1. A Method to Assess and Explain Changes in Sub‐Daily Precipitation Return Levels From Convection‐Permitting Simulations.
- Author
-
Dallan, Eleonora, Borga, Marco, Fosser, Giorgia, Canale, Antonio, Roghani, Bardia, Marani, Marco, and Marra, Francesco
- Subjects
ATMOSPHERIC models ,LANDSLIDE hazard analysis ,LANDSLIDES ,RAINFALL ,EXTREME value theory ,CLIMATE research ,ECONOMIES of scale - Abstract
Reliable projections of extreme future precipitation are fundamental for risk management and adaptation strategies. Convection‐permitting models (CPMs) explicitly resolve large convective systems and represent sub‐daily extremes more realistically than coarser resolution models, but present short records due to the high computational costs. Here, we evaluate the potential of a non‐asymptotic approach, the Simplified Metastatistical Extreme Value (SMEV) to provide information on the future change of extreme sub‐daily return levels based on CPM simulations. We focus on a complex‐orography area in the North Eastern Italy and use three 10‐year time periods COSMO‐crCLIM simulations (2.2 km resolution) under RCP8.5 scenario. When compared to a block r‐maxima approach currently used in similar applications, the proposed approach shows reduced uncertainty in rare return level estimates (about 5%–10% smaller confidence interval) and can improve the quantification of future changes from CPM simulations. We evaluate these changes and their statistical significance in return levels for 1–24 hr durations. The changes show an interesting spatial organization associated with orography, with significant positive changes located at high elevations. These positive changes tend to increase with increasing return period and decreasing duration. Because SMEV can separate the roles of event intensity and occurrence, it allows for physical interpretations of these changes. We suggest that non‐asymptotic approaches permit the quantification of change in rare extremes within available CPM runs. Plain Language Summary: Short duration heavy rainfall may lead to various natural hazards like floods and landslides. Expected change in extreme precipitation due to global warming is a major concern. However, we still cannot quantify these changes because typical climate models cannot reproduce extreme precipitation accurately. The few models that can are very computationally expensive so that we have too few simulations for properly quantifying changes in extremes using traditional statistical methods. Here, we show how to use a new statistical method to quantify extremes from short model simulations. This method is more accurate than currently used methods and may help provide additional insights on the reasons underlying the observed changes. This method could represent a new tool in the hands of the climate research community. Examining the simulations of one model over North‐Eastern Italy, we report an increase in extreme precipitation in mountainous areas and a non‐significant decrease in the low elevation areas. Key Points: Future changes in extreme precipitation are estimated from a convection‐permitting climate model using a non‐asymptotic statistical approachThe method allows to evaluate the significance of the future changes in return levels and to link them to the changing processesSignificant increase in return levels is generally found in the mountains, higher at the short durations (1–3 hr) and for rarer return levels [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF