8 results on '"Etiope, Giuseppe"'
Search Results
2. Global methane emission through mud volcanoes and its past and present impact on the Earth’s climate—a comment
- Author
-
Milkov, Alexei V. and Etiope, Giuseppe
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Seasonal Variation of Methane Microseepage in the Dawanqi Oilfield (China): A Possible Climatic Control.
- Author
-
Zhao, Yujia, Wang, Guojian, Etiope, Giuseppe, Wang, Yong, Zhu, Zhenzhen, Wang, Chunhui, Chen, Xufeng, and Tang, Junhong
- Subjects
NATURAL gas ,CLIMATE change ,METHANE & the environment ,EMISSION control ,ENVIRONMENTAL engineering - Abstract
Natural gas microseepage in petroleum‐bearing sedimentary basins is an important complement to geophysical methods in oil‐gas exploration and a natural source of methane (CH4) for the atmosphere. Microseepage, typically occurring in correspondence with petroleum fields throughout the world, is generally lower in summer, due to temperature‐driven methanotrophic consumption, and higher in winter. The global estimates of microseepage methane emission have, however, relatively high uncertainties because of limited amounts of flux data, leading to poor knowledge of the spatial distribution and temporal variability of the gas emission factors. We studied the seasonal variation of microseepage flux to the atmosphere from a petroleum field in China (the Dawanqi oilfield), through methane flux measurements performed in summer 2014, winter 2015, and summer 2019. Winter data refer to frozen soil conditions, with snow cover and ice thickness in the soil exceeding 60 cm. Gas concentration (CH4, CO2, C2+ alkanes) and stable C isotopic composition of CH4 and CO2 in shallow (4 m deep) boreholes confirmed the existence of thermogenic gas seepage. Methane microseepage is higher in summer and lower or nil in winter. This seasonal trend is opposite to what was observed in areas where winter soil is not or poorly frozen. Our data suggest that seasonal microseepage variation may not be univocal worldwide, being strongly dependent on the presence of ice and snow cover in winter. The regional increase of temperature due to climate change, already demonstrated for the Tarim Basin over the last 50 years, could, in the future, reduce winter ice and enhance annual methane emission to the atmosphere. Key Points: Microseepage of thermogenic gas over the Dawanqi oilfield is confirmed by molecular and isotopic hydrocarbon data in 4‐m deep boreholesContrary to previous observations in other petroleum basins, methane fluxes to the atmosphere are higher in summer and lower in winter due to relevant ice thickness in the soilMethanotrophic consumption and the ice‐snow barrier effect compete in the establishment of the seasonal microseepage pattern; microseepage may increase in future milder winters due to regional climatic warming [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Evidence for massive emission of methane from a deep-water gas field during the Pliocene.
- Author
-
Foschi, Martino, Cartwright, Joseph A., MacMinn, Christopher W., and Etiope, Giuseppe
- Subjects
ATMOSPHERIC methane ,METHANE ,WATER seepage ,EVIDENCE ,DATA modeling - Abstract
Geologic hydrocarbon seepage is considered to be the dominant natural source of atmospheric methane in terrestrial and shallowwater areas; in deep-water areas, in contrast, hydrocarbon seepage is expected to have no atmospheric impact because the gas is typically consumed throughout the water column. Here, we present evidence for a sudden expulsion of a reservoir-size quantity of methane from a deep-water seep during the Pliocene, resulting from natural reservoir overpressure. Combining three-dimensional seismic data, borehole data and fluid-flow modeling, we estimate that 18-27 of the 23-31 Tg of methane released at the seafloor could have reached the atmosphere over 39-241 days. This emission is ~10% and ~28% of present-day, annual natural and petroleum- industry methane emissions, respectively. While no such ultraseepage events have been documented in modern times and their frequency is unknown, seismic data suggest they were not rare in the past and may potentially occur at present in critically pressurized reservoirs. This neglected phenomenon can influence decadal changes in atmospheric methane. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The Global Methane Budget: 2000-2012.
