Search

While direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) cure chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in almost all patients, some patients remain at risk of liver disease despite HCV cure. In order to identify risk factors indicating liver‐related morbidity and death after viral cure, we included 6982 patients from the national multicenter real‐world German Hepatitis C Registry with regular follow‐up visits for up to 7 years after DAA therapy. Definitions for normal liver function tests (in women/men) were alanine aminotransferase (ALT; ≤35/≤50 U/L), ALT according to American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD; ≤19/≤30 U/L), and gamma‐glutamyltransferase (GGT; ≤40/≤60 U/L). In our cohort, 97.4% of patients achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). At 24 weeks after SVR (SVR24), elevated ALT occurred in 657/6982 (9.4%), elevated ALT (AASLD) in 2609/6982 (37.4%), and elevated GGT in 1777/6982 (25.5%) patients. Risk factors for increased ALT at SVR24 were obesity, alcohol, cirrhosis, elevated baseline ALT, and non‐SVR. Increased GGT at SVR24 was significantly (p < 0.05) and independently associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.12), higher body mass index (OR, 1.04), age >50 years (OR, 1.60), liver cirrhosis (OR, 3.97), alcohol consumption (OR, 2.99), diabetes (OR, 1.63), non‐SVR (OR, 8.00), and elevated GGT at baseline (OR, 17.12). In multivariate regression analysis, elevated GGT at SVR24, particularly in combination with cirrhosis, was the best predictor for hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma development, and death, followed by elevated ALT (AASLD) and standard ALT, which predicted hepatic decompensation. Despite successful HCV therapy, elevated GGT at SVR24 and to a lesser extent ALT are predictive of the future clinical outcome and linked with liver‐associated comorbidities. This may highlight the relevance of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes mellitus, alcohol, and cirrhosis for the clinical outcome in a vulnerable population, even after HCV cure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: advanced liver disease; HCV; HIV coinfection; late presentation; viral hepatitis EN advanced liver disease HCV HIV coinfection late presentation viral hepatitis 1660 1664 5 10/19/21 20211101 NES 211101 Abbreviations ALT Alanine-aminotransferase APRI Aspartate-aminotransferase-to-platelet-ratio-index ART Antiretroviral therapy BMI Body mass index DAA Direct acting antiviral DHC-R German Hepatitis C-Registry GECCO German Hepatitis C Cohort GT Genotype HBV Hepatitis B virus HCC Hepatocellular carcinoma HCV Hepatitis C virus HIV Human immunodeficiency virus IVDA intravenous drug abuse LP Late presentation for viral hepatitis MSM Men who have sex with men OST Opioid substitution therapy PrEP Pre-Exposure prophylaxis RNA Ribonucleic acid SVR Sustained virological response WHO World Health Organization INTRODUCTION Chronic liver disease due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major public health burden with an estimated 71 million people worldwide suffering from replicative HCV infection.1 Even if diagnosed in an early stage of disease, missing linkage to care or reluctance to treat might defer treatment until progression to an advanced stage of liver disease. Has increased rollout of direct acting antiviral therapy decreased the burden of late presentation and advanced liver disease in patients starting hepatitis C virus therapy in Germany? We aimed to investigate the extent of LP since unrestricted access to DAA therapy in Germany for HCV monoinfected and HIV/HCV coinfected patients in the period 2014-2018. Treatment uptake was about 3 times higher in 2015 compared to 2014 (1100 patients vs. 3055 patients), which reflects most likely the effect of the implementation of DAAs for HCV treatment and unrestricted access in Germany. [Extracted from the article]

The number of patients diagnosed with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is markedly higher than the number initiating treatment indicating gaps in the care cascade, likely centred around reaching at‐risk populations. Understanding changing characteristics of patients with HCV allows for targeted programs that increase linkage to care. We investigated changes in demographic and clinical characteristics of patients registered in the German Hepatitis C‐Registry (DHC‐R) from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019. The DHC‐R is an ongoing, noninterventional, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort registry including 327 German centres. Patient characteristics were analysed over time in 7 phases for all patients completing a screening visit. Overall, 14,357 patients were enrolled. The percentage of treatment‐naïve/non‐cirrhotic patients increased from 34.4% in phase 1 (1 January–31 December 2014) to 68.2% in phase 7 (1 August–31 December 2019). The proportion of migrants, alcohol users, people who inject drugs, and those receiving opiate substitution therapy increased in later registry phases. Most patients (60.1%) were receiving