Search

• Physical and biological variables identified as strong indicators of ecosystem change. • Contrasting regions provided useful insights on ecosystem responses to disturbances. • Interactions between indicators can dramatically change over time. • Ecosystem change linked to physical pressures and primary production changes. • Hidden variable modelled ecosystem changes. Understanding ecosystem dynamics within shallow shelf seas is of great importance to support marine spatial management of natural populations and activities such as fishing and offshore renewable energy production to combat climate change. Given the possibility of future changes, a baseline is needed to predict ecosystems responses to such changes. This study uses Bayesian techniques to find the data-driven estimates of interactions among a set of physical and biological variables and a human pressure within the last 30 years in a well-studied shallow sea (North Sea, UK) with four contrasting regions and their associated ecosystems. A hidden variable is incorporated to model functional ecosystem change, where the underlying interactions dramatically change, following natural or anthropogenic disturbance. Data-driven estimates of interactions were identified, highlighting physical (e.g. bottom temperature, potential energy anomaly) and biological variables (e.g. sandeel larvae, net primary production) to be strong indicators of ecosystem change. There was consistency in the physical and biological variables, identified as good indicators in three of the regions, however the shallower region (with depths < 50 m, that is targeted for static offshore wind developments) was the most dissimilar. The use of contrasting regions provided useful insights on responses linked to ecosystem disturbances and identified the top predators as better indicators for each region, with the harbour porpoise being a particularly valuable indicator of ecosystem change across most regions. Another important finding was the dramatic changes in the strength of many interactions over time. This suggests that physical and biological indicators should only be used with additional temporal information, as changes in strength led to the identification of two potentially significant periods of ecosystem change (after 2005 and after 2010), linked to physical pressures (e.g. cold-water anomalies, seen in bottom temperatures; salinity changes, seen in the potential energy anomaly) and primary production changes. The hidden variable also modelled a change in the early 2000s for all the regions and identified maximum chlorophyll-a and sea surface temperature as some of the better indicators of these ecosystem changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]