- Author
-
Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Poulter, Ben, Peregon, Anna, Ciais, Philippe, Canadell, Josep G., Dlugokencky, Edward J., Etiope, Giuseppe, Bastviken, David, Houweling, Sander, Janssens-Maenhout, Greet, Tubiello, Francesco N., Castaldi, Simona, Jackson, Robert B., Alexe, Mihai, Arora, Vivek K., Beerling, David J., Bergamaschi, Peter, Blake, Donald R., and Brailsford, Gordon
- Subjects
CLIMATE change mitigation ,ENVIRONMENTAL protection ,CLIMATE change ,METHANE ,HYDROXYL group ,CARBON dioxide ,GLOBAL warming - Abstract
The global methane (CH
4 ) budget is becoming an increasingly important component for managing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. This relevance, due to a shorter atmospheric lifetime and a stronger warming potential than carbon dioxide, is challenged by the still unexplained changes of atmospheric CH4 over the past decade. Emissions and concentrations of CH4 are continuing to increase making CH4 the second most important human-induced greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Two major difficulties in reducing uncertainties come from the large variety of diffusive CH4 sources that overlap geographically, and from the destruction of CH4 by the very short-lived hydroxyl radical (OH). To address these difficulties, we have established a consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate research on the methane cycle, and producing regular (~biennial) updates of the global methane budget. This consortium includes atmospheric physicists and chemists, biogeochemists of surface and marine emissions, and socio-economists who study anthropogenic emissions. Following Kirschke et al. (2013), we propose here the first version of a living review paper that integrates results of top-down studies (T-D, exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models, inventories, and data-driven approaches (B-U, including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, and inventories for anthropogenic emissions, data-driven extrapolations). For the 2003-2012 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by T-D inversions at 558 & Tg & CH4 & yr-1 (range [540-568]). About 60 & % of global emissions are anthropogenic (range [50-65 & %]). B-U approaches suggest larger global emissions (736 & Tg & CH4 & yr-1 [596-884]) mostly because of larger natural emissions from individual sources such as inland waters, natural wetlands and geological sources. Considering the atmospheric constraints on the T-D budget, it is likely that some of the individual emissions reported by the B-U approaches are overestimated, leading to too large global emissions. Latitudinal data from T-D emissions indicate a predominance of tropical emissions (~64 & % of the global budget, < & 30° & N) as compared to mid (~32 & %, 30° & N-60° & N) and high northern latitudes (~ & 4 & %, 60° & N-90° & N). T-D inversions consistently infer lower emissions in China (~58 & Tg & CH4 & yr-1 [51-72], -14 & %) and higher emissions in Africa (86 & Tg & CH4 & yr-1 [73-108], +19 & %) than B-U values used as prior estimates. Overall, uncertainties for anthropogenic emissions appear smaller than those from natural sources, and the uncertainties on source categories appear larger for T-D inversions than for B-U inventories and models. The most important source of uncertainty on the methane budget is attributable to emissions from wetland and other inland waters. We show that the wetland extent could contribute for 30-40 & % on the estimated range for wetland emissions. Other priorities for improving the methane budget include: i) the development of process-based models for inland-water emissions, ii) the intensification of methane observations at local scale (flux measurements) to constrain B-U land surface models, and at regional scale (surface networks and satellites) to constrain T-D inversions, iii) improvements in the estimation of atmospheric loss by OH, and iv) improvements of the transport models integrated in T-D inversions. The data presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (doi:10.3334/CDIAC/Global_Methane_Budget_2016). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Did geologic emissions of methane play any role in Quaternary climate change?
- Author
-
Etiope, Giuseppe, Milkov, Alexei V., and Derbyshire, Edward
- Subjects
- *
METHANE , *CLIMATE change , *EMISSION control , *GREENHOUSE gas mitigation - Abstract
Abstract: The “methane-led hypotheses” assume that gas hydrates and marine seeps are the sole geologic factors controlling Quaternary atmospheric and climate changes. Nevertheless, a wider class of geologic sources of methane exist which could have played a role in past climate changes. Beyond offshore seepage, relevant geologic emissions of methane (GEM) are from onshore seepage, including mud volcanism, microseepage and geothermal flux; altogether GEM are the second most important natural source of atmospheric methane at present. The amount of methane entering the atmosphere from onshore GEM seems to prevail on that from offshore seepage. Onshore sources inject a predominantly isotopically heavy (13C-enriched) methane into the atmosphere. They are controlled mainly by endogenic (geodynamic) processes, which induce large-scale gas flow variations over geologic and millennial time scales, and only partially by exogenic (surface) conditions, so that they are not affected by negative feedbacks. The eventual influence on atmospheric methane concentration does not necessarily require catastrophic or abrupt releases, as proposed for the “clathrate gun hypothesis”. Enhanced degassing from these sources could have contributed to the methane trends observed in the ice core records, and could explain the late Quaternary peaks of increased methane concentrations accompanied by the enrichment of isotopically heavy methane, as recently observed. This hypothesis shall be tested by means of robust multidisciplinary studies, mainly based on a series of atmospheric, biologic and geologic proxies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Estimates of gas release at the LUSI sediment-hosted hydrothermal system, Java, Indonesia.
