Search

Background and Aims Dogroses (Rosa sect. Caninae) are mostly pentaploid, bearing 2 n  = 5 x  = 35 chromosomes in somatic cells. They evolved a unique form of asymmetrical meiosis characterized by two types of chromosomes: (1) chromosomes forming bivalents and distributed in the normal sexual way; and (2) chromosomes occurring as univalents and transferred by a female gamete only. In the mature pollen of pentaploid species, seven bivalent-derived chromosomes are transmitted to offspring, and 21 unpaired univalent chromosomes are eliminated during microsporogenesis. To discriminate between bivalent- and univalent-forming chromosomes, we studied histone H3 phosphorylation patterns regulating meiotic chromosome condensation and segregation. Methods We analysed histone modification patterns during male canina meiosis in two representative dogrose species, 5 x Rosa canina and 5 x Rosa rubiginosa , by immunohistochemical and molecular cytogenetics approaches. Immunostaining of meiotic cells included α-tubulin, histone H3 phosphorylation (H3S10p, H3S28p and H3T3p) and methylation (H3K4me3 and H3K27me3) marks. In addition, fluorescent in situ hybridization was carried out with an 18S rDNA probe. Key Results In the first meiotic division, univalent chromosomes underwent equational division into chromatids, while homologues in bivalents were segregated as regular dyads. In diakinesis, bivalent chromosomes displayed strong H3 phosphorylation signals in proximal regions, spreading to the rest of the chromosome. In contrast, in univalents, the H3 phosphorylation signals were weaker, occurring mostly outside proximal regions largely overlapping with the H3K4me3 signals. Reduced phosphorylation was associated with relative under-condensation of the univalent chromosomes, particularly at early diakinesis. Conclusions We hypothesize that the absence of pairing and/or recombination in univalent chromosomes negatively affects the histone H3 phosphorylation of their chromatin and perhaps the loading of meiotic-specific cohesins. This apparently destabilizes cohesion of sister chromatids, leading to their premature split in the first meiotic division. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stimulation of the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathway results in a multitude of events including expression of the immediate-early genes, c-fos and c-myc. Downstream targets of this stimulated pathway are the mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinases (MSK) 1 and 2, which are histone H3 kinases. In chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, it has been shown that the mitogen-induced phosphorylated H3 is associated with the immediate-early genes and that MSK1/2 activity and H3 phosphorylation have roles in chromatin remodeling and transcription of these genes. In oncogene-transformed fibroblasts in which the Ras-MAPK pathway is constitutively active, histone H1 and H3 phosphorylation is increased and the chromatin of these cells has a more relaxed structure than the parental cells. In this review we explore the deregulation of the Ras-MAPK pathway in cancer, with an emphasis on breast cancer. We discuss the features of MSK1 and 2 and the impact of a constitutively activated Ras-MAPK pathway on chromatin remodeling and gene expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-resolution detection of phosphorylated histone H3 at serine 10 in mitotic barley chromosomes for scanning electron microscopy was shown using a novel application of indirect immunogold labeling with Nanogold. This method permits localization and quantification of signals in a three-dimensional context. Because the chromosome structure is well preserved, characterization of binding sites (chromomeres, parallel matrix fibers, solenoids), currently in the realm of nanometer decades, is possible. Quantification and three-dimensional localization of labels is possible with stereoscopic analysis. Limitations of the method pertain to the challenges in preservation of chromosome ultrastructure, accessibility of immunoreactants into the fixed chromatin and unspecific labeling. The differences between silver and gold enhancement and the current status of labeling efficiency are addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]