comedication at baseline. The most prescribed comedications were drugs used to treat opioid dependence which increased from 9.2% in phase 1 to 24.0% in phase 7. The patients' mean age decreased from 52.3 years in phase 1 to 48.7 years in phase 7. From 2014 to 2019, the proportion of at‐risk patients enrolling in the registry increased. To eliminate viral hepatitis as a major public health threat, a continued commitment to engaging underserved populations into the HCV care cascade is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the availability of highly effective and well-tolerated direct-acting antivirals, not all patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection receive treatment. This retrospective, multi-centre, noninterventional, case-control study identified patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection initiating (control) or not initiating (case) treatment at 43 sites in Germany from September 2017 to June 2018. It aimed to compare characteristics of the two patient populations and to identify factors involved in patient/physician decision to initiate/not initiate chronic hepatitis C virus treatment, with a particular focus on historical barriers. Overall, 793 patients were identified: 573 (72%) who received treatment and 220 (28%) who did not. In 42% of patients, the reason for not initiating treatment was patient wish, particularly due to fear of treatment (17%) or adverse events (13%). Other frequently observed reasons for not initiating treatment were in accordance with known historical barriers for physicians to initiate therapy, including perceived or expected lack of compliance (14.5%), high patient age (10.9%), comorbidities (15.0%), alcohol abuse (9.1%), hard drug use (7.7%), and opioid substitution therapy (4.5%). Patient wish against therapy was also a frequently reported reason for not initiating treatment in the postponed (35.2%) and not planned (47.0%) subgroups; of note, known historical factors were also common reasons for postponing treatment. Real-world and clinical trial evidence is accumulating, which suggests that such historical barriers do not negatively impact treatment effectiveness. Improved education is key to facilitate progress towards the World Health Organization target of eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: The presence of baseline resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) reduced sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1a infected patients treated with Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (EBR/GZR). This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of NS5A RASs and treatment outcomes in patients for whom EBR/GZR was intended. Methods: We sequenced NS5A in 832 samples from German genotype1a‐infected DAA‐naïve patients population‐based, which were collected in the European Resistance Database. Treatment outcomes and clinical parameters were evaluated in 519 of such patients retrospectively. Results: Overall, 6.5% of patients harboured EBR‐specific NS5A RASs at baseline, including Q30H/R (3.3%), L31M (1.8%), Y93H (1.6%) and other individual variants. Antiviral treatment, including EBR/GZR, was initiated in 88% of the patients. In the absence of RASs, the majority of patients received EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (57%) and the SVR rate was 97% compared to 99% SVR achieved using other DAA regimens (LDV/SOF ± RBV, G/P, PrOD + RBV, VEL/SOF). Various regimens were used in the presence of RASs and SVR rates were high following treatment with LDV/SOF (100%), G/P (83%), PrOD/RBV (100%), VEL/SOF (100%), SMV/SOF (100%) and EBR/GZR + RBV for 16 weeks (100%). However, two patients received EBR/GZR for 16 weeks without RBV and one relapsed. Conclusions: EBR/GZR treatment with or without RBV for 12 or 16 weeks according to a baseline RAS analysis was highly effective with ≥97% SVR in patients with genotype 1a. EBR/GZR without RBV should be avoided in patients with RASs. High SVR rates were also achieved using other 8‐ or 12‐week DAA regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on the prevalence of resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) and their implications for treatment with direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) are sparse in European patients with HCV genotype 4. This study investigated RASs before and after DAA failure in different genotype 4 subtypes and evaluated retreatment efficacies. Samples of 195 genotype 4‐infected patients were collected in the European Resistance Database and investigated for NS3, NS5A and NS5B RASs. Retreatment efficacies in DAA failure patients were analysed retrospectively. After NS5A inhibitor (NS5Ai) failure, subtype 4r was frequent (30%) compared to DAA‐naïve patients (5%) and the number of NS5A RASs was significantly higher in subtype 4r compared to 4a or 4d (median three RASs vs no or one RAS, respectively, P <.0001). RASsL28V, L30R and M31L pre‐existed in subtype 4r and were maintained after NS5Ai failure. Typical subtype 4r RASs were located in subdomain 1a of NS5A, close to membrane interaction and protein‐protein interaction sites that are responsible for multimerization and hence viral replication. Retreatment of 37 DAA failure patients was highly effective with 100% SVR in prior SOF/RBV, PI/SOF and PI/NS5Ai failures. Secondary virologic failures were rare (n = 2; subtype 4d and 4r) and only observed in prior NS5Ai/SOF failures (SVR 90%). In conclusion, subtype 4r harboured considerably more RASs compared to other subtypes. A resistance‐tailored retreatment using first‐ and second‐generation DAAs was highly effective with SVR rates ≥90% across all subtypes and first‐line treatment regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Liver function tests (alanine aminotransferase, ALT; gamma‐glutamyltransferase, GGT) not always normalize after elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) by direct acting antivirals (DAAs), possibly indicating concomitant non‐viral liver diseases. We analysed factors determining the biochemical response (normalized ALT/GGT) of DAA therapy in a large real‐world cohort. Method: The German Hepatitis C‐Registry is a national multicenter registry study. Normal ALT was defined ≤35 U/L (female) and ≤50 U/L (male) or, according to AASLD, ≤19 U/L (female) and ≤30 U/L (male), normal GGT ≤40 U/L (female) and ≤60 U/L (male). Results: At baseline, ALT was elevated in 3705/4946 (74.9%), ALT (AASLD) in 4669/4946 (94.4%) and GGT in 3018/4906 (61.5%). In this study, 97% of patients achieved SVR12. At week 12 after end of therapy, ALT was elevated in 451/4946 (9.1%), ALT according to AASLD in 1906/4946 (38.5%) and GGT in 863/4879 (17.7%). Persistently elevated ALT after DAA therapy was independently associated with high body mass index (BMI), age <70 years, liver cirrhosis, diabetes, alcohol consumption and not achieving SVR12. Using the stricter AASLD criteria, opioid substitution and male sex were additional predictors. Higher GGT at week 12 was associated with high BMI, age >70 years, liver cirrhosis, diabetes, alcohol consumption, opioid substitution and non‐SVR. Importantly, persistently elevated liver tests after treatment, particularly GGT, were associated with hepatic decompensation and mortality during 4‐years follow‐up. Conclusion: Risk factors at baseline (obesity, diabetes, liver cirrhosis, alcohol consumption) are independently associated with persistently elevated liver function tests after SVR, indicating that these patients warrant further hepatological follow‐up. Clinical trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; ID DRKS00009717). See Editorial on Page 509 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir ± ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV) regimens show high efficacy and good tolerability in clinical trials for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (GT) 1 or 4. To evaluate whether these results translate to clinical practice, data were pooled from observational studies across 13 countries. Treatment‐naïve or ‐experienced patients, with or without cirrhosis, received OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV according to approved local labels and clinical practice. Sustained virologic response at post‐treatment Week 12 (SVR12), adverse events (AEs) and comedication management were assessed for patients initiating treatment before 1 June 2017. The safety population included 3850 patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug. The core population (N = 3808) further excluded patients with unknown GT or cirrhosis status, or who received off‐label treatment. Patients had HCV GT1a (n = 732; 19%), GT1b (n = 2619; 69%) or GT4 (n = 457; 12%). In 3546 patients with sufficient follow‐up data at post‐treatment Week 12, the SVR12 rate was 96% (n/N = 3401/3546 [95% CI 95.2‐96.5]). In patients with or without cirrhosis, SVR12 was comparable (96%). In patients with HCV GT1a, GT1b or GT4, SVR12 rates were 93%, 97% and 94%. In GT1b‐infected patients with planned treatment for 8 weeks, SVR12 was 96%. In patients with ≥1 comorbidity (67%), SVR12 was 95%. 58% of patients received ≥1 comedication, and there was minimal impact on SVR12 rates using comedications for peptic ulcers and gastro‐esophageal reflux disease, statins, antipsychotics or antiepileptics. Most comedications were maintained during treatment although 58% of patients changed their statin medication. AEs and serious AEs occurred in 26% and 3% of patients. Post‐baseline Grade 3‐4 laboratory abnormalities were rare (<3%), and discontinuation rates were low (<4%). Real‐world evidence confirms the effectiveness of OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV in patients with HCV GT1 or GT4, regardless of common comorbidities or comedications, and is consistent with clinical trial results. Adverse safety outcomes may be limited by underreporting in the real‐world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evidence based clinical guidelines are implemented to treat patients efficiently that include efficacy, tolerability but also health economic considerations. This is of particular relevance to the new direct acting antiviral agents that have revolutionized treatment of chronic hepatitis C. For hepatitis C genotypes 2/3 interferon free treatment is already available with sofosbuvir plus ribavirin. However, treatment with sofosbuvir-based regimens is 10–20 times more expensive compared to pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV). It has to be discussed if PegIFN/RBV is still an option for easy to treat patients. We assessed the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotypes 2/3 with PegIFN/RBV in a real world setting according to the latest German guidelines. Overall, 1006 patients were recruited into a prospective patient registry with 959 having started treatment. The intention-to-treat analysis showed poor SVR (GT2 61%, GT3 47%) while patients with adherence had excellent SVR in the per protocol analysis (GT2 96%, GT3 90%). According to guidelines, 283 patients were candidates for shorter treatment duration, namely a treatment of 16 weeks (baseline HCV-RNA <800.000 IU/mL, no cirrhosis and RVR). However, 65% of these easy to treat patients have been treated longer than recommended that resulted in higher costs but not higher SVR rates. In conclusion, treatment with PegIFN/RBV in a real world setting can be highly effective yet similar effective than PegIFN± sofosbuvir/RBV in well-selected naïve G2/3 patients. Full adherence to guidelines could be further improved, because it would be important in the new era with DAA, especially to safe resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The importance of alcohol and cannabis consumption for the effectiveness of treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with direct acting antivirals (DAAs) in people on opioid substitution therapy (OST) has not been investigated in detail. Methods: We investigated sustained virological response (SVR) rates and proportion of lost to follow-up (LTFU) between OST (n = 739) and non-OST patients (n = 7008) in the German Hepatitis C-Registry (Deutsches Hepatitis C-Register, DHC-R), which is a national multicenter prospective non-interventional real-world registry. Non-OST patients comprised patients with former/current drug use (non-OST/DU; n = 1500) and patients never consuming drugs (non-OST/NDU; n = 5508). Findings: SVR 12/24 rates (intention to treat [ITT]) in patients consuming no or less than 30 g/day (women) or 40 g/day (men) were significantly higher in non-OST/NDU (range 91%-92%) vs OST patients (range 83%-86%), mainly due to significantly higher LTFU rates in OST (range 11%-12%) compared with non-OST/NDU (range 2%-3%). In non-OST/NDU with high alcohol consumption of more than 30/40 g/day, SVR 12/24 rates (ITT) were lower (85%) but did not differ to OST (85%) with high alcohol consumption. No significant differences could be seen for SVR 12/24 in per-protocol (PP) analysis independent of alcohol consumption or amount of alcohol intake. Cannabis use did not significantly influence SVR 12/24 in ITT or PP or LTFU. Conclusions: High SVR rates could be achieved in both OST and non-OST patients irrespective of alcohol or cannabis consumption. However, LTFU is more likely in patients with current or former drug use than in patients without drug history and in patients with high alcohol consumption but occurred mainly after end of antiviral treatment (EOT), leaving a high chance for HCV elimination in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytokine treatment with Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) represents a clinical model of immune associated depression, but it remains unclear if it is of the same entity as major depressive disorder (MDD). The study focuses on possible gender differences in IFN-α induced depression and effects of a pre-emptive antidepressant treatment.Methods: Data from 181 patients with chronic hepatitis C infection (cHC) without history of mental illnesses undergoing treatment with IFN-α 2a and ribavirin were re-analyzed for gender effects. Patients with a pre-emptive antidepressant therapy with Escitalopram (n = 90, verum group) to prevent IFN-induced depression were compared to patients who received placebo (n = 91). Depressive symptoms before and during HCV-treatment were assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale.Results: We found significant differences regarding the incidence and severity of depressive symptoms between men and women for patients without antidepressant pre-treatment (placebo group). Significantly more women without pre-emptive antidepressant therapy suffered from clinically relevant depression (MADRS values ≥ 13, p = 0.041) and self-rated depressive symptoms (BDI ≥ 17, p = 0.024). Antidepressant pre-treatment showed comparable effects regarding the reduction of incidence and severity of depression in both women and men.Conclusions: Compared to MDD, IFN-alpha-induced depression in patients with cHC is also characterized by gender differences with an increased risk for women but no gender difference regarding the effects of an antidepressant pre-treatment is found. Our data strengthens the hypothesis that Interferon-induced depression serves as a clinical model for immune related depressive disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]