- Author
-
Mazzini, Adriano, Sciarra, Alessandra, Etiope, Giuseppe, Husein, Alwi, and Svensen, Henrik
- Subjects
- *
SEDIMENTARY basins , *HYDROTHERMAL vents , *NATURAL gas pipelines , *PETROLOGY , *CLIMATE change , *IGNEOUS provinces , *ELECTRIC conduits , *FLUID inclusions - Abstract
Lusi is a sediment-hosted hydrothermal system located in North-East Java, Indonesia. This eruption has been actively bursting boiling mud breccia, oil, gas, and water since the 29th of May 2006 and today occupies a region of 7 km2. Over this large area are scattered thousands of active seepage sites that surround a 100 m diameter central vent characterized by a geysering behaviour. Geophysical, petrography, and geochemical investigations revealed that Lusi is fuelled by a magmatic intrusion at depth, and that hydrothermal fluids migrate from the neighbouring Arjuno-Welirang volcanic complex and into the Lusi conduit zone. A dedicated survey was designed 1) to estimate the type and the amount of gas released both from the seeps and from the central vent, and 2) to map the preferential pathways for the fluids migration. Besides aqueous vapour, CO2 and CH4 represent the main gases released from Lusi. Results show that the areas of intense degassing are along fractured zones of the NE-SW oriented Watukosek fault system. This fault system connects Lusi with the neighbouring volcanoes. The whole area surrounding the crater releases primarily CH4 from thousands of satellite seeps and by invisible diffuse seepage. In contrast, the central vent is CO2–dominated both during the quiescent and geysering phases. Our estimates show that, since the beginning of its activity, Lusi has released carbon into the atmosphere in the order of Mt units. Lusi is unique on Earth today, but has several characteristics in common with the so-called hydrothermal vent complexes from the geological past. The hydrothermal vent complexes were formed as a result of degassing in sedimentary basins affected by Large igneous provinces, and may be responsible for rapid climate changes such as the Toarcian event and the PETM. We argue that Lusi represents the only modern analogue for these palaeo systems. Therefore, quantification of the Lusi degassing holds the promise for a better understanding of the dynamics of deep time carbon degassing from sedimentary basins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
8. The global methane budget 2000-2012
- Author
-
Akihiko Ito, Philippe Ciais, Peter Bergamaschi, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, David J. Beerling, Cyril Crevoisier, Philippe Bousquet, Julia Marshall, Simona Castaldi, Isabelle Pison, Heon Sook Kim, Yasunori Tohjima, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Atsushi Takizawa, Charles L. Curry, Debra Wunch, Kyle C. McDonald, Michel Ramonet, David Bastviken, Simon O'Doherty, Josep G. Canadell, Robin Locatelli, Francesco N. Tubiello, Prabir K. Patra, P. Steele, Brett F. Thornton, Catherine Prigent, Sander Houweling, Toshinobu Machida, David J. Wilton, Joe R. Melton, Ronald G. Prinn, William J. Riley, Edward J. Dlugokencky, Monia Santini, Giuseppe Etiope, Doug Worthy, Guido R. van der Werf, Christian Frankenberg, Shushi Peng, Vivek K. Arora, Patrick M. Crill, Ray F. Weiss, Nicolas Viovy, Michiel van Weele, Anna Peregon, Shamil Maksyutov, Vaishali Naik, Zhen Zhang, Thomas Kleinen, Lori Bruhwiler, Yukio Yoshida, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Kristofer R. Covey, Fortunat Joos, Misa Ishizawa, Bowen Zhang, Christine Wiedinmyer, Ronny Schroeder, Nicola Gedney, Hanqin Tian, Changhui Peng, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Mihai Alexe, Victor Brovkin, Ray L. Langenfelds, Isamu Morino, Glen P. Peters, Xiyan Xu, Andy Wiltshire, Isobel J. Simpson, Ben Poulter, Marielle Saunois, Qiuan Zhu, Donald R. Blake, Paul B. Krummel, Frans-Jan W. Parmentier, Makoto Saito, Gordon Brailsford, Robert B. Jackson, Renato Spahni, Earth and Climate, Hydrology and Geo-environmental sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Saunois, Marielle, Bousquet, Philippe, Poulter, Ben, Peregon, Anna, Ciais, Philippe, Canadell Josep, G, Dlugokencky Edward, J., Etiope, Giuseppe, Bastviken, David, Houweling, Sander, Janssens Maenhout, Greet, Tubiello Francesco, N., Castaldi, Simona, Jackson Robert, B., Alexe, Mihai, Arora Vivek, K., Beerling David, J., Bergamaschi, Peter, Blake Donald, R., Brailsford, Gordon, Brovkin, Victor, Bruhwiler, Lori, Crevoisier, Cyril, Crill, Patrick, Covey, Kristofer, Curry, Charle, Frankenberg, Christian, Gedney, Nicola, Höglund Isaksson, Lena, Ishizawa, Misa, Ito, Akihiko, Joos, Fortunat, Kim Heon, Sook, Kleinen, Thoma, Krummel, Paul, Lamarque Jean, Françoi, Langenfelds, Ray, Locatelli, Robin, Machida, Toshinobu, Maksyutov, Shamil, McDonald Kyle, C., Marshall, Julia, Melton Joe, R., Morino, Isamu, Naik Vaishali, Oapo, Doherty, Simon, Parmentier Frans Jan, W., Patra Prabir, K., Peng, Changhui, Peng, Shushi, Peters Glen, P., Pison, Isabelle, Prigent, Catherine, Prinn, Ronald, Ramonet, Michel, Riley William, J., Saito, Makoto, Santini, Monia, Schroeder, Ronny, Simpson Isobel, J., Spahni, Renato, Steele, Paul, Takizawa, Atsushi, Thornton