Search

Background: The delivery of topical intranasal corticosteroid sprays has traditionally been the primary method of treating recurrent nasal polyposis. An emerging treatment for polyposis is budesonide nasal irrigations. Delivered at concentrations nearly 100 times greater than found in prescription nasal sprays, there have been little studies on the effects of budesonide irrigation on the adrenal axis. Therefore, we investigated whether irrigation with budesonide solution was associated with any increase in serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol levels. Methods: Patients who previously had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery and were not taking prednisone for 3 months were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients irrigated twice daily with 0.5 mg/2 mL of budesonide mixed with 240 mL of saline solution. Serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol were collected before drug administration and 6 weeks after continuous use. Results: Ten patients completed this study. The average serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol before drug administration were 9.8 ± 5.4 μg/dL and 28.1 ± 15.1 μg/24 hours, respectively. After 6-week follow-up, the average serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol were 12.8 ± 3.5 μg/dL and 16.5 ± 5.6 μg/24 hours, respectively. Normal ranges for serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol are 5-25 μg/dL and 4-50 μg/24 hours, respectively. Conclusions: Irrigation with budesonide, 0.5 mg/2 mL, in 250 mL of saline solution does not result in decreases of serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol levels. Based on this, we feel irrigation with budesonide solution is safe to perform in patients as an alternative to traditional aerosolized steroid sprays or systemic corticosteroids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We tracked patient SNOT-22 and ACT scores at the following time-points: post-FESS/pre-desensitization; 1 to 3 months post-desensitization; 4 to 6 months post-desensitization; 7 to 12 months post-desensitization; and 13 to 24 months post-desensitization. Values for age, daily prednisone dose, and pre-desensitization SNOT-22 were recorded after FESS and before aspirin treatment after aspirin desensitization. Keywords: chronic rhinosinusitis; endoscopic sinus surgery; eosinophilic rhinitis and nasal polyposis; FESS; SNOT-22 EN chronic rhinosinusitis endoscopic sinus surgery eosinophilic rhinitis and nasal polyposis FESS SNOT-22 872 875 4 05/17/22 20220601 NES 220601 Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by the triad of eosinophilic asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, and a non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.1 The "gold standard" treatment of AERD consists of debulking of nasal polyps via complete functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) of all 8 sinuses followed by aspirin treatment after aspirin desensitization (ATAD).2 The treatment protocol has been shown to lead to improved score on the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), decreased overall corticosteroid use, lower rate of revision surgery, and improved control of asthma.3,4 In this study, we seek to compare the outcomes of ATAD between men and women with AERD. [Extracted from the article]

Background Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are common culture isolates in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). We aimed to determine whether they were associated with different clinical factors of CRS. Methods Adult CRS patients who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) between October 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011 were recruited. Patient demographics, Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) scores, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores, disease characteristics, and medication use were collected prior to FESS. Intraoperative culture was obtained in a standard manner. We compared patients with isolates of S. aureus or P. aeruginosa to patients with other culture results and no bacterial growth, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was performed. Results A total of 376 patients met criteria; 104 patients (28%) had S. aureus, 32 (9%) had P. aeruginosa, and 10 patients (3%) had no bacterial growth. After adjusting for all clinical factors, compared to patients with positive culture other than S. aureus, patients with S. aureus had 1.9 times increased odds of having nasal polyps (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 3.3; p = 0.036); when compared to patients with positive culture other than P. aeruginosa, patients with P. aeruginosa had 7.8 times increased odds of having prior FESS (OR = 7.8; 95% CI, 2.1 to 28.9; p = 0.002) (91% vs 58%; p < 0.001) and 3.6 times increased odds of having diabetes with marginal significance (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 1.0 to 13.2; p = 0.053). The sample size in the no bacterial growth group was too small to draw firm conclusions. Conclusion S. aureus was more common in CRS patients with nasal polyps, whereas P. aeruginosa was more common in CRS patients with prior FESS history and possibly diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]