Search

Projections of hydrological changes are associated with large uncertainties from different sources, which should be quantified for an effective implementation of water management policies adaptive to future climate change. In this study, a modeling chain framework to project future hydrological changes and the associated uncertainties in the Xijiang River basin, South China, was established. The framework consists of three emission scenarios (ESs), four climate models (CMs), four statistical downscaling (SD) methods, four hydrological modeling (HM) schemes, and four probability distributions (PDs) for extreme flow frequency analyses. Direct variance method was adopted to analyze the manner by which uncertainty sources such as ES, CM, SD, and HM affect the estimates of future evapotranspiration (ET) and streamflow, and to quantify the uncertainties of PDs in future flood and drought risk assessment. Results show that ES is one of the least important uncertainty sources in most situations. CM, in general, is the dominant uncertainty source for the projections of monthly ET and monthly streamflow during most of the annual cycle, daily streamflow below the 99.6% quantile level, and extreme low flow. SD is the most predominant uncertainty source in the projections of extreme high flow, and has a considerable percentage of uncertainty contribution in monthly streamflow projections in July–September. The effects of SD in other cases are negligible. HM is a non-ignorable uncertainty source that has the potential to produce much larger uncertainties for the projections of low flow and ET in warm and wet seasons than for the projections of high flow. PD contributes a larger percentage of uncertainty in extreme flood projections than it does in extreme low flow estimates. Despite the large uncertainties in hydrological projections, this work found that future extreme low flow would undergo a considerable reduction, and a noticeable increase in drought risk in the Xijiang River basin would be expected. Thus, the necessity of employing effective water-saving techniques and adaptive water resources management strategies for drought disaster mitigation should be addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extreme flow projections are of considerable necessity for flood and drought disaster prevention and sustainable water resources management to adapt to future climate change. However, these projections are usually associated with large uncertainties arising from different sources. A numerical modeling system including three emission scenarios (ESs), four climate models (CMs), four statistical downscaling (SD) methods, four hydrological modeling (HM) schemes, and four probability distribution (PD) functions was established in this study to project future extreme flow changes at basin scales. This modeling system was employed in the following three watersheds with different climatic and topographical characteristics in China: The Upper Ganjiang River basin (UGRB) in the humid region, the Laoha River basin (LRB) in the semi-arid region, and the Yellow River source region (YRSR) in the semi-humid region. Subsequently, the analysis of variance approach (ANOVA) was used to quantify the contribution of different uncertainty sources in extreme flow projections. Results show that extreme high flow was projected to increase in all basins. By contrast, extreme low flow would decrease in UGRB, and inconsistent change signals were found in LRB and YRSR. The ANOVA-based assessment reveals that CM is generally the dominant uncertainty source for mean monthly streamflow and extreme low flow projections. ES explains a large proportion of total uncertainty for extreme low flow projection in the 2060s in UGRB because of the large difference in non-precipitation frequency projected under different ESs. SD is the main uncertainty source in extreme high flow projection in UGRB where extreme precipitation events frequently occur. Compared with other basins, HM produces relatively high uncertainty in LRB due to its inferior performance in historical streamflow simulations. PD contributes a low percentage of uncertainty in extreme flow projections. Interactions among uncertainty sources even produce larger uncertainties than most individual sources. Although future extreme flow projections are associated with non-negligible uncertainties, the projected remarkable changes in extreme high and low flows indicate that stakeholders should take certain measures to mitigate flood risks in the three basins and alleviate drought risks in UGRB • Extreme high flow would increase in the three basins with different climate features. • Extreme low flow would decrease in the watershed in humid regions. • Uncertainty of extreme flow projection is generally dominated by climate models. • Uncertainty sources have different impacts associated with watershed characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]