Brett, F., Tian, Hanqin, Tohjima, Yasunori, Viovy, Nicola, Voulgarakis, Apostolo, van Weele, Michiel, van der Werf Guido, R., Weiss, Ray, Wiedinmyer, Christine, Wilton David, J., Wiltshire, Andy, Worthy, Doug, Wunch, Debra, Xu, Xiyan, Yoshida, Yukio, Zhang, Bowen, Zhang, Zhen, Zhu, Qiuan, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Modélisation INVerse pour les mesures atmosphériques et SATellitaires (SATINV), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), ICOS-ATC (ICOS-ATC), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, The Department of Thematic Studies - Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University (LIU), SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON), European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] (JRC), LM, Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma), Environment and Climate Change Canada, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield [Sheffield], JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES), Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539) (LMD), Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Département des Géosciences - ENS Paris, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Tropospheric sounding, assimilation, and modeling group [JPL], Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH)-NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Climate and Environmental Physics [Bern] (CEP), Physikalisches Institut [Bern], Universität Bern [Bern] (UNIBE)-Universität Bern [Bern] (UNIBE), Atmospheric Chemistry Division [Boulder], National Center for Atmospheric Research [Boulder] (NCAR), Oceans and Atmosphere, CSIRO, Strathom Energie, Centre Européen de Réalité Virtuelle (CERV), École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest (ENIB), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), ICOS-RAMCES (ICOS-RAMCES), Laboratoire d'Etude du Rayonnement et de la Matière en Astrophysique (LERMA), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Cergy Pontoise (UCP), Université Paris-Seine-Université Paris-Seine-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Shandong Agricultural University (SDAU), Modélisation des Surfaces et Interfaces Continentales (MOSAIC), Department of Physics [Imperial College London], Imperial College London, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences [Amsterdam] (FALW), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO - UC San Diego), University of California [San Diego] (UC San Diego), University of California (UC)-University of California (UC), Met Office Hadley Centre for Climate Change (MOHC), United Kingdom Met Office [Exeter], Climate Research Division [Toronto], California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Laboratoire de Physique et d'Etude des Matériaux (UMR 8213) (LPEM), Ecole Superieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris (ESPCI Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), USC Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California (USC), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Prinn, Ronald G, Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Département des Géosciences - ENS Paris, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-École polytechnique (X)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC), Universität Bern [Bern]-Universität Bern [Bern], Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO), and University of California-University of California
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Naturgeografi ,TRACE GASES ,010501 environmental sciences ,Atmospheric sciences ,7. Clean energy ,01 natural sciences ,Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience ,Methane ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Natural gas ,11. Sustainability ,SDG 13 - Climate Action ,Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences ,Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ,Greenhouse effect ,lcsh:Environmental sciences ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,lcsh:GE1-350 ,[PHYS]Physics [physics] ,GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS ,methane ,lcsh:QE1-996.5 ,Geology ,PAST 2 DECADES ,Carbon project ,Atmospheric chemistry ,Physical Sciences ,hydroxyl ,Earth and Related Environmental Sciences ,Wetland methane emissions ,BIOMASS BURNING EMISSIONS ,NATURAL-GAS ,PROCESS-BASED MODEL ,TROPOSPHERIC METHANE ,530 Physics ,methane sources ,Climate change ,Atmospheric Sciences ,ATMOSPHERIC HYDROXYL RADICALS ,SDG 14 - Life Below Water ,ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION ,550 Earth sciences & geology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,global model ,Science & Technology ,business.industry ,Environmental engineering ,Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap ,15. Life on land ,methane budget ,lcsh:Geology ,Climate Action ,Geochemistry ,chemistry ,Physical Geography ,13. Climate action ,Greenhouse gas ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Environmental science ,business ,[PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph] ,INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT ACCMIP - Abstract
The global methane (CH4) budget is becoming an increasingly important component for managing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. This relevance, due to a shorter atmospheric lifetime and a stronger warming potential than carbon dioxide, is challenged by the still unexplained changes of atmospheric CH4 over the past decade. Emissions and concentrations of CH4 are continuing to increase, making CH4 the second most important human-induced greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Two major difficulties in reducing uncertainties come from the large variety of diffusive CH4 sources that overlap geographically, and from the destruction of CH4 by the very short-lived hydroxyl radical (OH). To address these difficulties, we have established a consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate research on the methane cycle, and producing regular (similar to biennial) updates of the global methane budget. This consortium includes atmospheric physicists and chemists, biogeochemists of surface and marine emissions, and socio-economists who study anthropogenic emissions. Following Kirschke et al. (2013), we propose here the first version of a living review paper that integrates results of top-down studies (exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models, inventories and data-driven approaches (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, and inventories for anthropogenic emissions, data-driven extrapolations). For the 2003-2012 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by top-down inversions at 558 TgCH(4) yr(-1), range 540-568. About 60% of global emissions are anthropogenic (range 50-65 %). Since 2010, the bottom-up global emission inventories have been closer to methane emissions in the most carbon-intensive Representative Concentrations Pathway (RCP8.5) and higher than all other RCP scenarios. Bottom-up approaches suggest larger global emissions (736 TgCH(4) yr(-1), range 596-884) mostly because of larger natural emissions from individual sources such as inland waters, natural wetlands and geological sources. Considering the atmospheric constraints on the top-down budget, it is likely that some of the individual emissions reported by the bottom-up approaches are overestimated, leading to too large global emissions. Latitudinal data from top-down emissions indicate a predominance of tropical emissions (similar to 64% of the global budget, amp;lt;30 degrees N) as compared to mid (similar to 32 %, 30-60 degrees N) and high northern latitudes (similar to 4 %, 60-90 degrees N). Top-down inversions consistently infer lower emissions in China (similar to 58 TgCH(4) yr(-1), range 51-72, -14 %) and higher emissions in Africa (86 TgCH(4) yr(-1), range 73-108, + 19 %) than bottom-up values used as prior estimates. Overall, uncertainties for anthropogenic emissions appear smaller than those from natural sources, and the uncertainties on source categories appear larger for top-down inversions than for bottom-up inventories and models. The most important source of uncertainty on the methane budget is attributable to emissions from wetland and other inland waters. We show that the wetland extent could contribute 30-40% on the estimated range for wetland emissions. Other priorities for improving the methane budget include the following: (i) the development of process-based models for inland-water emissions, (ii) the intensification of methane observations at local scale (flux measurements) to constrain bottom-up land surface models, and at regional scale (surface networks and satellites) to constrain top-down inversions, (iii) improvements in the estimation of atmospheric loss by OH, and (iv) improvements of the transport models integrated in top-down inversions. The data presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (http://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/GLOBAL_METHANE_BUDGET_2016_V1.1) and the Global Carbon Project. Funding Agencies|Swiss National Science Foundation; NASA [NNX14AF93G, NNX14AO73G]; National Environmental Science Program - Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub; European Commission [283576, 633080]; ESA Climate Change Initiative Greenhouse Gases Phase 2 project; US Department of Energy, BER [DE-AC02-05CH11231]; FAO member countries; Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [2-1502]; ERC [322998]; NERC [NE/J00748X/1]; Swedish Research Council VR; Research Council of Norway [244074]; NSF [1243232, 1243220]; National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC); Chinas QianRen Program; CSIRO Australia; Australian Bureau of Meteorology; Australian Institute of Marine Science; Australian Antarctic Division; NOAA USA; Meteorological Service of Canada; National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA) [NAG5-12669, NNX07AE89G, NNX11AF17G, NNX07AE87G, NNX07AF09G, NNX11AF15G, NNX11AF16G]; Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC, UK) [GA01081]; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO Australia); Bureau of Meteorology (Australia); Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
- Published
- 2016
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.