Search

The choice of a suitable joining method is of major importance for the performance and durability of structural connections in any type of construction and in other branches of industry, such as the manufacturing of sliding vehicles. In addition to mechanical joints using high-strength bolts as well as welding, adhesive bonding is more and more being considered as a serious alternative. Hybrid joints are the focus of the research, especially to increase load-bearing capacity and reduce deformation. This project specifically aims at the combination of elementary bonded joints and High Strength Friction Grip Bolts to form the so-called pre-loaded hybrid joint. The pre-loaded hybrid joint optimally combines the specific advantages of both elementary joining methods and thus creates an efficient structural joint. This research takes up the findings of a previous project and focuses on the characterisation of the pre-loaded hybrid joint with regard to its application in the field. For this purpose, a comprehensive experimental test programme is carried out, which served for the validation of a numerical model generated for the computational load prediction in a companion paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Strength prediction of bonded joints remains a challenging task made even further complicated for hybrid joints in which adhesive is supplemented by mechanical fasteners. The present paper complements a series of experimental investigations on hybrid joints combining adhesive bonding with pre-tensioned bolts on galvanised and coated steel substrates, and considering two adhesives. The paper starts with modelling the strength of the bonded connection under the simultaneous action of tensile and compressive normal stresses, and shear. It then presents how these data are moulded into appropriate failure criteria and used the latter as input data for a subsequent full probabilistic finite element analysis. Following the paths of Weibull and subsequent researchers, joint capacity is predicted with reasonable accuracy for a dozen different combinations of substrates, adhesive, and pre-tension level – for which, on average, an accuracy slightly below 10% has been achieved. The results deliver meaningful insights into the subtle relationship between adhesive bonding, mechanical fastening, failure criteria, and resulting predictions methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous research indicated that glued-in rods (GiR), an adhesively bonded joint in which metallic rods are glued into wood blocks, are an efficient method to connect or reinforce structures in timber engineering, and represent a success story for adhesive bonding in civil engineering. In literature, GiR are mostly manufactured under perfect conditions, regarding both surface states and geometry, with outermost care taken to avoid any deviation thereof. However, in reality GiR are typically manufactured by staff that received little to no training, in particular with regard to the peculiarities of adhesive bonding. Thus the very high standards that apply in other industries, as for example aerospace, are hard to achieve. Additional constraints result from the relatively narrow gap in which the adhesive is injected, and the difficulty to monitor its complete and correct filling. For the manufacturing of GiR-connections several different techniques are used, which were mostly validated empirically. The influence of different manufacturing methods and potential defects on joint performance was investigated. Additionally, this paper sheds additional light on the influence of different typical defects on the load capacity of GiR with steel rods. Several defects, such as corrosion, contamination by oil, dust, wood chips, sand and moisture were considered, and performance of joints manufactured thereof compared to joints without such defects. The results of the research demonstrate that defects on GiR result in a non-negligible reduction of the load capacity, but that this effect is somewhat smaller than expected. Accordingly, GiR connections might be considered as relatively robust with regard to manufacturing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]