1. Frequency Bias Causes Overestimation of Climate Change Impacts on Global Flood Occurrence.
- Author
-
Zhao, Fang, Lange, Stefan, Goswami, Bedartha, and Frieler, Katja
- Subjects
DISTRIBUTION (Probability theory) ,CLIMATE change ,HYDROLOGIC models ,FLOODS - Abstract
The frequency change of 100‐year flood events is often determined by fitting extreme value distributions to annual maximum discharge from a historical base period. This study demonstrates that this approach may significantly bias the computed flood frequency change. An idealized experiment shows frequency bias exceeding 100% for a 50‐year base period. Further analyses using Monte Carlo simulations, mathematical derivations, and hydrological model outputs reveal that bias magnitude inversely relates to base period length and is weakly influenced by the generalized extreme value distribution's shape parameter. The bias, persisting across different estimation methods, implies floods may exceed local defenses designed based on short historical records more often than expected, even without climate change. We introduce a frequency bias adjustment method, which significantly reduces the projected rise in global flood occurrence. This suggests a substantial part of the earlier projected increase in flood occurrence and impacts is not attributable to climate change. Plain Language Summary: We report a previously overlooked bias in a common method for projecting the frequency of extreme floods, like 100‐year events. This method typically uses a short period of historical data for two primary purposes: first, to define local thresholds for extreme floods, such as 100‐year events, and second, to serve as a base for projecting future changes in flood occurrences. Our study, utilizing random data, demonstrates that this method can lead to inaccurate projections, increasing the number of expected extreme floods in future years and decreasing them in historical baseline years, even when no change is indicated by the data. Additionally, we find that the longer the historical period used, the smaller the bias. By simulating the characteristics of real hydrological model projections with artificial data, we are able to estimate a bias similar to that observed in these projections, and thus propose a simple method for its mitigation. Our findings indicate that previous studies might have overstated the impact of climate change on the projected increase in flood frequency and affected people. Additionally, using short historical records to design flood defenses can lead to more frequent flooding than anticipated, even without climate change. Key Points: Using a short historical period both to define extreme flood thresholds and as a base for future projections leads to significant biasThis bias shows an inverse relationship with the length of the base period and is slightly influenced by certain data characteristicsWe propose a practical adjustment method and suggestions to reduce biases in estimating future flood frequency changes [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF