Search

Background Methods Results Conclusion The inability of topical medications to reach sinus cavities is a potential reason for lack of efficacy in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). One purpose of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is to enable delivery of medications into the sinus cavities. The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS‐FLU; XHANCE) creates unique biomechanics that enable deposition of intranasal corticosteroid into sinuses and sinus drainage pathways but may have differing efficacy in operated versus unoperated sinuses. Two 24‐week randomized trials (ReOpen1/2) evaluated EDS‐FLU versus EDS‐placebo in patients with CRS, stratified by surgical status.Surgery‐naive (n = 332) and prior‐surgery (n = 215) patient groups were analyzed as pooled data from ReOpen1/2. Outcome measures (least‐squares mean change from baseline) included combined symptom score (CSS) and congestion score at weeks 4, 8, and 12 and average of percentages of opacified volume (APOV) of ethmoid/maxillary sinuses on CT and Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT‐22) total score at week 24.Baseline scores suggested moderate–severe disease: mean CSS = 5.8; APOV = 67.2%. EDS‐FLU produced significant improvement versus placebo (p < 0.05): CSS (surgery‐naive, −0.68 vs. −1.42; prior ESS, −0.70 vs. −1.87); congestion (surgery‐naive, −0.24 vs. −0.59; prior ESS, −0.24 vs. −0.69); and SNOT‐22 (surgery‐naive, −7.56 vs. −18.30; prior ESS, −10.72 vs. −18.74). Similar results were observed for APOV (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between surgery subgroups with either EDS‐FLU dose.EDS‐FLU improved symptoms, sinus opacification, and quality of life in patients with CRS with or without prior ESS, suggesting a role for EDS‐FLU in both populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We tracked patient SNOT-22 and ACT scores at the following time-points: post-FESS/pre-desensitization; 1 to 3 months post-desensitization; 4 to 6 months post-desensitization; 7 to 12 months post-desensitization; and 13 to 24 months post-desensitization. Values for age, daily prednisone dose, and pre-desensitization SNOT-22 were recorded after FESS and before aspirin treatment after aspirin desensitization. Keywords: chronic rhinosinusitis; endoscopic sinus surgery; eosinophilic rhinitis and nasal polyposis; FESS; SNOT-22 EN chronic rhinosinusitis endoscopic sinus surgery eosinophilic rhinitis and nasal polyposis FESS SNOT-22 872 875 4 05/17/22 20220601 NES 220601 Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by the triad of eosinophilic asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, and a non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.1 The "gold standard" treatment of AERD consists of debulking of nasal polyps via complete functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) of all 8 sinuses followed by aspirin treatment after aspirin desensitization (ATAD).2 The treatment protocol has been shown to lead to improved score on the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), decreased overall corticosteroid use, lower rate of revision surgery, and improved control of asthma.3,4 In this study, we seek to compare the outcomes of ATAD between men and women with AERD. [Extracted from the article]

Background Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) is commonly isolated from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, the role of CoNS in CRS remains controversial. We aimed to determine the association between positive CoNS culture at functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and CRS severity. Methods Adult CRS patients who underwent FESS between October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011 were recruited. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, medication use, Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) scores, and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores were collected at baseline before FESS. Intraoperative cultures were obtained in a standard manner. Patients were placed into 2 groups based on culture findings: patients with CoNS as the sole positive culture result and patients with all other positive culture results, including CoNS, as part of a polymicrobial culture. Results A total of 376 CRS patients met the criteria; 106 patients (28%) had CoNS as their only isolate, 260 (69%) had other positive cultures, and 10 (3%) had no bacterial growth. Compared to patients with other positive cultures, patients with the sole result of CoNS were significantly less likely to have a history of FESS (52% vs 65%, p = 0.019), nasal polyps (50% vs 65%, p = 0.006), and had a better Lund-Mackay CT score (11.95 vs 14.18, p = 0.020). After adjusting for all factors in the multiple logistic regression model, CoNS as the sole positive culture result was independently associated with having no history of FESS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22 to 0.94; p = 0.034). Conclusion Positive intraoperative CoNS cultures alone do not result in increased CRS disease burden by objective or subjective measures as compared to patients with other bacterial or polymicrobial culture isolates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]