Search

Purpose: Doxorubicin and cisplatin have activity in endometrial carcinoma and at initiation of this study ranked as the most active agents. This trial of stage III, IV, or recurrent disease evaluated whether combining these agents increases response rate (RR) and prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over doxorubicin alone., Patients and Methods: Of 299 patients registered, 281 (94%) were eligible. Regimens were doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 500 mg/m(2) doxorubicin., Results: There were 12 (8%) complete (CR) and 26 (17%) partial responses (PR) among 150 patients receiving doxorubicin versus 25 (19%) CRs and 30 (23%) PRs among patients receiving the combination. The overall response rate was higher among patients receiving the combination (42%) compared with patients receiving doxorubicin (25%; P =.004). Median PFS was 5.7 and 3.8 months, respectively, for the combination and single agent. The PFS hazard ratio was 0.736 (95% CI, 0.577 to 0.939; P =.014). Median OS was 9.0 and 9.2 months, respectively, for the combination and single agent. Overall death rates were similar in the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.928; 95% CI, 0.727 to 1.185). Nausea, vomiting, and hematologic toxicities were common. The combination produced more grade 3 to 4 leukopenia (62% v 40%), thrombocytopenia (14% v 2%), anemia (22% v 4%), and nausea/vomiting (13% v 3%)., Conclusion: Adding cisplatin to doxorubicin in advanced endometrial carcinoma improves RR and PFS with a negligible impact on OS and produces increased toxicity. These results have served as a building block for subsequent phase III trials in patients with disseminated and high-risk limited endometrial carcinoma.

Individual cancer patients differ in their nausea/vomiting response to chemotherapy. It is not known why patients receiving the same chemotherapy have different severity of side effects. Several lines of research implicate the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in the development of chemotherapy-induced nausea. We examined the association between autonomic reactivity and the level of nausea experienced following chemotherapy in 20 patients with ovarian cancer treated with cisplatin or carboplatin who received the same antiemetic. We applied eight common non-invasive clinical tests of autonomic function prior to inpatient chemotherapy treatment, 2 h after treatment and again 24 h following treatment. Two hours after chemotherapy and before any nausea was reported by the patients, the nine patients who subsequently experienced high levels of nausea had a greater overall percentage of abnormal clinical ANS tests than the 11 patients who subsequently developed low levels of nausea (P < 0.01). Twenty-four hours after treatment, the overall number of abnormal autonomic tests remained non-significantly higher than at the pretreatment baseline for the high nausea group. Demographic and clinical characteristics were not related to chemotherapy-induced nausea in this sample. Autonomic reactivity appears to be related to the development of nausea following chemotherapy. Further investigation of ANS involvement in chemotherapy-induced nausea could increase understanding of nausea etiology and potentially lead to the prediction of susceptible patients.

Background: Intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard primary therapy for advanced ovarian cancer. We conducted a phase 3 trial to compare the effects of intraperitoneal and intravenous cisplatin on the survival of women with previously untreated, stage III, epithelial ovarian cancer., Methods: The patients underwent an initial exploratory laparotomy and resection of all tumor masses larger than 2 cm. Within four weeks after surgery, six courses of intravenous cyclophosphamide (600 mg per square meter of body-surface area per course) plus either intraperitoneal cisplatin (100 mg per square meter) or intravenous cisplatin (100 mg per square meter) were administered at three-week intervals., Results: Of 654 randomized patients, 546 were eligible for the study. The estimated median survival was significantly longer in the group receiving intraperitoneal cisplatin (49 months; 95 percent confidence interval, 42 to 56) than in the group receiving intravenous cisplatin (41 months; 95 percent confidence interval, 34 to 47). The risk of death was lower in the intraperitoneal group than in the intravenous group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.96; P = 0.02). Moderate-to-severe tinnitus, clinical hearing loss, and neuromuscular toxic effects were significantly more frequent in the intravenous group., Conclusions: As compared with intravenous cisplatin, intraperitoneal cisplatin significantly improves survival and has significantly fewer toxic effects in patients with stage III ovarian cancer and residual tumor masses of 2 cm or less.

Advances in antiemetic therapy for cancer patients have been hindered by a lack of understanding of the physiological mechanisms associated with nausea and their corresponding measurement techniques. Here we review conceptual and methodological issues involved in developing an autonomic frame of reference for nausea and outline two strategies for assessing autonomic function. A primarily research-oriented strategy uses heart rate, blood volume pulse, pallor, and skin temperature to assess autonomic activity and reactivity over 24 hr. Peak values of these measures relative to time of emesis, heart rate spectral analyses of autonomic activity, and analyses of the standard deviation of successive differences of beat-to-beat intervals were all associated with subsequent nausea. A primarily clinically oriented strategy assesses normal and abnormal results on eight common bedside clinical tests of autonomic function. The total number of abnormal tests was associated with subsequent nausea. A better understanding of chemotherapy side effect mechanisms is likely to result in less polypharmacy and more effective individualized treatment for cancer patients.