Search

To quantitatively analyze the impact of climate variability and human activities on grassland productivity of China's Qilian Mountain National Park, this study used Carnegic-Ames-Stanford Approach model (CASA) and Integrated Vegetation model improved by the Comprehensive and Sequential Classification System (CSCS) to assess the trends of grassland NPP from 2000 to 2015, the residual trend analysis method was used to quantify the impact of human activities and climate change on the grassland based on the NPP changes. The actual grassland NPP accumulation mainly occurred in June, July and August (autumn); the actual NPP showed a fluctuating upward trend with an average increase of 2.2 g C·m-2 a-1, while the potential NPP increase of 1.6 g C·m-2 a-1 and human-induced NPP decreased of 0.5 g C·m-2 a-1. The annual temperature showed a fluctuating upward trend with an average increase of 0.1°C 10a-1, but annual precipitation showed a fluctuating upward trend with an average annual increase of 1.3 mm a-1 from 2000 to 2015. The area and NPP of grassland degradation caused by climate variability was significantly greater than that caused by human activities and mainly distributed in the northwest and central regions, but area and NPP of grassland restored caused by human activities was significantly greater than that caused by climate variability and mainly distributed in the southeast regions. In conclusion, grassland in Qilian Mountain National Park showed a trend of degradation based on distribution area, but showed a trend of restoration based on actual NPP. Climate variability was the main cause of grassland degradation in the northwestern region of study area, and restoration of grassland in the eastern region was the result of the combined effects of human activities and climate variability. Under global climate change, the establishment of Qilian Mountain National Park was of great significance to the grassland's protection and the grasslands ecological restoration that have been affected by humans., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Grassland, as a key component of the carbon cycle in terrestrial ecosystems, is vital in confronting global climate change. Characterising the carbon density of grassland ecosystems in the Longzhong Loess Plateau is important for accurately assessing the contribution of grasslands to global climate change and achieving the goal of "peak carbon" and "carbon neutral". In this study, the Longzhong Loess Plateau was used as the research object to explore changes in the plant–soil system carbon density in two grassland types by analysing the aboveground vegetation biomass carbon density, belowground vegetation biomass carbon density, 0–100 cm soil carbon density, and ecosystem carbon density of temperate steppe and temperate desert. The results showed that the vegetation biomass (standing and living, litter, and belowground biomass), soil, and ecosystem carbon densities of the temperate steppe were significantly higher than those of the temperate desert (p < 0.05). Their carbon densities were 700.51, 7612.95, and 8313.45 g·m−2, respectively. The vertical distribution of belowground biomass and soil carbon density in the temperate steppe was significantly higher than that in the temperate desert. The overall trend of belowground biomass carbon density in the temperate steppe and temperate desert showed a gradual decrease, whereas soil carbon density showed a steady increase. More than 91% and 96% of the carbon was stored in soil in the temperate steppe and temperate desert, respectively, and the belowground biomass carbon stock accounted for more than 84% of the total biomass carbon pools in both temperate steppe and temperate desert. Temperate steppe has a significant effect in improving the carbon stock of grassland ecosystems, so ecological protection and restoration of grassland should be strengthened in the future to enhance the capacity of grassland to sequester carbon and increase sinks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]