Search

Objective: The aim was to provide epidemiological and clinical data on patients with orofacial clefts in Lower Saxony in Germany., Materials and Methods: The records of 404 patients with orofacial clefts treated surgically at the University Medical Center Goettingen from 2001 to 2019 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Prevalence of orofacial clefts in general, orofacial clefts as manifestation of a syndrome, sex distribution, and prevalence of different cleft types was evaluated and associated with the need for corrective surgery, family history, pregnancy complications, and comorbidities., Results: The prevalence of orofacial clefts for Goettingen in Lower Saxony was 1:890. 231 patients were male and 173 were female. CLP was most common (39.1%) followed by CP (34.7%), CL (14.4%), CLA (9.9%), and facial clefts (2%). The left side was more frequently affected and unilateral cleft forms occurred more often than bilateral ones. Almost 10% of the population displayed syndromic CL/P. 10.9% of all patients had a positive family history regarding CL/P, predominantly from the maternal side. Pregnancy abnormalities were found in 11.4%, most often in the form of preterm birth. Comorbidities, especially of the cardiovascular system, were found in 30.2% of the sample. 2.2% of patients treated according to the University Medical Center Goettingen protocol corrective surgery was performed in form of a velopharyngoplasty or residual hole closure., Conclusions: The epidemiological and clinical profile of the study population resembled the expected distributions in Western populations. The large number of syndromic CL/P and associated comorbidities supports the need for specialized cleft centers and interdisciplinary cleft care., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate (CLAP) may suffer from marked asymmetry with an impact on attractiveness and psychosocial aspects. The aim of this study was to assess symmetry in CLAP patients compared to non-cleft controls of similar age with regard to cleft type and treatment concept., Materials and Methods: In CLAP patients with different cleft forms and in healthy non-cleft subjects (control group) a three-dimensional stereophotogrammetric face scan was performed and an objective 3D asymmetry index (AI) was calculated for the whole face, the midface, the upper lip and the nose., Results: In total, 305 patients were included: 140 CLAP patients (90 male, 50 female, mean age 9.9 ± 3.6 years) and 165 controls (87 male, 78 female, mean age 8.7 ± 2.1 years). In general, CLAP patients showed significantly higher asymmetry than controls, with the most severe asymmetry found in unilateral complete CLAP. Patients treated according to an actual concept considering reconstruction of all affected muscular systems had a significant lower and more favourable AI than patients not treated according to this concept (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: An adequate treatment concept is essential to achieve better results concerning symmetry in CLAP, but symmetry values of healthy non-cleft controls are not reached., (Copyright © 2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this work was to analyse early upper-jaw development in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated using two different concepts and to compare shape and size developments between these two groups and a group of noncleft patients., Materials and Methods: A total of 204 maxillary casts available for this study from 50 UCLP patients were analyzed for upper-jaw development based on three-dimensional measurements performed with a Reflex Microscope from birth up to 71 months of age. Thirty-five of these 50 patients were part of an early treatment group (two-stage cleft closure with single-stage palatoplasty at an age of 10-14 months) and 15 were part of a late treatment group (two-stage cleft closure with palatoplasty at an age of 4-7 years). The control group included 39 casts of 17 noncleft patients., Results: Analysis of shape and size between the patients in the three groups yielded statistically significant differences between the cleft and the noncleft patients. In both treatment groups, we made observations typically associated with cleft formation like lateralization, asymmetry of the greater and lesser cleft segments, and pronounced vertical deviations of the segments. Viewed in all dimensions, however, the patients in the early treatment group approached the control group more closely, although a statistically significant difference was still observed., Conclusion: Our results suggest that the timing of hard-palate closure is not a decisive factor for upper-jaw development. Intrinsic factors (initial cleft width, presence of tooth buds) and the surgeon's skills appear to have a much more defining role.

Copyright of Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)