is still ambiguous. Here we report the analyses with a two-hybrid system of the mutually interacting regions between hTAF1180 and hTAF1122, which resemble histone H4 and H2B, respectively. The results demonstrate the indispensability of the histone fold motifs of these two TAFs for mutual interaction. Together with earlier biochemical or structural studies, the present results suggest the presence of a histone octamer-like partial TAF complex and its involvement in transcription from chromatin templates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The BET (bromodomains and extra terminal domain) family proteins recognize acetylated chromatin through their bromodomain and act as transcriptional activators. One of the BET proteins, BRD2, associates with the transcription factor E2F, the mediator components CDK8 and TRAP220, and RNA polymerase II, as well as with acetylated chromatin during mitosis. BRD2 contains two bromodomains (BD1 and BD2), which are considered to be responsible for binding to acetylated chromatin. The BRD2 protein specifically recognizes the histone H4 tail acetylated at Lys12. Here, we report the crystal structure of the N-terminal bromodomain (BD1, residues 74–194) of human BRD2. Strikingly, the BRD2 BD1 protein forms an intact dimer in the crystal. This is the first observation of a homodimer among the known bromodomain structures, through the buried hydrophobic core region at the interface. Biochemical studies also demonstrated BRD2 BD1 dimer formation in solution. The two acetyllysine-binding pockets and a negatively charged secondary binding pocket, produced at the dimer interface in BRD2 BD1, may be the unique features that allow BRD2 BD1 to selectively bind to the acetylated H4 tail. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The general transcription initiation factor TFIID and its interactors play critical roles in regulating the transcription from both naked and chromatin DNA. We have isolated a novel TFIID interactor that we denoted as CCG1/TAFII250-interacting factor B(CIB). We show here that CIB activates transcription. To further understand the function of this protein, we determined its crystal structure at 2.2-Å resolution. The tertiary structure of CIB reveals an α/β-hydrolase fold that resembles structures in the prokaryotic α/β-hydrolase family proteins. It is not similar in structure or primary sequence to any eukaryotic transcription or chromatin factors that have been reported to date. CIB possesses a conserved catalytic triad that is found in other α/β-hydrolases, and our in vitro studies confirmed that it bears hydrolase activity. However, CIB differs from other α/β-hydrolases in that it lacks a binding site excursion, which facilitates the substrate selectivity of the other α/β-hydrolases. Further functional characterization of CIB based on its tertiary structure and through biochemical studies may provide novel insights into the mechanisms that regulate eukaryotic transcription. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]