Search

The citrus cultivar 'Local Juhong', which has historically been used as a traditional Chinese medicinal material, originated in Yuanjiang County, Hunan Province.Its parental type and genetic background are indistinct as of yet. Morphological observation shows that 'Local Juhong' has a slight oblateness in fruit shape, a relatively smooth pericarp, a fine and slightly raised oil vacuole, and an inward concave at the blossom end. The tree form and fruit and leaf morphology of 'Local Juhong' are similar to those of 'Huangpi' sour orange. To reveal the genetic background of 'Local Juhong', 21 citrus accessions were evaluated using nuclear and chloroplast SSR markers and whole-genome SNP information. 'Local Juhong' was grouped with mandarins and sub-grouped with 'Miyagawa Wase' and 'Yanxi Wanlu' in a nuclear SSR analysis, which indicated that its pollen parent might be mandarins. It was closely clustered with orange and pummelo in the chloroplast SSR analysis. The genomic sequence similarity rate of 'Local Juhong' with mandarin and pummelo heterozygosity was 70.88%; the main part was the heterozygosity, except for the unknown (19.66%), mandarin (8.73%), and pummelo (3.9%) parts. Thus, 'Local Juhong' may be an F1 hybrid with pummelo as the female parent and mandarin as the male parent, sharing sisterhood with 'Huangpi' sour orange. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In citrus, genetic improvement via biotechnology is hindered by the obstacle of in vitro regeneration via somatic embryogenesis (SE). Although a few B3 transcription factors are reported to regulate embryogenesis, little is known about the B3 superfamily in citrus, and which members might be involved in SE. Results: Genome-wide sequence analysis identified 72 (CsB3) and 69 (CgB3) putative B3 superfamily members in the genomes of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis, polyembryonic) and pummelo (C. grandis, monoembryonic), respectively. Genome duplication analysis indicated that segmental and tandem duplication events contributed to the expansion of the B3 superfamily in citrus, and that the B3 superfamily evolved under the effect of purifying selection. Phylogenetic relationships were well supported by conserved gene structure and motifs outside the B3 domain, which allowed possible functions to be inferred by comparison with homologous genes from Arabidopsis. Expression analysis identified 23 B3 superfamily members that were expressed during SE in citrus and 17 that may play functional roles at late SE stages. Eight B3 genes were identified that were specific to the genome of polyembryonic sweet orange compared to monoembryonic pummelo. Of these eight B3 genes, CsARF19 was found to be specifically expressed at higher levels in embryogenic callus (EC), implying its possible involvement in EC initiation. Conclusions: This study provides a genome-wide analysis of the citrus B3 superfamily, including its genome organization, evolutionary features and expression profiles, and identifies specific family members that may be associated with SE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Long intergenic non‐coding RNAs (lincRNAs) play important roles in various biological processes in plants. However, little information is known about the evolutionary characteristics of lincRNAs among closely related plant species. Here, we present a large‐scale comparative study of lincRNA transcription patterns in nine citrus species. By strand‐specific RNA‐sequencing, we identified 18 075 lincRNAs (14 575 lincRNA loci) from 34 tissue samples. The results indicated that the evolution of lincRNA transcription is more rapid than that of mRNAs. In total, 82.8–97.6% of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) lincRNA genes were shown to have homologous sequences in other citrus genomes. However, only 15.5–28.8% of these genes had transcribed homologous lincRNAs in these citrus species, presenting a strong contrast to the high conservation of mRNA transcription (81.6–84.7%). Moreover, primitive and modern citrus lincRNAs were preferentially expressed in reproductive and vegetative organs, respectively. Evolutionarily conserved lincRNAs showed higher expression levels and lower tissue specificity than species‐specific lincRNAs. Notably, we observed a similar tissue expression pattern of homologous lincRNAs in sweet orange and pummelo (Citrus grandis), suggesting that these lincRNAs may be functionally conserved and selectively maintained. We also identified and validated a lincRNA with the highest expression in fruit that acts as an endogenous target mimic (eTM) of csi‐miR166c, and two lincRNAs that act as a precursor and target of csi‐miR166c, respectively. These lincRNAs together with csi‐miR166c could form an eTM166‐miR166c‐targeted lincRNA regulatory network that possibly affects citrus fruit development. Significance Statement: Here, 18 075 lincRNAs have been identified from 34 tissue samples from nine citrus species. The data uncover the rapid turnover of lincRNA transcription among different citrus species and highlights the potential contribution of the eTM166‐miR166‐targeted lincRNA regulatory network to fruit development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]